- Sep 23, 2005
- 32,544
- 6,049
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Only if you read it in isolation, and specifically, without verse 21. Read together, the egalitarian sense is quite straightforward.
As discussed at length in the thread, submitting to one another can happen within relationships that involve differing authority in roles.
A parent can yield in a matter to their child, even though the parent is in authority.
An overseer can yield to a congregant even though an overseer is in authority.
In the most extreme example, Jesus submitted to His parents, though He is God.
So submitting to one another does not rule out positiions of authority, and Vs. 23-24 do not change meaning by including vs. 21.
In the sense that, you asked if I thought everyone should be egalitarian. I am saying no, but I think everyone should not be promoting the attitudes which underpin abuse.
The Spirit is not going to inspire abuse. But plenty of people read the text in abusive ways, so we need to read with some principles which rule out such readings. Otherwise anyone can justify any reading, and we've seen some examples of that even in this thread.
You don't need to impose an outside test to rule out the reading given, because it is the opposite of what the text says. It speaks of laying down one's life for your wife, and loving her as your own body. It certainly doesn't say beating your wife.
Upvote
0