• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Recent content by Fervent

  1. Fervent

    Free will and determinism

    Now you're making false dilemmas? There are plenty of ontologies that aren't dualism or materialism. Though if the choice is between being a cobbled together homunculus or an irreducible self, the irreducible self wins. If it's mind or matter, mind wins. Idealism is more likely than materialism...
  2. Fervent

    Free will and determinism

    His definition is not the definition, so all you are doing here is defending a fallacious argument by insisting that it is true. It's not logic in any sense of the word. While it's true that defining the position isn't explicit in the definition of a strawman, it is implied since the issue is...
  3. Fervent

    Free will and determinism

    I've listed them. The first is begging the question, defining the terms in such a way that the conclusion is built into the definitions themselves. The second is creating a strawman, defining your opponents position so that it is easily discarded rather than letting them define it for...
  4. Fervent

    Free will and determinism

    So then why do you fight so hard to keep it? Why do you continue to employ fallacies in defending your position even after those fallacies have been named and pointed out?
  5. Fervent

    Free will and determinism

    How is such rebellion possible without free will? What is it that we are supposed to submit to God? Seems to me the stream runs in the other direction.
  6. Fervent

    Free will and determinism

    Not to be pedantic, but determinism doesn't "exist" it either obtains or it doesn't. And if we take your premise which seems to be a conditonal like this: If strict determnism is true, then free will is an illusion. We could easily employ a modus tollens by holding that free will is not an...
  7. Fervent

    Free will and determinism

    The burden of proof lies on the claimant(you), and since all you can supply is queston begging assumptions your assertion of determinism can be dismissed without consideration. It doesn't need to be challenged until you provide discrete evidence, which your attempts to affirm the consequent...
  8. Fervent

    Free will and determinism

    Your OP definition isn't the definition of free will, and defining what it must means to make easy work in dismissing it is not only question begging but strawmanning on top of it. Your argument is fallacies built on fallacies built on fallacies. And any claim to be following evidence is nothing...
  9. Fervent

    Free will and determinism

    Free will isn't "without a cause", it is agentive causation. So once again you are simply defining thing in such a way that everything that can occur will be taken as evidence, which empties any claim of it being built on evidence.
  10. Fervent

    Free will and determinism

    you're making a false analogy, because prompting AI doesn't require the AI to make a decision just run a calcultion. Requesting a human being to act or refrain from acting requires them understanding and evaluating the request, not simply calculating. There is also the issue of transmission...
  11. Fervent

    Free will and determinism

    I've spelled out what you are doing, which is creating a definition that cannot be falsified because any evidence presented will automatically be claimed as evidence for your belief. But as I said earlier, if everything can be evideence then nothing is evidence.
  12. Fervent

    Free will and determinism

    Saying "it's simply neurobiology" doesn't address my criticism, it's not a lack of understanding the premise. It's pointing out that the premise isn't liveable. Asking someone to act in a certain way requires they be in control of their actions, which requires free will. The move from squiggles...
  13. Fervent

    Free will and determinism

    It's pure magical thinking if you believe that squiggles on a screen can mysteriously lead to brain chemistry, electrical signalling, and structural changes all changing in such a way as to be consistent with fulfilling a request without an act of free will either to oblige the request or to...
  14. Fervent

    Free will and determinism

    Is it some kind of magic spell, then? How can someone act on a request without free will?
  15. Fervent

    Free will and determinism

    How can he? He has no free will, and can only do what was already set for him to do.