• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!

Taking Questions on Embedded Age Creation

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,854,570
52,326
Guam
✟5,056,603.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Which leads to the question I often raise but never get an answer to: How do you determine if a particular part of the Bible is meant to be taken literally or not?

As we're fond of saying: context, context, context.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,854,570
52,326
Guam
✟5,056,603.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why is it that Christians so often believe that atheists are just determined to not believe in God.

1. Because the Bible calls them "fools," and sincere people, who really seek after God, find Him.

2. Because God is going to hold them accountable for not believing in Him. That means He isn't going to buy into their "I looked for You, but You weren't there" excuse.

3. Because certain principles and warnings apply to those who spend their lives in pursuit of endeavors that lead away from God, and refuse to listen to those who warn them they're spending too much time (and treasure) elsewhere.
 

AveChristusRex

A Mohylite breathing with the 'Two Lungs'
Site Supporter
Nov 20, 2024
530
250
18
Bible Belt
✟32,153.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
2. Because God is going to hold them accountable for not believing in Him. That means He isn't going to buy into their "I looked for You, but You weren't there" excuse.
Here here! Citation in such regard is Romans 1:20: "For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse."
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,854,570
52,326
Guam
✟5,056,603.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I am an atheist in that I lack a belief in God.

Serious question:

If God exists, and you stand before Him on Judgement Day, what would you attribute your lack of belief to?

Would you blame Him, or yourself?

The only reason that it seems to you that I never talk about anything other than the existence of God is because you only see me when I am here, and I talk about these things why I am here. You have a view of me that gives you an incorrect idea of how much I talk about this.

And you make a good point.

One I've made here before about me.

You only see me railing against that part of science that is used against the Bible.

"Off camera," it's different.

True story:

The first time I sat on the porch swing with my wife -- (before we got married) -- all I did was point to the sky and show her the different constellations.

At Thanksgiving, I ask her if she's planning to have galliforms for dinner, and she knows right well what I'm talking about (turkey).

So I know exactly where you're coming from in this respect.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,854,570
52,326
Guam
✟5,056,603.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Here here! Citation in such regard is Romans 1:20: "For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse."

Yes, indeed!
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
6,181
3,155
82
Goldsboro NC
✟232,773.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Serious question:

If God exists, and you stand before Him on Judgement Day, what would you attribute your lack of belief to?

Would you blame Him, or yourself?
I would say, "Lord, it seemed like once I admitted to your existence I would be required to believe that the Earth was created 6000 years ago and I would have to be a supporter of Donald Trump, and I just couldn't bring myself to do it."
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Free Thinking isn't Critical Thinking!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
23,704
11,083
The Void!
✟1,297,979.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Serious question:

If God exists, and you stand before Him on Judgement Day, what would you attribute your lack of belief to?

Would you blame Him, or yourself?
I think you're leaving out at least one personage among many who are also to blame for contributing to any one person's "lack of belief."

So, the only thing we can nudge Kylie to be accountable for here and now is her willingness to learn rather than castigating her (or shaming her) for her present state of belief about Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

AveChristusRex

A Mohylite breathing with the 'Two Lungs'
Site Supporter
Nov 20, 2024
530
250
18
Bible Belt
✟32,153.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I think you're leaving out at least one personage among many who are also to blame for contributing to any one person's "lack of belief."

So, the only thing we can nudge Kylie to be accountable for here and now is her willingness to learn rather than castigating her (or shaming her) for her present state of belief about Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
Noone, necessarily, can be blamed for ignorance (except by God), but one can be blamed for obstinance in ignorance.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Free Thinking isn't Critical Thinking!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
23,704
11,083
The Void!
✟1,297,979.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Noone, necessarily, can be blamed for ignorance (except by God), but one can be blamed for obstinance in ignorance.

Right. That's what I said, and I said what I said after taking Epistemology, World History, History of Religions, and the findings of the Modern Sciences into account.

In other words: some people today actually DO have a personal and valid explanation as to "why" they don't see what Paul asserts everyone on earth should see. Moreover, I don't think Paul intended for his statements in Romans 1:18-20 to be used as a cudgel with which to whack other people over the head who are having difficulty believing.

And no one who is Christian should think those verses can simply be quoted all by themselves and that that speech act somehow irreducibly and absolutely ends all further discussion and disabuses any person of the justification of his/her perceptual stance.

But yes, people can be faulted for any unjustified anti-intellectual obstinacy and insolence.
 
Upvote 0

AveChristusRex

A Mohylite breathing with the 'Two Lungs'
Site Supporter
Nov 20, 2024
530
250
18
Bible Belt
✟32,153.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
In other words: some people today actually DO have a personal and valid explanation as to "why" they don't see what Paul asserts everyone on earth should see. Moreover, I don't think Paul intended for his statements in Romans 1:18-20 to be used as a cudgel with which to whack other people over the head who are having difficulty believing.
Much of the reasoning I think is emotional and based much less on the spirit and more on the people they have experienced. Everyone has a path to the faith, but we should recognize that all truth is God's truth, and to follow the truth is to eventually lead to God, and [excuse me for being opinionated] following God is to eventually lead to the One True Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church with many of our great saints like St. Thomas Aquinas, St. John of the Cross, St. Gregory Palamas, St. Theresa of Avila, and others awaiting you at the end of the path!
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,854,570
52,326
Guam
✟5,056,603.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
In other words: some people today actually DO have a personal and valid explanation as to "why" they don't see what Paul asserts everyone on earth should see.

Those are mental blocks.

And although I don't expect an unregenerate person to understand what Paul is saying in regards to the things of deep theology, I fault them for not taking first things first.

To wit, getting saved.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Slava Ukraini
Mar 11, 2017
19,506
15,006
55
USA
✟378,719.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
This is a statement, and "insults are arguements employed by those who are wrong" (Rousseau)

The geocentric model (what I think you are claiming when you dismiss Copernicus) is FALSE. Disagreeing with that is to reject reality. Running to agreement with the court jester isn't backing your position.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: sjastro
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,854,570
52,326
Guam
✟5,056,603.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Free Thinking isn't Critical Thinking!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
23,704
11,083
The Void!
✟1,297,979.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Those are mental blocks.
That comment doesn't have any explanatory power and tells us basically nothing about aspects of human psychology or epistemic structures in that affect a person's neurological structures and their response to .......... the Holy Spirit.
And although I don't expect an unregenerate person to understand what Paul is saying in regards to the things of deep theology, I fault them for not taking first things first.

To wit, getting saved.

I think you're getting the cart before the horse there, AV. Remember the Parable of the Sower, or the account of the Garden of Eden for that matter?
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Free Thinking isn't Critical Thinking!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
23,704
11,083
The Void!
✟1,297,979.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Much of the reasoning I think is emotional and based much less on the spirit and more on the people they have experienced. Everyone has a path to the faith, but we should recognize that all truth is God's truth, and to follow the truth is to eventually lead to God, and [excuse me for being opinionated] following God is to eventually lead to the One True Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church with many of our great saints like St. Thomas Aquinas, St. John of the Cross, St. Gregory Palamas, St. Theresa of Avila, and others awaiting you at the end of the path!

Excuse me if I don't completely agree with you on "the Plan of Faith." But carry on.
 
Upvote 0