Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Non-Mainstream and Controversial Science
We Live In An Electrical Simulation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hans Blaster" data-source="post: 77358044" data-attributes="member: 396028"><p>Maybe Chuck Missler should come here and defend the claim because he's the only one who did any work. (He prepared and gave a 30 minute talk as depicted in the video.) The OPer did nothing but link a video. I give their claim as much effort in response as it deserves.</p><p></p><p>(I skimmed the video and it is not much about electric simulations. Those only constitute a few minutes of the half-hour talk. The rest is other sorts of pseudoscience and bible talk.)</p><p></p><p>The simulations shown in the title frame of the YT video are:</p><p></p><p>1. Not simulations of the Universe, but alleged simulations of galaxies.</p><p>2. Have the wrong geometry for galaxies (the simulations are an infinite length 2D cylinder, galaxies are thin)</p><p>3. Even if they had the right geometry, the properties of the spiral blobs and actual galaxies do not match</p><p>4. They don't even *look* that much like galaxies beyond the superficial presence of two spiral arms in the final image</p><p>5. The precursor states in these simulations of the two merging plasmoids do not match anything found in space and we have lots of images of galaxies in various stages of collision.</p><p></p><p>It's not quite an infinite regress of wrongness, but it is a deep layer of failures.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hans Blaster, post: 77358044, member: 396028"] Maybe Chuck Missler should come here and defend the claim because he's the only one who did any work. (He prepared and gave a 30 minute talk as depicted in the video.) The OPer did nothing but link a video. I give their claim as much effort in response as it deserves. (I skimmed the video and it is not much about electric simulations. Those only constitute a few minutes of the half-hour talk. The rest is other sorts of pseudoscience and bible talk.) The simulations shown in the title frame of the YT video are: 1. Not simulations of the Universe, but alleged simulations of galaxies. 2. Have the wrong geometry for galaxies (the simulations are an infinite length 2D cylinder, galaxies are thin) 3. Even if they had the right geometry, the properties of the spiral blobs and actual galaxies do not match 4. They don't even *look* that much like galaxies beyond the superficial presence of two spiral arms in the final image 5. The precursor states in these simulations of the two merging plasmoids do not match anything found in space and we have lots of images of galaxies in various stages of collision. It's not quite an infinite regress of wrongness, but it is a deep layer of failures. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Non-Mainstream and Controversial Science
We Live In An Electrical Simulation
Top
Bottom