Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
29% of households have jobs but struggle to cover basic needs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chesterton" data-source="post: 77660617" data-attributes="member: 225709"><p>Trust me, you don't have to explain this to me. Unfortunately, I may understand such circumstances better than most people on these forums. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>All I'm saying is that I think it's always been this way. Throughout history, there must have always been a spectrum of financial well-being ranging from the homeless person who owns nothing but the clothes he's wearing, to multi-billionaires. And if there's a spectrum, there must have always been people who fall into the range of the spectrum that the OP is discussing.</p><p></p><p>Also, I think your position might be a bit tautological. Seems you're saying that people who don't have/make enough money, don't have/make enough money (for whatever purpose, such as avoiding poverty in case of the occurrence of a costly emergency). Of course I agree with that, and I wish it were otherwise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chesterton, post: 77660617, member: 225709"] Trust me, you don't have to explain this to me. Unfortunately, I may understand such circumstances better than most people on these forums. :) All I'm saying is that I think it's always been this way. Throughout history, there must have always been a spectrum of financial well-being ranging from the homeless person who owns nothing but the clothes he's wearing, to multi-billionaires. And if there's a spectrum, there must have always been people who fall into the range of the spectrum that the OP is discussing. Also, I think your position might be a bit tautological. Seems you're saying that people who don't have/make enough money, don't have/make enough money (for whatever purpose, such as avoiding poverty in case of the occurrence of a costly emergency). Of course I agree with that, and I wish it were otherwise. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
29% of households have jobs but struggle to cover basic needs
Top
Bottom