There's nothing condescending in that. You chose the word "believe". I don't "believe". I answered you specifically.
I
know. I assumed you specifically chose the word "believe" in an attempt to the copious amounts of data and research that supports the theory.
That's not attacking your integrity. I explained how I understood your post. If I misunderstood your post, please feel free to correct me; I recognize nobody (myself included) always represents themselves in type how they mean to.
I am of the opinion that you made the initial claim and that you could explain yourself in greater detail.
Did you read my last post? I explained that I need to FIRST understand what they don't know. Otherwise me teaching them is beating my head against a brick wall.
But let's try some evidence then.
What, in this experiment do you take umbrage with?