Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Voyager 1 transmitting data again after NASA remotely fixes 46-year-old probe
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SelfSim" data-source="post: 77656069" data-attributes="member: 354922"><p>Hmm .. interesting. I'm open to being shown how I'm arguing against a strawman(?)</p><p>Do you agree that the pathway to modern-day human intelligence is unique, regardless of other in-common (approximate) features shared across other species?</p><p></p><p>To be clear, the unique human intelligence I'm speaking about here, is the type which demonstrates the ability to communicate in the RF or optical domains, (or in the case of Voyager messaging: physically), across vast distances. I am not aware of any other species in our biosphere capable of sending or receiving intelligible messages that way(?)</p><p></p><p>Squid do not meet the criteria I outline above. I hope my clarfication is sufficient to escape your strawman inference(?)</p><p>Squid are also, (presumably) unique within their own niches .. which is different from the niche in which we find human intelligence.</p><p>SETI is not seeking out squid intelligence over astronomical distances.</p><p></p><p>I'm unclear about the need for another thread. Voyager contains a prominent attempt at SETI messaging.</p><p>There still exists the possibility of resolving this matter fairly quickly in this thread, by confining discussion to the scope of Voyager's intended messaging capabilities, coupled with the clarifications I just provided(?)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SelfSim, post: 77656069, member: 354922"] Hmm .. interesting. I'm open to being shown how I'm arguing against a strawman(?) Do you agree that the pathway to modern-day human intelligence is unique, regardless of other in-common (approximate) features shared across other species? To be clear, the unique human intelligence I'm speaking about here, is the type which demonstrates the ability to communicate in the RF or optical domains, (or in the case of Voyager messaging: physically), across vast distances. I am not aware of any other species in our biosphere capable of sending or receiving intelligible messages that way(?) Squid do not meet the criteria I outline above. I hope my clarfication is sufficient to escape your strawman inference(?) Squid are also, (presumably) unique within their own niches .. which is different from the niche in which we find human intelligence. SETI is not seeking out squid intelligence over astronomical distances. I'm unclear about the need for another thread. Voyager contains a prominent attempt at SETI messaging. There still exists the possibility of resolving this matter fairly quickly in this thread, by confining discussion to the scope of Voyager's intended messaging capabilities, coupled with the clarifications I just provided(?) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Voyager 1 transmitting data again after NASA remotely fixes 46-year-old probe
Top
Bottom