Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
The Fall of the West (It's Happening Now)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bradskii" data-source="post: 77605008" data-attributes="member: 412388"><p>I'm glad you asked if that happened. No, it wasn't because of that. From here: <a href="https://www.wdrb.com/news/crime-reports/woman-arrested-after-running-red-light-causing-fatal-crash-on-taylor-boulevard-louisville-police-say/article_65d9800e-e4cb-11ee-814f-7f36f105b8d4.html" target="_blank">Woman arrested after running red light, causing fatal crash on Taylor Boulevard, Louisville police say</a></p><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">'The Indiana Attorney General's Office is required to defend the state, and wrote in Supreme Court filings that Child Protective Services removed the child to get medical treatment for an eating disorder that was, in part, rooted in their parents' beliefs.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">A filing from the AG's Office said the eating disorder was "Fueled in part by (the) child's self-isolation from the parents and that behavior was likely to reoccur if (the) child was placed back in the home."</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">The case has been through the state courts, and every court agreed the state did nothing wrong. </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">When asked for comment, Attorney General Todd Rokita's office declined, but sent the below statement:</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">"We always protect parental rights and religious liberty. Neither we nor the Indiana courts believe that the State can remove a child because of a parent’s religious beliefs, views about gender identity, or anything of the sort. Our office is fulfilling our statutory duty to defend this state agency and to keep an oath I swore when I took office. As the record shows, this state agency acted not on the use of pronouns but because of the child’s extreme eating disorder. </span></p><p></p><p>Glad I could confirm that western civilisation is not crumbling. You're welcome.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bradskii, post: 77605008, member: 412388"] I'm glad you asked if that happened. No, it wasn't because of that. From here: [URL="https://www.wdrb.com/news/crime-reports/woman-arrested-after-running-red-light-causing-fatal-crash-on-taylor-boulevard-louisville-police-say/article_65d9800e-e4cb-11ee-814f-7f36f105b8d4.html"]Woman arrested after running red light, causing fatal crash on Taylor Boulevard, Louisville police say[/URL] [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]'The Indiana Attorney General's Office is required to defend the state, and wrote in Supreme Court filings that Child Protective Services removed the child to get medical treatment for an eating disorder that was, in part, rooted in their parents' beliefs. A filing from the AG's Office said the eating disorder was "Fueled in part by (the) child's self-isolation from the parents and that behavior was likely to reoccur if (the) child was placed back in the home." The case has been through the state courts, and every court agreed the state did nothing wrong. When asked for comment, Attorney General Todd Rokita's office declined, but sent the below statement: "We always protect parental rights and religious liberty. Neither we nor the Indiana courts believe that the State can remove a child because of a parent’s religious beliefs, views about gender identity, or anything of the sort. Our office is fulfilling our statutory duty to defend this state agency and to keep an oath I swore when I took office. As the record shows, this state agency acted not on the use of pronouns but because of the child’s extreme eating disorder. [/COLOR] Glad I could confirm that western civilisation is not crumbling. You're welcome. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
The Fall of the West (It's Happening Now)
Top
Bottom