Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Definition of KIND
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AV1611VET" data-source="post: 77611000" data-attributes="member: 152669"><p>I disagree.</p><p></p><p>Did you follow the conversation after sfs posted a chart of some ten different species of the same kind of bird, but had seven different KINDS assigned to them on paper?</p><p></p><p>When I ask about that, it was explained to me that they arbitrarily give different GENUS names to the same kinds of animals.</p><p></p><p>Thus, if you see two different species of animals procreating successfully, but they have two different GENUS names, I submit they are mislabeled.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope.</p><p></p><p>It's a mislabeling on the part of taxonomists (or whomever).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Only on paper.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope.</p><p></p><p>If I did that, I would be buying into sciences' errors, mistakes, mislabels, chiselings, number crunchings, decimal point slidings, data forcefittings, connecting the dots, blue-lining over missing links, and a host of other things, including some things that would get me moderated if I listed them.</p><p></p><p>KIND = GENUS</p><p></p><p>It's really that simple.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AV1611VET, post: 77611000, member: 152669"] I disagree. Did you follow the conversation after sfs posted a chart of some ten different species of the same kind of bird, but had seven different KINDS assigned to them on paper? When I ask about that, it was explained to me that they arbitrarily give different GENUS names to the same kinds of animals. Thus, if you see two different species of animals procreating successfully, but they have two different GENUS names, I submit they are mislabeled. Nope. It's a mislabeling on the part of taxonomists (or whomever). Only on paper. Nope. If I did that, I would be buying into sciences' errors, mistakes, mislabels, chiselings, number crunchings, decimal point slidings, data forcefittings, connecting the dots, blue-lining over missing links, and a host of other things, including some things that would get me moderated if I listed them. KIND = GENUS It's really that simple. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Definition of KIND
Top
Bottom