Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Definition of KIND
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Barbarian" data-source="post: 77610491" data-attributes="member: 7989"><p>Reality. Not everyone's new idea is a good one. Creationism has a reality problem.</p><p></p><p>As you know, that's not evolutionary theory. Darwin, for example, thought that God might have orginally created any number of organisms. But genetics shows that all known life on Earth has a common ancestor.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope. </p><p>For example, the "cat kind", according to creationists, is a family with a number of subfamilies. </p><p>The "dog kind" is a family with several subfamilies.</p><p>The "horse kind" is a family with several subfamilies.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm sure you're sincere. But as you see, you're completely wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Barbarian, post: 77610491, member: 7989"] Reality. Not everyone's new idea is a good one. Creationism has a reality problem. As you know, that's not evolutionary theory. Darwin, for example, thought that God might have orginally created any number of organisms. But genetics shows that all known life on Earth has a common ancestor. Nope. For example, the "cat kind", according to creationists, is a family with a number of subfamilies. The "dog kind" is a family with several subfamilies. The "horse kind" is a family with several subfamilies. I'm sure you're sincere. But as you see, you're completely wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Definition of KIND
Top
Bottom