Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
My Epiphany
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Saucy" data-source="post: 76730153" data-attributes="member: 313246"><p>I had a similar, but opposite, journey. Started out as a staunch atheist who studied all types of sciences and lauded evolution while calling my creationist friend stupid. Then God spoke to me one day and changed my whole life. The next few years were quite difficult, including multiple panic attacks as my entire worldview was going up in smoke.</p><p></p><p>What I learned during that time is there are indeed a lot of credibility issues with so-called transitional forms. Many forgeries were lifted up as absolute proof and written in science textbooks. Vast, elaborate drawings that were born showing a full transitional creature based entirely on imagination and a couple of bones.</p><p></p><p>According to <a href="https://www.icr.org/article/a-150-years-later-fossils-still-dont-help-darwin" target="_blank">this</a> article from the Institute of Creation Research:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>and</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think it makes a good point. Shared features don't necessarily mean it's a transitional feature. You can look at two cars created by two completely different companies and they will still have similar features. Why can't God have used similar features when creating both apes and humans? </p><p></p><p>What you're not going to find from the fossil record is a complete A to Z roadmap of an entire creature's transition perfectly laid out. Besides, the complexity of the genetic code, which you started with, still does not give credence nor can be explained by evolution.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Saucy, post: 76730153, member: 313246"] I had a similar, but opposite, journey. Started out as a staunch atheist who studied all types of sciences and lauded evolution while calling my creationist friend stupid. Then God spoke to me one day and changed my whole life. The next few years were quite difficult, including multiple panic attacks as my entire worldview was going up in smoke. What I learned during that time is there are indeed a lot of credibility issues with so-called transitional forms. Many forgeries were lifted up as absolute proof and written in science textbooks. Vast, elaborate drawings that were born showing a full transitional creature based entirely on imagination and a couple of bones. According to [URL='https://www.icr.org/article/a-150-years-later-fossils-still-dont-help-darwin']this[/URL] article from the Institute of Creation Research: and I think it makes a good point. Shared features don't necessarily mean it's a transitional feature. You can look at two cars created by two completely different companies and they will still have similar features. Why can't God have used similar features when creating both apes and humans? What you're not going to find from the fossil record is a complete A to Z roadmap of an entire creature's transition perfectly laid out. Besides, the complexity of the genetic code, which you started with, still does not give credence nor can be explained by evolution. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
My Epiphany
Top
Bottom