Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
How Can Molecules Think?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FredVB" data-source="post: 77460596" data-attributes="member: 259043"><p>Epiphenomenalism does not attribute cause of actions to the soul. The claim is that it appears to the soul that the soul is cause of actions which it is not, as though it was coincidence. No actions are caused by the conscious mind, according to this view. Hence, it is not compatible with the perspective of Christian responsibility. We can search for where 'choose' occurs in the Bible, to show that, and our choices which result in consequential things are our responsibility then. This is in disagreement with epiphenomenalism, that view that the consciousness is not connected with physical occurrences, though that view works with the perspective of the original post, which is why I mentioned these separate approaches in philosophy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FredVB, post: 77460596, member: 259043"] Epiphenomenalism does not attribute cause of actions to the soul. The claim is that it appears to the soul that the soul is cause of actions which it is not, as though it was coincidence. No actions are caused by the conscious mind, according to this view. Hence, it is not compatible with the perspective of Christian responsibility. We can search for where 'choose' occurs in the Bible, to show that, and our choices which result in consequential things are our responsibility then. This is in disagreement with epiphenomenalism, that view that the consciousness is not connected with physical occurrences, though that view works with the perspective of the original post, which is why I mentioned these separate approaches in philosophy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
How Can Molecules Think?
Top
Bottom