Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Free will and determinism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bradskii" data-source="post: 77656825" data-attributes="member: 412388"><p>If you are an incompatibilist then your position is incompatibilism (I can't believe I had to write that). And your position is to deny that free will is compatible with a determinate world. But there is free will, <em>therefore</em> the world is not determinate.</p><p></p><p>So the answer to this earlier question...</p><p></p><p>'So you admit that you cannot even represent the incompatibilist free will position?'</p><p></p><p>...is: The position is that the world is not determinate. </p><p></p><p>It would have been a <em>lot</em> clearer if you said I was rejecting that position. Which was pretty obvious as I did that in the very first sentence of the very first post. And which nobody has yet rejected. Maybe you want to?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Luckily we have you to keep us on the straight and narrow, stop the discussion wandering off into the undergrowth and prevent harm. Thanks on behalf of everyone who has contributed so far. Whatever their pay grade.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bradskii, post: 77656825, member: 412388"] If you are an incompatibilist then your position is incompatibilism (I can't believe I had to write that). And your position is to deny that free will is compatible with a determinate world. But there is free will, [I]therefore[/I] the world is not determinate. So the answer to this earlier question... 'So you admit that you cannot even represent the incompatibilist free will position?' ...is: The position is that the world is not determinate. It would have been a [I]lot[/I] clearer if you said I was rejecting that position. Which was pretty obvious as I did that in the very first sentence of the very first post. And which nobody has yet rejected. Maybe you want to? Luckily we have you to keep us on the straight and narrow, stop the discussion wandering off into the undergrowth and prevent harm. Thanks on behalf of everyone who has contributed so far. Whatever their pay grade. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Free will and determinism
Top
Bottom