Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Struggles by Non-Christians
Can a skeptic on the fence have a personal encounter with God?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="2PhiloVoid" data-source="post: 77181152" data-attributes="member: 167101"><p>Ok. So, you seem to be familiar at least a bit with Philosophy. That's good ... maybe you know more than I do. I don't know everything and I'm sure I could be wrong about a lot of things.</p><p></p><p>On my side, while I do lean toward Existentialist freedom of thought and advocate freedom of mind generally considered, I don't also assume the position of a thoroughgoing doxastic voluntarism, especially where Christianity is concerned.</p><p></p><p>At the same time, I tend to contest the notion that any of us has the perfect notion about what justification "is" and that we've actually reached a Let's just say that I harbor on Meta-Epistemology and the faultlnes of all human thought before I either gripe and complain or give my applause and accolades to human ideals or religion. I'm going to start with Cartesian Skepticism and go from there.</p><p></p><p>All I'm suggesting here in cursory form is that if you're sitting on fence about the three problems you've mentioned previously, what may be at issue isn't that you're sitting on the fence but rather how you're concpetualzing the whole state and praxis of the epistemic supposed positioning involved. You might need to test the quality of your "epistemic bar" and what it is you think you're doing when you're attempting to measure your epistemic success and/or so-called sufficiency.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="2PhiloVoid, post: 77181152, member: 167101"] Ok. So, you seem to be familiar at least a bit with Philosophy. That's good ... maybe you know more than I do. I don't know everything and I'm sure I could be wrong about a lot of things. On my side, while I do lean toward Existentialist freedom of thought and advocate freedom of mind generally considered, I don't also assume the position of a thoroughgoing doxastic voluntarism, especially where Christianity is concerned. At the same time, I tend to contest the notion that any of us has the perfect notion about what justification "is" and that we've actually reached a Let's just say that I harbor on Meta-Epistemology and the faultlnes of all human thought before I either gripe and complain or give my applause and accolades to human ideals or religion. I'm going to start with Cartesian Skepticism and go from there. All I'm suggesting here in cursory form is that if you're sitting on fence about the three problems you've mentioned previously, what may be at issue isn't that you're sitting on the fence but rather how you're concpetualzing the whole state and praxis of the epistemic supposed positioning involved. You might need to test the quality of your "epistemic bar" and what it is you think you're doing when you're attempting to measure your epistemic success and/or so-called sufficiency. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Struggles by Non-Christians
Can a skeptic on the fence have a personal encounter with God?
Top
Bottom