Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Ai vs Christian theology
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kylie" data-source="post: 77622055" data-attributes="member: 343110"><p>By this logic, people can only ever investigate things that are real. And any time someone investigates a hypothesis, that hypothesis will inevitably be proved correct.</p><p></p><p>So, how did people every consider the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_(classical_element)" target="_blank">aether</a>? By your logic, people would not have investigated it unless they had enough evidence to determine it is true. And yet, clearly, that theory was wrong. By your own argument, it never should have been considered in the first place.</p><p></p><p>Also, you are assuming that I have never investigated the validity of religious faith. I have. When I got together with my husband, I tried praying and all that stuff, because it was important to my husband. I never got anything from it. </p><p></p><p>Tell me, why is it that believers so often hold the viewpoint that if someone else does the praying and all that, that they'll ALWAYS come to the same conclusion that they did? And why do they find it so hard to believe that not reaching the same conclusion is impossible? And that if someone hasn't reached the same conclusion, then they must not have looked into it yet?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kylie, post: 77622055, member: 343110"] By this logic, people can only ever investigate things that are real. And any time someone investigates a hypothesis, that hypothesis will inevitably be proved correct. So, how did people every consider the [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_(classical_element)']aether[/URL]? By your logic, people would not have investigated it unless they had enough evidence to determine it is true. And yet, clearly, that theory was wrong. By your own argument, it never should have been considered in the first place. Also, you are assuming that I have never investigated the validity of religious faith. I have. When I got together with my husband, I tried praying and all that stuff, because it was important to my husband. I never got anything from it. Tell me, why is it that believers so often hold the viewpoint that if someone else does the praying and all that, that they'll ALWAYS come to the same conclusion that they did? And why do they find it so hard to believe that not reaching the same conclusion is impossible? And that if someone hasn't reached the same conclusion, then they must not have looked into it yet? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Ai vs Christian theology
Top
Bottom