Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Ai vs Christian theology
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kylie" data-source="post: 77622048" data-attributes="member: 343110"><p>You made a claim back in post 107. Why would you make a claim if you didn't care whether I believed it or not?</p><p></p><p>And I'd be happy to accept the Gospel if I could be shown some evidence that it is accurate.</p><p></p><p>But it seems that the best anyone has to offer is, "Believe that it is true first, then and only then will you get the evidence you need to justify your belief."</p><p></p><p>And from what I've seen, that evidence is simply relying on the fact that once people believe, they typically are more willing to accept things that agree with them without subjecting them to scrutiny.</p><p></p><p>You do realise that personal experience can NEVER be considered objective evidence, right?</p><p></p><p>But anything you could present in that regards would be subjective evidence, not the objective evidence that I'm looking for.</p><p></p><p>What does this even mean?</p><p></p><p>Again, what's up with these "etcs"?</p><p></p><p>And another one.</p><p></p><p>How would that cloud my judgement when what I said makes it very clear that I don't see any correlation at all?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kylie, post: 77622048, member: 343110"] You made a claim back in post 107. Why would you make a claim if you didn't care whether I believed it or not? And I'd be happy to accept the Gospel if I could be shown some evidence that it is accurate. But it seems that the best anyone has to offer is, "Believe that it is true first, then and only then will you get the evidence you need to justify your belief." And from what I've seen, that evidence is simply relying on the fact that once people believe, they typically are more willing to accept things that agree with them without subjecting them to scrutiny. You do realise that personal experience can NEVER be considered objective evidence, right? But anything you could present in that regards would be subjective evidence, not the objective evidence that I'm looking for. What does this even mean? Again, what's up with these "etcs"? And another one. How would that cloud my judgement when what I said makes it very clear that I don't see any correlation at all? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Ai vs Christian theology
Top
Bottom