Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
AI & Trust
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J_B_" data-source="post: 77576543" data-attributes="member: 428251"><p>Chess is a trivial example. AI is suggesting moves in a game you already understand.</p><p></p><p>The example I gave is about making moves in a game we don't understand. The example involved nuclear physics. Consider the consequences of implementing a nuclear device based on a model we don't understand. And then there's a meltdown, an explosion, radiation poisoning ... Maybe humans could mitigate those results, maybe not. Consider a less dramatic case, where the device suggested by AI is used for power generation, transportation, something like that, and it breaks down after going into production. Now we need to fix this device people have come to depend upon, but we can't because we don't know how.</p><p></p><p>I'm surprised you can't imagine possibilities where utilizing technology we don't understand could go bad. But if, for you, AI is only about winning chess games, I can see why you wouldn't think it's important.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J_B_, post: 77576543, member: 428251"] Chess is a trivial example. AI is suggesting moves in a game you already understand. The example I gave is about making moves in a game we don't understand. The example involved nuclear physics. Consider the consequences of implementing a nuclear device based on a model we don't understand. And then there's a meltdown, an explosion, radiation poisoning ... Maybe humans could mitigate those results, maybe not. Consider a less dramatic case, where the device suggested by AI is used for power generation, transportation, something like that, and it breaks down after going into production. Now we need to fix this device people have come to depend upon, but we can't because we don't know how. I'm surprised you can't imagine possibilities where utilizing technology we don't understand could go bad. But if, for you, AI is only about winning chess games, I can see why you wouldn't think it's important. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
AI & Trust
Top
Bottom