Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
A short explaination of the human-nature
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Warden_of_the_Storm" data-source="post: 77433376" data-attributes="member: 381462"><p>The middle ground is accepting that either one of us could be wrong. That's really it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No you didn't. You just made claims about how everything is evidence of a global flood without actually showing any evidence for it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, because honestly I'm getting sick of talking to you.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You didn't talk about anything since your idea does not make sense nor deserve merit. Even if I accept the idea that you put forward that dinosaurs and humans lived together but in different locales, it does not explain at all why we find dinosaurs in sediment lower and older than ancient mammals, which are also in sediment lower and older than what we find the earlist humans in. If we accept your idea that nearly every creature (I don't know where you stand on animals that came before the dinosaurs so we're leaving them to the wayside) that ever existed lived at the same, then was just thrown together in the tumult of the Noahic Flood and died together at the same time, then we should not find them in sediments by age of the layers. We should only find the largest animals at the bottom: whales alongside kronosaurs and basilosaurs and brachiosaurs and diplodicus, with sequentially smaller animals towards the top until those that floated the longest would be at the top, with obviously some variety thrown in because of current and depth. We do not see that all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Warden_of_the_Storm, post: 77433376, member: 381462"] The middle ground is accepting that either one of us could be wrong. That's really it. No you didn't. You just made claims about how everything is evidence of a global flood without actually showing any evidence for it. No, because honestly I'm getting sick of talking to you. You didn't talk about anything since your idea does not make sense nor deserve merit. Even if I accept the idea that you put forward that dinosaurs and humans lived together but in different locales, it does not explain at all why we find dinosaurs in sediment lower and older than ancient mammals, which are also in sediment lower and older than what we find the earlist humans in. If we accept your idea that nearly every creature (I don't know where you stand on animals that came before the dinosaurs so we're leaving them to the wayside) that ever existed lived at the same, then was just thrown together in the tumult of the Noahic Flood and died together at the same time, then we should not find them in sediments by age of the layers. We should only find the largest animals at the bottom: whales alongside kronosaurs and basilosaurs and brachiosaurs and diplodicus, with sequentially smaller animals towards the top until those that floated the longest would be at the top, with obviously some variety thrown in because of current and depth. We do not see that all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
A short explaination of the human-nature
Top
Bottom