Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
A short explaination of the human-nature
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Derf" data-source="post: 77433145" data-attributes="member: 436903"><p>Not sea creatures. Sharks, crabs, and other aquatic scavengers are still alive (not all, but some). So Noah didn't have to take sea creatures in the ark. Insects were probably still alive in a lot of cases. And certainly bacteria survived the flood without having to be on the ark.</p><p></p><p>I'm trying to figure out what you're proposing would happen in a flood. </p><p></p><p>In a preservative environment, yes. But not all biological material. And not millions, right?</p><p></p><p>It still depends on how the remains ended up. Exposed to the sun? Or to bacteria? Or scavengers? No remains. Buried and compressed and heated? Some remains.</p><p></p><p>Good. I'm glad you're reading them. Creation.com is another good source. </p><p>So if we've found such soft tissue from animals that supposedly lived 70 + millions of years ago (or much more), that tells us they probably didn't live that long ago... It fits the scenario you're suggesting--that they all (including dinosaurs and even more ancient animals) died fairly recently, because there is still biological material in the fossils, including DNA.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Derf, post: 77433145, member: 436903"] Not sea creatures. Sharks, crabs, and other aquatic scavengers are still alive (not all, but some). So Noah didn't have to take sea creatures in the ark. Insects were probably still alive in a lot of cases. And certainly bacteria survived the flood without having to be on the ark. I'm trying to figure out what you're proposing would happen in a flood. In a preservative environment, yes. But not all biological material. And not millions, right? It still depends on how the remains ended up. Exposed to the sun? Or to bacteria? Or scavengers? No remains. Buried and compressed and heated? Some remains. Good. I'm glad you're reading them. Creation.com is another good source. So if we've found such soft tissue from animals that supposedly lived 70 + millions of years ago (or much more), that tells us they probably didn't live that long ago... It fits the scenario you're suggesting--that they all (including dinosaurs and even more ancient animals) died fairly recently, because there is still biological material in the fossils, including DNA. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
A short explaination of the human-nature
Top
Bottom