Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
A short explaination of the human-nature
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Derf" data-source="post: 77432684" data-attributes="member: 436903"><p>What does "the middle" look like to you? Does that mean there was a global flood, but it only destroyed half of the animals God made in the beginning? Or if I say I'm willing to drop the flood as long as the earth is still only about 6000 years old? The points go together. The reason the earth looks old to you is that you interpret geological layers as representing large amounts of time, whereas my position is that a catastrophic, world-wide flood as described in the bible would do exactly what we see in the layers of the geologic column. They are directly opposing views, and there is no middle ground. If I'm right, then you are wrong. If you're right, then I am wrong. If you think you can squeeze some middle ground in there, let me hear your proposal...but I don't think you can.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, you're wrong about that! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p>I also gave reasons why you were wrong. This is where you get to defend yourself or tell me me WHY my reasons are wrong. Go ahead...I can take it.</p><p></p><p>Are you ready to move on to my next point?</p><p></p><p>Animals would not just be floating around in clean water, or they wouldn't fossilize, as you pointed out before (see, we DO agree on some things). They had to be covered by sediments. And I talked about a way that could happen to different types of animals in different layers. If you disagree with my scenario, offer one of your own.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Derf, post: 77432684, member: 436903"] What does "the middle" look like to you? Does that mean there was a global flood, but it only destroyed half of the animals God made in the beginning? Or if I say I'm willing to drop the flood as long as the earth is still only about 6000 years old? The points go together. The reason the earth looks old to you is that you interpret geological layers as representing large amounts of time, whereas my position is that a catastrophic, world-wide flood as described in the bible would do exactly what we see in the layers of the geologic column. They are directly opposing views, and there is no middle ground. If I'm right, then you are wrong. If you're right, then I am wrong. If you think you can squeeze some middle ground in there, let me hear your proposal...but I don't think you can. No, you're wrong about that! ;) I also gave reasons why you were wrong. This is where you get to defend yourself or tell me me WHY my reasons are wrong. Go ahead...I can take it. Are you ready to move on to my next point? Animals would not just be floating around in clean water, or they wouldn't fossilize, as you pointed out before (see, we DO agree on some things). They had to be covered by sediments. And I talked about a way that could happen to different types of animals in different layers. If you disagree with my scenario, offer one of your own. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
A short explaination of the human-nature
Top
Bottom