Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
A short explaination of the human-nature
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Warden_of_the_Storm" data-source="post: 77432636" data-attributes="member: 381462"><p>I like conversing people who disagree with me. But when it's the same claims (not evidence but claims) being trotted out again and again and again, and you show that you inherently will not be able to meet me in the middle, then I have to wonder if it's worth it.</p><p></p><p>And no, you refuted nothing because all you did was go "No, that's just wrong", "No, wrong", "Wrong", "Wrong", etc, etc, through the whole thing. You've not shown any evidence to support the claim that there was a global flood. Your asinine attempt at an analogy with the iced tea was flawed because the physics of honey in water are nowhere near the same as the physics that would effect bodies of animals in a global flood.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Warden_of_the_Storm, post: 77432636, member: 381462"] I like conversing people who disagree with me. But when it's the same claims (not evidence but claims) being trotted out again and again and again, and you show that you inherently will not be able to meet me in the middle, then I have to wonder if it's worth it. And no, you refuted nothing because all you did was go "No, that's just wrong", "No, wrong", "Wrong", "Wrong", etc, etc, through the whole thing. You've not shown any evidence to support the claim that there was a global flood. Your asinine attempt at an analogy with the iced tea was flawed because the physics of honey in water are nowhere near the same as the physics that would effect bodies of animals in a global flood. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
A short explaination of the human-nature
Top
Bottom