Search results

No. What was the federal crime that Trump was covering up! There was none. Which is why the judge told the jury to literally make it up! If they BELIEVED Trump was concealing a federal offense, regardless of any evidence, by golly, that is good enough for him.

Yes it did unless there was evidence that proved Trump was trying to cover up a federal crime. There are literally only two legal possibilities: 1. Trump falsified documents to cover up a federal crime. Which would result in a federal trial. 2. Trump is charged with falsifying documents in...

Therefore, the charges were well past the statutes of limitations and should have been dismissed...period.

What other crime? In know you don't know because nobody knows. The judge even told the jury to use their imagination. SO WHAT WAS THE FEDERAL CRIME?

You are wasting your time explaining. The only concern of the left is destroying Trump. Even if they destroy the country in the process. They will gladly embrace mutually assured destruction if it means Trump is destroyed.

There is no "so you say." You said he was being charged with a state crime to cover up a federal crime. The statute of limitations expired for the state crime, therefor New York should have had nothing to do with anything and should have been tried in federal cour for election interference. But...

Charged with a state crime that was past its statute of limitations with the supposed intention of covering up election fraud (a federal crime) that was never introduced in court. Meaning that if this was actually a legitimate case, the state court would not have jurisdiction over it (because...

WHOSE STATUTE OF LIMITATONS EXPIRED! WHAT WAS THE STATE CRIME TRUMP WAS TRYING TO CONCEAL! I am literally frustrated because I am conversing with people who are applauding kangaroo courts and making this country a banana Republic so they can sleep better at night knowing that their political...

Dude, you literally have no clue and just literally making things up out of thin air. Unless you are a mind reader, you are a hack.

Well, if Trump keeps his promise by being a "dictator on the first day," he would be aggressively kicking out the corruption without hesitation as if he was staring on "The Apprentice!" You're Fired! But alas, that is what the liberal left fears the most, and are most willing to destroy the...

Thank you for clarifying the obvious. Perhaps you should apply to become a Biden handler/speech writer. You have talent and what it takes.

Yes. The New York post confirmed the laptop was real long before the FBI were willing to admit it. Which is why the left strong-armed Facebook, Google, and Twittter to lable it as "false information" or "Russian subversion" so people would stop asking questions. Three years ago, people were...

"Violation of FEDERAL campaign finance limits" = federal offens tried in a federal court. Plus, no evidence was presented in the hearings to suggest that Trump actually did such. "unlawfully influencing the 2016 U.S. presidential election" = federal offense tried in a federal court. Again, not...

Precisely! Nowhere in America has this ever been a thing! Only in Communist China, the Soviet Union, or a third-world banana Republic in South America is this a thing. So please wake up and realize thatn just because the Hudge presiding over involving your most hated person, allowing the jury...

I rest my case. Kangaroo court indeed. What is the most disturbing is that regardless if Trump is completely exonerated, the liberal left will always call Trump a "convicted felon." Because that makes them happy and sleep better at night regardless if he is innocent or not. The jury was like...

"With the intent of committing other crimes." WHAT WERE THE OTHER CRIMES! Even if there were other crimes that influenced the election, that would then be a federal case. So why on earth wad it tried in a state court? Answer: because screw Trump. That's why. And that's why his donations...

It was because Trump is a mean ol' meanie man and needs to be punished. That was Trump's federal crime that he was trying to conceal.

Since you were so much more informed about this case than anyone else, what evidence was presented to suggest that the documents were specifically falsified to influence an election and where was the evidence showing the influence? Honestly, there is no possible way you can answer this question...

With the intent of covering what crime?! Circular reasoning. What federal crime did Trump commit that warrented a federal case, but conveniently was processed outside a federal court? WHAT WAS HIS FEDERAL CRIME THAT HE WAS HIDING AFTER HIS SUPPOSED atourny

Well, I belive that Biden molests children. Therefore he should be convicted as a pedophile. I guess it could would both ways.