Recent content by Postvieww

Cohen was free to attack Trump and even fund raise off of it . Trump could not respond, that is the unfairness of it. Then again many times the left will shut down speech they do not like.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/10/25/trump-election-case-gag-order-violates-constitution-aclu-says.html

Well we might agree in principle. He did poke the bear (swamp creatures in Washington). Is that why he is hated so much by the left? He did not conform to the political expectations of the deep state!

But I do understand the constitution and am quite aware of those who do not.

Yes I made and error the point still stands.

I would say some people can be fooled most of the time. Proved by many liberal ideological posts.

No typo, Why did you not name the person who in politics who has withstood more?

I haven’t been discussing all NY judges, just Merchan who is obviously biased in this case. The judge is apparently very touchy reacting the way he did over an eye roll. Clearing the courtroom???? Was that so few would see his over the top rant?

You are mistaken. Witnesses can be gagged by the court. If there was any fairness with this judge Cohen should have been.

Desperate people do desperate things. I think many liberals are in panic mode right now because of the poles. So far nothing has worked, Trump is stronger than ever. It has gotten to the point where some want him gone, like permanently if you catch my drift. Why would some liberals propose a...

This shows your misunderstanding of Dershowitz's position. He is a protector of the constitution and the legitimate rule of law. He is not a MAGA apologist nor a fan of Trump. Facts that Trump hating liberals cannot grasp.

I'm not caught up in blaming liberals they are doing a fantastic job of showing their true motives everyday. I agree totally! I disagree totally!

They wouldn't give the defense multiple reasons to appeal if they really cared. Come on let's get real, destroying Trump, keeping him off of the campaign trail, draining him finacially, hoping a conviction will destroy his chance of election are the only goal of the swamp here. The "rule of law...

Irrelevant ,their qualifications being professors of law with years of courtroom experience makes their analysis extremely credible except to those bent on the destruction of Trump. Irrelevant, to observing the court room shoddiness of Merchant. Even a inexperienced in the law person can see...

Really, a man only concerned with saving his own hide couldn't come up with something against Trump to save himself. Your point makes no sense at all.