Kylie
Defeater of Illogic
Right (let us suppose), so we should see caterpillars turning partially into butterflies and butterflies creating bigger and smaller caterpillars - no? Burning the candle at both ends?
I've explained this to you several times now.
A caterpillar turning into a moth is NOT the result of a mutation.
Right (let us suppose) and if the alternative to a mutation is "strong internal consistency" (among adaptations) then the process (of Evolution) is approximate not forced.
Approximate faith, is ultimately far stronger than any direct forcing (of mutation, for example).
This makes no sense whatsoever. Evolution is a process. Saying something is an approximate evolution makes no sense whatsoever.
Monkeys become Humans, but caterpillars are always caterpillars.
You are in danger of contradicting everything Evolution stands for?
My position has never been inconsistent. If you think it has been, it is only because you don't understand evolution.
Stop trying to box truth in. Science is not strong enough to determine what truth should or shouldn't be (it is truth that determines science).
I doubt you'll find anyone who actually understands science who would disagree with me.
Yes but as long as you are in this world, post the fall, you must address good and evil. It's part of our history, not part of our imagination!
The nature of good and evil are totally irrelevant to the topic of evolution and genetics.
Upvote
0