• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Search results

  1. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    It's comments like this that reinforce the idea that you're not here for a serious and honest discussion about anything.
  2. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    Cannot disagree with that either.
  3. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    ... got to be honest, I don't see that happening any time shortly. Too many Creationists focus too much on the Points Refuted A Thousand Times, or like how 1Tonne came into this whole thing by quote-mining something Darwin wrote to twist it into something that he didn't say and refusing to...
  4. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    Oh that is true, sadly.
  5. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Do proponents of the evolutionary theory know their own history?

    They kind of do, despite the claims and lies from others.
  6. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    Doesn't really mean what you think it means.
  7. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    Or we know when a question of yours isn't worth answering.
  8. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Do proponents of the evolutionary theory know their own history?

    Which is wholly and demonstrably incorrect. Racists never needed science to make racist claims, and in fact, evolutionary theory makes the point that racism is complete bunk. Eugenics, social-Darwinism, racism in general, were already being propagated by people using the Bible and institutions...
  9. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Icons of Evolution

    No, you say He laughs. Not the same thing at all.
  10. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    Again: the obfuscation isn't going to work,.
  11. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    None of that is true though.
  12. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    Nope.
  13. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    Yeah, the obfuscation won't work here.
  14. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    I just don't agree with a literal reading of Genesis because God's creation doesn't match up with the Biblical account. And since the Bible was written by man and God's creation cannot lie...
  15. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    Ah, okay. Thought that I was wrong on something and was prepared to be taught something new.
  16. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    Do correct me on where I go wrong, but I honestly can't see the distinction between that and what I said.
  17. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    I miss @Mountainmike
  18. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    An from what I've seen around here, many people need to remember that door swings both ways.
  19. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    So really, this thread has gone from MountainMike's bog-standard "Oh, it's not evolution I'm against. It's DARWINIAN EVOLUTION", to a singular Biblical literalist just basically decided to turn the thread into their personal apologetics. Ugh. Doing the same as @Bradskii, I'm unsubscribing from...
  20. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    Intelligent Design doesn't have any explanatory power. It is the simplest and purest example of post hoc ergo propter hoc - it starts with the premise and then has to work backwards to justify their logic. That is not sound science in any shape or form and is nothing more than religious dogma...
Top Bottom