Is the Biden administration interfering with the election?

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Dec 3, 2006
2,774
1,161
59
Saint James, Missouri
✟75,207.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

In March 2021, Joe Biden signed an executive order focused on "access to voting," directing federal government agencies to bolster voter registration efforts, facilitate mail-in voting applications for Americans, and tackle misinformation, among other provisions. This order encapsulates the Democratic Party agenda, embedding numerous practices implemented temporarily during the pandemic-impacted 2020 election.


Three years later, the House GOP is now investigating the Biden administration after documents revealed that the White House has been coordinating with left-wing activists on voter registration.
"GOP lawmakers are growing increasingly worried that an executive order issued by President Joe Biden in 2021, which mandated that federal agencies develop voter registration plans with 'approved' outside groups, will be unlawfully weaponized this November to boost Democratic turnout," reports the Washington Examiner. "The Biden administration has framed the unprecedented operation as nonpartisan, though internal documents show the government hosted a July 2021 order planning call that appeared to serve overwhelmingly as a platform for left-wing organizations to suggest sweeping election policy changes."


“President Biden’s EO is an overreach of the executive branch’s constitutional authority and disregards the Constitution’s federalist election system,” House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said in a statement to the Washington Examiner. “The states set the time, manner, and place of their own elections, and this EO must be looked at seriously.”

House Republican Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY) said the internal meeting notes reveal “illegal coordination” between the Biden administration and progressive activists to plot “election interference,” adding that lawmakers are investigating the 2021 executive order “to ensure our elections are free and fair.” Stefanik is widely considered as in the running to be former President Donald Trump’s vice presidential pick in 2024.
Republican lawmakers and conservative legal scholars argue that the executive order is unconstitutional and disregards several federal regulations. Among these are the Antideficiency Act, which prohibits federal agencies from exceeding approved funds allocated by Congress, and the Hatch Act, which restricts government employees from participating in specific political endeavors.

According to meeting notes obtained by the conservative Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project and Foundation for Government Accountability, participants from activist organizations deliberated on various topics, such as registering illegal immigrants and incorporating voter registration as a prerequisite in federal law for public housing.


The Oversight Project underscored in a recent memo its belief that the 2021 executive order is a partisan endeavor aimed at shaping future election outcomes by leveraging federal resources, infrastructure, and influence.
Like other lawmakers, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) said the meeting notes reveal a coordinated and since-secretive effort by Biden to work with progressives “to figure out a way to leverage federal resources and enhance Democrat political power.”

Earlier this week, the House GOP introduced the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act to prevent illegal immigrants and noncitizens from voting in federal elections. As you can imagine, Democrats have indicated they have no intention of supporting the bill. This really puts the border crisis into perspective, doesn't it?
 

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
3,886
2,385
24
WI
✟130,912.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

In March 2021, Joe Biden signed an executive order focused on "access to voting," directing federal government agencies to bolster voter registration efforts, facilitate mail-in voting applications for Americans, and tackle misinformation, among other provisions. This order encapsulates the Democratic Party agenda, embedding numerous practices implemented temporarily during the pandemic-impacted 2020 election.


Three years later, the House GOP is now investigating the Biden administration after documents revealed that the White House has been coordinating with left-wing activists on voter registration.
"GOP lawmakers are growing increasingly worried that an executive order issued by President Joe Biden in 2021, which mandated that federal agencies develop voter registration plans with 'approved' outside groups, will be unlawfully weaponized this November to boost Democratic turnout," reports the Washington Examiner. "The Biden administration has framed the unprecedented operation as nonpartisan, though internal documents show the government hosted a July 2021 order planning call that appeared to serve overwhelmingly as a platform for left-wing organizations to suggest sweeping election policy changes."


“President Biden’s EO is an overreach of the executive branch’s constitutional authority and disregards the Constitution’s federalist election system,” House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said in a statement to the Washington Examiner. “The states set the time, manner, and place of their own elections, and this EO must be looked at seriously.”

House Republican Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY) said the internal meeting notes reveal “illegal coordination” between the Biden administration and progressive activists to plot “election interference,” adding that lawmakers are investigating the 2021 executive order “to ensure our elections are free and fair.” Stefanik is widely considered as in the running to be former President Donald Trump’s vice presidential pick in 2024.
Republican lawmakers and conservative legal scholars argue that the executive order is unconstitutional and disregards several federal regulations. Among these are the Antideficiency Act, which prohibits federal agencies from exceeding approved funds allocated by Congress, and the Hatch Act, which restricts government employees from participating in specific political endeavors.

According to meeting notes obtained by the conservative Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project and Foundation for Government Accountability, participants from activist organizations deliberated on various topics, such as registering illegal immigrants and incorporating voter registration as a prerequisite in federal law for public housing.


The Oversight Project underscored in a recent memo its belief that the 2021 executive order is a partisan endeavor aimed at shaping future election outcomes by leveraging federal resources, infrastructure, and influence.
Like other lawmakers, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) said the meeting notes reveal a coordinated and since-secretive effort by Biden to work with progressives “to figure out a way to leverage federal resources and enhance Democrat political power.”

Earlier this week, the House GOP introduced the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act to prevent illegal immigrants and noncitizens from voting in federal elections. As you can imagine, Democrats have indicated they have no intention of supporting the bill. This really puts the border crisis into perspective, doesn't it?
It seems that both parties attempt to interfere (as well as external forces such as the Kremlin), to varying degrees with the elections, though for the most part, elections have been fair. We should however, ensure that votes are done by US citizens, as we do not want elections to be swayed. Some say the student loan forgiveness plan might buy votes from young voters, which I partially agree with, as students tend to be more liberal. At least the EU overseas does not have the problem of expensive tuition, but the EU has the same problem as us: The Kremlin*.

Here are three types of interference in our country, not ranked in any particular order. Which one am I most scared of? I am not sure. All three sound frightening.

1. Foreign Interference
*FBI Report on Russians: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 U.S. ELECTIONS | Federal Bureau of Investigation
Bipartisan report on Russians: Press | Intelligence Committee

2. Far-right interference
Arizona Election Interference: Arizona indicts 18 in election interference case, including Giuliani and Meadows

3. Democrat Interference
Student Loan Forgiveness: Biden's student loan forgiveness rejected: 'Not buying my vote'
This PBS article discusses the issues with immigrants voting: How often do non-US citizens vote in Wisconsin elections?

Fair usage from PBS
1715386348362.png
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Your lips move but I can't hear what you're saying
Aug 19, 2018
16,336
11,086
71
Bondi
✟260,721.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
In March 2021, Joe Biden signed an executive order focused on "access to voting," directing federal government agencies to bolster voter registration efforts, facilitate mail-in voting applications for Americans, and tackle misinformation, among other provisions.
And this is a bad thing because..?
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Your lips move but I can't hear what you're saying
Aug 19, 2018
16,336
11,086
71
Bondi
✟260,721.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Because who determines what misinformation is?
If Biden says that inflation was 9% when he took office, that was easily shown to be 'misinformation'. When Trump said 'In February alone, nearly 1 million jobs held by native-born Americans disappeared' the same applies.

How difficult do you see this being? Why can't an honest bi-partisan group fulfill that need?
 
Upvote 0

Adam56

Active Member
Nov 4, 2023
375
90
Nashville
✟26,281.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
If Biden says that inflation was 9% when he took office, that was easily shown to be 'misinformation'. When Trump said 'In February alone, nearly 1 million jobs held by native-born Americans disappeared' the same applies.

How difficult do you see this being? Why can't an honest bi-partisan group fulfill that need?
You only have two examples

Also, why can’t people do their own research? Do you see people as stupid sheep?
 
Upvote 0

NxNW

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2019
4,979
3,663
NW
✟197,876.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
In March 2021, Joe Biden signed an executive order focused on "access to voting," directing federal government agencies to bolster voter registration efforts, facilitate mail-in voting applications for Americans, and tackle misinformation, among other provisions. This order encapsulates the Democratic Party agenda, embedding numerous practices implemented temporarily during the pandemic-impacted 2020 election.
What's wrong with supporting voter registration?
Three years later, the House GOP is now investigating the Biden administration after documents revealed that the White House has been coordinating with left-wing activists on voter registration.
"GOP lawmakers are growing increasingly worried that an executive order issued by President Joe Biden in 2021, which mandated that federal agencies develop voter registration plans with 'approved' outside groups, will be unlawfully weaponized this November to boost Democratic turnout," reports the Washington Examiner.
Weaponized? There's that word again. Who's gonna be killed?
“President Biden’s EO is an overreach of the executive branch’s constitutional authority and disregards the Constitution’s federalist election system,” House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said in a statement to the Washington Examiner. “The states set the time, manner, and place of their own elections, and this EO must be looked at seriously.”
If that last sentence is true, then why is the GOP suing states over election policy?
Earlier this week, the House GOP introduced the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act to prevent illegal immigrants and noncitizens from voting in federal elections. As you can imagine, Democrats have indicated they have no intention of supporting the bill.
There is no need to support it. Illegal Immigrants and noncitizens already don't vote.
This really puts the border crisis into perspective, doesn't it?
There is no border crisis. Trump built the wall and Mexico paid for it. Right?
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Your lips move but I can't hear what you're saying
Aug 19, 2018
16,336
11,086
71
Bondi
✟260,721.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
You only have two examples

Also, why can’t people do their own research? Do you see people as stupid sheep?
The examples are just that. Examples. And being misinformed is not the same as being stupid. Did you accept the thrust of the OP or did you do some digging into the veracity of the claims? I spent about 15 minutes reading three separate accounts of the matter. Maybe you did as well. Or maybe you didn't. Did you check to see if the inflation rate Biden quoted was right? Or the employment losses by Trump?

If you didn't then how would you know if what was presented was factually true? Not everyone has the time to check every single claim presented to them. I think that politicians should be held to account for 'bending the truth'. Scopes does a good job, but maybe it should be more formalised.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Larniavc
Upvote 0

Adam56

Active Member
Nov 4, 2023
375
90
Nashville
✟26,281.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The examples are just that. Examples. And being misinformed is not the same as being stupid. Did you accept the thrust of the OP or did you do some digging into the veracity of the claims? I spent about 15 minutes reading three separate accounts of the matter. Maybe you did as well. Or maybe you didn't. Did you check to see if the inflation rate Biden quoted was right? Or the employment losses by Trump?

If you didn't then how would you know if what was presented was factually true? Not everyone has the time to check every single claim presented to them. I think that politicians should be held to account for 'bending the truth'. Scopes does a good job, but maybe it should be more formalised.
I spent the time reading. What’s your point?
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
25,180
13,743
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟375,281.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
It's a carbon copy of 2019.

Trump indicates hesitation around accepting results if he loses.

Immediate uptick in accusations to couch empty accusation.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hans Blaster

Rocket surgeon
Mar 11, 2017
15,590
12,439
54
USA
✟309,636.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
In March 2021, Joe Biden signed an executive order focused on "access to voting," directing federal government agencies to bolster voter registration efforts, facilitate mail-in voting applications for Americans, and tackle misinformation, among other provisions. This order encapsulates the Democratic Party agenda, embedding numerous practices implemented temporarily during the pandemic-impacted 2020 election.

No. Encouraging people to vote, making it easier to register is just promoting participation in our democracy. If that isn't part of the other party's agenda, what is wrong with them?
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Your lips move but I can't hear what you're saying
Aug 19, 2018
16,336
11,086
71
Bondi
✟260,721.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I spent the time reading. What’s your point?
I dislike emoticons, but one signifying a sigh would be suitable right here.

I've already made my point. That was the reason for my post. Pointing out the problem, why it exists and suggesting a solution.
 
Upvote 0

Adam56

Active Member
Nov 4, 2023
375
90
Nashville
✟26,281.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I dislike emoticons, but one signifying a sigh would be suitable right here.

I've already made my point. That was the reason for my post. Pointing out the problem, why it exists and suggesting a solution.
Problem is that could very easily be abused. I don’t think we should introduce censorship because some people are lazy.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Your lips move but I can't hear what you're saying
Aug 19, 2018
16,336
11,086
71
Bondi
✟260,721.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Problem is that could very easily be abused. I don’t think we should introduce censorship because some people are lazy.
Did you know that the majority of people in Kansas support mail in elections? No, of course you didn't. It's not something on your radar. But if someone used that as a political argument, would you take the time to check it? My guess is that you'd do as most people do, including me - accept what I'm being told as long as it's from a source that I trust. So you wouldn't. But that might sway your opinion regarding one party or another whether it was true or not.

Is it true? Well I have no idea. I just made that up. But if a news outlet that you trust said it, because they picked it up on another outlet who quoted someone saying it, that was based on an unconfirmed report of some official responding to a claim a guy made on Youtube...well, you get my drift.

Or maybe you don't. But no-one has mentioned censorship. Because correcting lies is not censorship.
 
Upvote 0

perplexed

Senior Member
Jun 22, 2005
2,123
499
51
✟111,969.00
Faith
Seeker
According to meeting notes obtained by the conservative Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project and Foundation for Government Accountability, participants from activist organizations deliberated on various topics, such as registering illegal immigrants and incorporating voter registration as a prerequisite in federal law for public housing.
Nothing wrong with that , illegal immigrants should be able to vote because the government has some control over their lives and if someone is given government housing they should be forced to vote for the political party that favors public housing.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Adam56

Active Member
Nov 4, 2023
375
90
Nashville
✟26,281.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Did you know that the majority of people in Kansas support mail in elections? No, of course you didn't. It's not something on your radar. But if someone used that as a political argument, would you take the time to check it? My guess is that you'd do as most people do, including me - accept what I'm being told as long as it's from a source that I trust. So you wouldn't. But that might sway your opinion regarding one party or another whether it was true or not.

Is it true? Well I have no idea. I just made that up. But if a news outlet that you trust said it, because they picked it up on another outlet who quoted someone saying it, that was based on an unconfirmed report of some official responding to a claim a guy made on Youtube...well, you get my drift.

Or maybe you don't. But no-one has mentioned censorship. Because correcting lies is not censorship.
It’s a slippery slope to censorship.
 
Upvote 0

Adam56

Active Member
Nov 4, 2023
375
90
Nashville
✟26,281.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Nothing wrong with that , illegal immigrants should be able to vote because the government has some control over their lives and if someone is given government housing they should be forced to vote for the political party that favors public housing.
Great replacement 101
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
21,105
17,559
✟1,447,860.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
"GOP lawmakers are growing increasingly worried that an executive order issued by President Joe Biden in 2021, which mandated that federal agencies develop voter registration plans with 'approved' outside groups, will be unlawfully weaponized this November to boost Democratic turnout," reports the Washington Examiner. "The Biden administration has framed the unprecedented operation as nonpartisan, though internal documents show the government hosted a July 2021 order planning call that appeared to serve overwhelmingly as a platform for left-wing organizations to suggest sweeping election policy changes."

Who are these "approved outside groups"?
What are the alleged "sweeping election policy changes"?

Could they possibly involve registering more citizens to vote? I suppose that activity is now viewed as "election interference". SMH
 
Upvote 0

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
9,892
5,707
Utah
✟730,092.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

In March 2021, Joe Biden signed an executive order focused on "access to voting," directing federal government agencies to bolster voter registration efforts, facilitate mail-in voting applications for Americans, and tackle misinformation, among other provisions. This order encapsulates the Democratic Party agenda, embedding numerous practices implemented temporarily during the pandemic-impacted 2020 election.


Three years later, the House GOP is now investigating the Biden administration after documents revealed that the White House has been coordinating with left-wing activists on voter registration.
"GOP lawmakers are growing increasingly worried that an executive order issued by President Joe Biden in 2021, which mandated that federal agencies develop voter registration plans with 'approved' outside groups, will be unlawfully weaponized this November to boost Democratic turnout," reports the Washington Examiner. "The Biden administration has framed the unprecedented operation as nonpartisan, though internal documents show the government hosted a July 2021 order planning call that appeared to serve overwhelmingly as a platform for left-wing organizations to suggest sweeping election policy changes."


“President Biden’s EO is an overreach of the executive branch’s constitutional authority and disregards the Constitution’s federalist election system,” House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said in a statement to the Washington Examiner. “The states set the time, manner, and place of their own elections, and this EO must be looked at seriously.”

House Republican Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY) said the internal meeting notes reveal “illegal coordination” between the Biden administration and progressive activists to plot “election interference,” adding that lawmakers are investigating the 2021 executive order “to ensure our elections are free and fair.” Stefanik is widely considered as in the running to be former President Donald Trump’s vice presidential pick in 2024.
Republican lawmakers and conservative legal scholars argue that the executive order is unconstitutional and disregards several federal regulations. Among these are the Antideficiency Act, which prohibits federal agencies from exceeding approved funds allocated by Congress, and the Hatch Act, which restricts government employees from participating in specific political endeavors.

According to meeting notes obtained by the conservative Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project and Foundation for Government Accountability, participants from activist organizations deliberated on various topics, such as registering illegal immigrants and incorporating voter registration as a prerequisite in federal law for public housing.


The Oversight Project underscored in a recent memo its belief that the 2021 executive order is a partisan endeavor aimed at shaping future election outcomes by leveraging federal resources, infrastructure, and influence.
Like other lawmakers, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) said the meeting notes reveal a coordinated and since-secretive effort by Biden to work with progressives “to figure out a way to leverage federal resources and enhance Democrat political power.”

Earlier this week, the House GOP introduced the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act to prevent illegal immigrants and noncitizens from voting in federal elections. As you can imagine, Democrats have indicated they have no intention of supporting the bill. This really puts the border crisis into perspective, doesn't it?
Both parties are corrupt ... both parties are after control. Regardless who is in power ... it is what the Lord says will happen. Mankind will degrade to the point of (like just before God sent the flood) and we are well on our way down that road .... all the deterioration in the world we see happening points to that His return is near ... and AMEN!!! Even so, come Lord Jesus!!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums