Recent content by BNR32FAN

You’d have to ignore the entire surrounding context of each statement to conclude that these verses are not talking about fathers having sons. The only way anyone could possibly come to the conclusion that this usage isn’t about fathers having sons is if they are dead set against the idea. Can...

As a pledge of my faith to God.

Wow lol you think that killing Stephen was in accordance of God’s commandments in the Old Testament? You really don’t know anything about what Jesus taught about the Pharisees do you. Every time Jesus corrected the Pharisees He quoted the scriptures, the Old Testament scriptures. He quoted the...

Then answer is no Peter did NOT say that water baptism saves someone. “Corresponding to that, baptism now saves you not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a good conscience through the resurrection of Jesus Christ,” ‭‭1 Peter‬ ‭3‬:‭21‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬ See, in your...

I could say the same because you declined to answer my question who was Abraham talking to in Genesis 18? Abraham was the first Jew and he was talking to God face to face in Genesis 18. Jesus said no on had seen The Father and no one had descended from heaven except Him. So who was Abraham...

Lol so you saw my point and now you’re going to pretend that you didn’t. Who was Abraham talking to? That’s all I’m asking. I answered all of your questions. Abraham was talking to God face to face. Was it God The Father or was it Jesus?

I just answered that question where I calculated the genealogies for you. Your the one saying there’s gaps, not me, so you show me where the gaps are.

“This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day when God created man, He made him in the likeness of God. He created them male and female, and He blessed them and named them Man in the day when they were created. When Adam had lived one hundred and thirty years, he became the father of...

Well if you’re not interested in discussing where the gaps are then you shouldn’t use it as an argument in the discussion. You’re saying the Bible doesn’t give us the age of the earth because there are gaps in the genealogies but you don’t know where they are, then how can you say that the Bible...

I can’t speculate on why people are coming up with different numbers without knowing what method they’re using, can I? That’s like asking why does it take Bill 10 minutes to change a tire but it takes Ted 20 minutes when I’ve never seen either of them change a tire. How am I supposed to answer...

Ok this is the same argument I hear all the time that God included the years each father had his son for no apparent reason at all. I mean you show someone something in the scriptures that they don’t want to believe and they’ll find any excuse in the world not to believe it.

For example? I’m guessing you’re referring to the differences in Matthew & Luke? They’re really irrelevant because we already know that Abraham lived 2000BC.

Lol if the Bible gave an actual age for the earth just as an example if the Bible s specifically said that the earth is 6,000 years old it would be wrong next year. So how do you include an age for the earth in the Bible that would never be incorrect? Well a genealogy from the first man to the...

How does this even relate to the genealogies? There’s no question that Abraham lived 2,000 BC so why would Issac and Ishmael even matter? I’m not sure what his point is here.

I have no idea how this is relevant to the discussion.