PDA

View Full Version : "Thou shalt not steal" from Seventh-day Adventists


Your Neighbor
11th April 2008, 09:50 PM
"Thou shalt not steal" from Seventh-day Adventists our name.
"Thou shalt not steal" from Seventh-day Adventists our beliefs.

So it is with many among our people who have drifted away from the old landmarks and who have followed their own understanding. What a great relief it would be to such could they quiet their conscience with the belief that my work is not of God.
Testimonies for the Church Volume Five (1882-1889), page 66, paragraph 1

No line of truth that has made the Seventh-day Adventist people what they are is to be weakened. We have the old landmarks of truth, experience, and duty, and we are to stand firmly in defense of our principles, in full view of the world.
Testimonies for the Church Volume Six (1901), page 17, paragraph 2 After the truth has been proclaimed as a witness to all nations, every conceivable power of evil will be set in operation, and minds will be confused by many voices crying, "Lo, here is Christ, Lo, He is there. This is the truth, I have the message from God, He has sent me with great light." Then there will be a removing of the landmarks, and an attempt to tear down the pillars of our faith.
Maranatha (1976), page 189, paragraph 3
The enemy of souls has sought to bring in the supposition that a great reformation was to take place among Seventh-day Adventists, and that this reformation would consist in giving up the doctrines which stand as the pillars of our faith, and engaging in a process of reorganization. Were this reformation to take place, what would result? The principles of truth that God in His wisdom has given to the remnant church, would be discarded. Our religion would be changed. The fundamental principles that have sustained the work for the last fifty years would be accounted as error. A new organization would be established. Books of a new order would be written. A system of intellectual philosophy would be introduced. The founders of this system would go into the cities, and do a wonderful work. The Sabbath of course, would be lightly regarded, as also the God who created it. Nothing would be allowed to stand in the way of the new movement. The leaders would teach that virtue is better than vice, but God being removed, they would place their dependence on human power, which, without God, is worthless. Their foundation would be built on the sand, and storm and tempest would sweep away the structure.
Selected Messages Book 1 (1958), page 204, paragraph 2

Your Neighbor
11th April 2008, 10:12 PM
Seventh-day Adventists had better learn from the stealing of the Worldwide Church of God from within itself.

http://www.northwood.edu/staff/grover/sb-wcg1.txt

Ellen G. White noted, "We have far more to fear from within than from without. The hindrances to strength and success are far greater from the church itself than from the world" (Selected Messages, 1:122)

honorthesabbath
12th April 2008, 06:43 AM
Thank you for this thread YN, in reading the link you posted, I see the language is much like we are witnessing from those who want to change the SDA church. Their battle cry is to go MAINSTREAM!

Why or why would they even consider going mainstream when they know perfectly well that those churches are teaching heresies? Why do they want to 'follow the multitude to do evil' or to 'follow every wind of doctrine'?

You would think that they would be thankful that God had at one time called them out of Babylon.

thecountrydoc
12th April 2008, 07:48 AM
WELL SAID!!!

YBIC,
Doc

CaDan
12th April 2008, 12:08 PM
The entity that "owns" the name is the General Conference Corporation of Seventh Day Adventists, not any individual or group of individuals related to this forum.

icedragon101
12th April 2008, 03:44 PM
The entity that "owns" the name is the General Conference Corporation of Seventh Day Adventists, not any individual or group of individuals related to this forum.
now someone is thinking stright. finally some commonsense

TrustAndObey
12th April 2008, 03:47 PM
Then I say "Believers in Seventh-day Adventism" or possibly even "Sabbath-keeping Adventists".

:)

CaDan
12th April 2008, 04:02 PM
Then I say "Believers in Seventh-day Adventism" or possibly even "Sabbath-keeping Adventists".

:)

Those names might be even more confusing. :(

We're trying to navigate a tricky course here at Internet speed.

Your Neighbor
12th April 2008, 05:44 PM
Seventh-day Adventism is OK to me as a title of a section of the forum.

TrustAndObey
12th April 2008, 05:53 PM
Seventh-day Adventism is OK to me as a title of a section of the forum.

That's pretty perfect indeed.

mva1985
12th April 2008, 05:59 PM
Those names might be even more confusing. :(

We're trying to navigate a tricky course here at Internet speed.

True

Seventh-day Adventism is OK to me as a title of a section of the forum.

I like it!!!!

OntheDL
12th April 2008, 06:16 PM
The entity that "owns" the name is the General Conference Corporation of Seventh Day Adventists, not any individual or group of individuals related to this forum.

Hi,

If you don't already know this, the legal actions of GC with regard to protect its trademark name is far from a slam dunk.

The gay Seventh-day Adventist group has succeeded in its defense of using the name in their title.

In 1987 the Seventh-day Adventist Church filed legal action with the State of California in an attempt to prohibit SDA Kinship from using the name "Seventh-day Adventist" and the abbreviation "SDA." On October 3, 1991, United States District Judge Mariana R. Pfaeizer ruled that Seventh-day Adventist Kinship International, Inc. did not infringe on the Seventh-day Adventist Church's use of the name and that Kinship may continue to use the identifying name.

CaDan
12th April 2008, 06:47 PM
Hi,

If you don't already know this, the legal actions of GC with regard to protect its trademark name is far from a slam dunk.

The gay Seventh-day Adventist group has succeeded in its defense of using the name in their title.

In 1987 the Seventh-day Adventist Church filed legal action with the State of California in an attempt to prohibit SDA Kinship from using the name "Seventh-day Adventist" and the abbreviation "SDA." On October 3, 1991, United States District Judge Mariana R. Pfaeizer ruled that Seventh-day Adventist Kinship International, Inc. did not infringe on the Seventh-day Adventist Church's use of the name and that Kinship may continue to use the identifying name.

On the other hand, the GC succeeded in protecting its mark in the Perez case.

CaDan
13th April 2008, 11:07 AM
Discussion being moved to a single thread here: http://christianforums.com/t7135126-the-thread-for-discussing-the-forum-name-change.html