PDA

View Full Version : Islam’s ‘Public Enemy #1


SolomonVII
26th March 2008, 09:13 PM
Zakaria Botros (http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NTUwY2QyNjA0NjcwMjExMzI2ZmJiZTEzN2U1YjYyZjE)


Though he is little known in the West, Coptic priest Zakaria Botros (http://www.fatherzakaria.net/) — named Islam’s “Public Enemy #1” by the Arabic newspaper, al-Insan al-Jadid — has been making waves in the Islamic world. Along with fellow missionaries — mostly Muslim converts — he appears frequently on the Arabic channel al-Hayat (i.e., “Life TV”). There, he addresses controversial topics of theological significance — free from the censorship imposed by Islamic authorities or self-imposed through fear of the zealous mobs who fulminated against the infamous cartoons of Mohammed. Botros’s excurses on little-known but embarrassing aspects of Islamic law and tradition have become a thorn in the side of Islamic leaders throughout the Middle East.

Botros is an unusual figure onscreen: robed, with a huge cross around his neck, he sits with both the Koran and the Bible in easy reach. Egypt’s Copts — members of one of the oldest Christian communities in the Middle East — have in many respects come to personify the demeaning Islamic institution of “dhimmitude” (which demands submissiveness from non-Muslims, in accordance with Koran 9:29). But the fiery Botros does not submit, and minces no words. He has famously made of Islam “ten demands (http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP94305),” whose radical nature he uses to highlight Islam’s own radical demands on non-Muslims.

↓ Keep reading this article (http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NTUwY2QyNjA0NjcwMjExMzI2ZmJiZTEzN2U1YjYyZjE=#more) ↓

What can you tell us about this Copt?

ContraMundum
27th March 2008, 11:03 AM
I am currently reading his biography (http://orders.koorong.com/search/details.jhtml?code=0977560228)- he's a great man.

SolomonVII
29th March 2008, 04:38 AM
The story about the hadith on adult breast-feeding was hilarious. I can remember reading that on Memri before, and wondering where in the sam h did that one come from?!! It was just too strange to be understandable.
So it was Father Zakaria all along, strirring up the hornets nest, demonstrating with crystal clarity how ridiculous it is to make the obscure laws of the medieval period the basis for modern life.
For the ulema, it is either take the hadith and the Islamic legalism in general with a grain of salt, to modernize the fiath, or become a laughing-stock and a target among Muslims themselves. That is the choice Father Botros leads his Moslem audience to, apparently broadcast after broadcast.

For a religion that insists that their book was dictated word for word and dot for dot by Allah himself, and that the ahadith are the correct interpetation fo that book, this must be a very hard pill to swallow.

Likely the worst fear of the Islamists is that other religions will actually get a fair hearing and be given full tolerance and respect in Muslim countries, just as Islam is given such legal protection in other countries right now. Islam has always depended on the humiliation and grinding, grating, long-term repression of other religions practictioners to keep the numbers of other faiths low in their lands.

Were people actually fully and fairly allowed to pick and choose their faith, and to not face a series of demeaning laws for being of another faith, or even face the death penalty for converting from Islam, this could be very bad news for Islamic demographics indeed!

With that in mind, the pope's firm stance of reciprocity as the one pre-conditions for any dialogue with Islam may be finally paying off. Quatar is finally alowing a church to be built on its lands, in the interest in fairness and fair play. There are rumblings in the distance too that Saudi Arabi may eventually concede on this point as well. That would be a real turning point!

Still, there is a long ways to go, and the hurdles to get to full repricocity are immense. Is there even a verse in the entire Koran, for instance, that does not go on a rant against the disbelievers or faiths outside of Islam?
Wit this in mind, what finally got the Islamists in the UN to change their mind about adding an anti-blasphemy law to the UN code was the 'gotcha' moment when they realized that any wording of a law that prevented Islam from being criticized would thereby necessitate that Muslims too do not subject other people's religions to their own criticisms-even the loathsome polythiests that Islam has always abhorred!

Still, it is good to know that globalization is finally working for the repressed Coptic Church. Even repressive Islamic regimes are now finding that information is becoming very hard to control indeed when you become opened up to the internet and satellites television without borders. Modern technology wit its indifference to borders is not so easily controlled by nation-states anymore.The favorite tools of the terrorist misinformation are now becoming the own worst nightmare for Islamsists of all stripes.

This is free speech and freedom of expression in action. This is the hope that free speech actually exposes us all to, if we only allow for it. This is the Achilles heel of the Islamists. As long as we meet their demands for acceptance with demands of reciprocity that appeal to a sense of fair play, Islam becomes very vulnerable indeed.

copticorthodoxy
29th March 2008, 11:10 PM
His site
http://www.fatherzakaria.net/

Globalnomad
30th March 2008, 11:08 AM
I heard very good things about him. May God bless his work!

Kas
4th April 2008, 07:24 AM
the brother is a don and an example to all Christians

here is another

go to youtube...

check out

pfander films