PDA

View Full Version : What is the fundie position on Tattoos?


Revolution81
6th February 2008, 01:59 AM
I want to get a tattoo of a cross or some other symbol to be a permanent reminder to me of what it means to be a follower of christ, but many people tell me that its wrong in the eyes of the lord.

what do you think?

NewGuy101
6th February 2008, 02:48 AM
thats coo, several of my friends have one.

BigNorsk
6th February 2008, 03:36 AM
One's position on tattoos is not considered a fundamental of the faith. As such there is no fundamentalist position on tattoos.

Instead of getting a tattoo, I would think it would be better to save lives by donating blood. The two are not very compatible. You wouldn't be able to donate for at least a year, and if in response to the tattoo you become serologically positive for blood born diseases you never would be able to donate. Serologically positive is not the same as developing the disease.

Marv

rmw8855
10th February 2008, 03:43 PM
Based on Leviticus, I would say God doesn't approve of tattoos.

Leviticus 19:28 (NKJV)
You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor tattoo any marks on you: I am the LORD.

NewGuy101
11th February 2008, 02:03 AM
Based on Leviticus, I would say God doesn't approve of tattoos.

Leviticus 19:28 (NKJV)
You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor tattoo any marks on you: I am the LORD.
Can please take the context of the verse? thanks.

Tattoos are fine.

rmw8855
11th February 2008, 02:33 PM
NewGuy,

I am obviously missing something. Please explain how the context of the verse changes the meaning in this case.

The chapter starts of with:

And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto all the congregation of the children of Israel, and say unto them, Ye shall be holy: for I the LORD your God am holy.

and then proceeds to make of list of do's & don'ts.

Thank you.

NewGuy101
11th February 2008, 03:44 PM
NewGuy,

I am obviously missing something. Please explain how the context of the verse changes the meaning in this case.

The chapter starts of with:

and then proceeds to make of list of do's & don'ts.

Thank you.
The verse is speaking about having tattoos for ritual purposes. Hence why it says no cutting yourself for the dead.

BTW I dont like tattoos for aesthetic purposes but they are not unbiblical. Several of my friends on our fundie churches have one.

Revolution81
12th February 2008, 12:23 AM
Based on Leviticus, I would say God doesn't approve of tattoos.

Leviticus 19:28 (NKJV)
You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor tattoo any marks on you: I am the LORD.
The verse directly above that says 'do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip the edges of your beard' Lev 19:27 (NIV) .

Does that mean that God doesn't approve of this either?

DeaconDean
12th February 2008, 02:56 AM
What we have here, is, failure ta communicate.


let me lay out some rules for our Non-Fundamentalist members:

The Forum Specific Rules are as follows:

1) Fundamentalists (as defined above), as well as all members of the Congregational Forums can post fellowship threads here. Only Fundamentalist (as defined above) members are allowed to post debate threads to discuss various doctrines to do with their own denomination and other denominations as long as they are within our rules.

2) Non-Fundamentalist (as defined above) members can only post fellowship posts here or posts to ask a question regarding Fundamentalist doctrine. Once the question is answered, there shall be no debate over the answer in this forum by the Non-Fundamentalist members. Any debate posts by Non-Fundamentalist members will be deleted. In other words, only Fundamentalist members can debate here.

3) No posts that denigrate a Christian denomination or Christian group will be tolerated - these will be deleted and the poster will be warned.

4) Basically, we do NOT allow accusations that a particular Christian denomination or group is non-Christian. That is the bottom line. Debates regarding doctrine is allowed (for Fundamentalist members only). Accusations are not.


http://christianforums.com/t672730-rules-for-this-forum-read-before-posting-updated-6-16-05.html

Guests can debate in the formal inter-denominational debating forum or formal debating area outside the entire congregational fora. To retain this forum a safe haven for the fundamentalists, we don't allow guests to debate the fundamentalist doctrines stated here.

http://christianforums.com/t6397447-guidelines-for-the-fundamentalist-forum.html

Please be aware, that once a question is answered, that is the end of discussion.

Asking another question in return is by definition debating.

Please be aware of our rules and respect for our beliefs.

Carry on.

God Bless

Till all are one.

Revolution81
12th February 2008, 04:06 AM
why can only fundamentalists debate?

what is the point of that?

Revolution81
12th February 2008, 04:08 AM
and for the record my question was intended for clarification not debate

DeaconDean
12th February 2008, 04:23 AM
why can only fundamentalists debate?

Because this is the "Ask a Fundamenatalist" area.

God Bless

Till all are one.

DeaconDean
12th February 2008, 04:31 AM
And to reiterate:

Debate: 1. to deliberate; consider. 2. To engage in argument by discussing opposing points. 3. To engage in a formal discussion or argument.

The American Heritage Dictionary, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 2nd College Edition.

And this thread is dangerously close to debating.

Please be aware of this.

God Bless

Till all are one.

Revolution81
12th February 2008, 06:56 AM
oh so we can debate, just not in this thread?

NewGuy101
12th February 2008, 11:05 AM
debate here (http://christianforums.com/f830-debate-with-a-fundamentalist.html)