View Full Version : I finaly got to report some one for a very rude post.
rockytrails
21st January 2008, 11:17 PM
I am so excited i looked hi and low Just waiting for the chance to report some one! ANY ONE! for a very rude post
And to my surprise. i WAS ABLE TO FIND ONE THAT FIT THAT VERY DISCRIPTION!
sorry for raising my voice but i am so excited on my good bust! of some one else for a change i Just had to tell every one about it.:clap:
I reported the rev for his indecent post of hillary clinton
That post is sure to cause nightmares even amoung the very bravest of us.
sorry rev But even you must admit i made a very good bust.
I think it will cost you at Least a zillion points
but after a year of good behavior they should let you out of prision.
Aibrean
21st January 2008, 11:21 PM
...I still barely understand anything you write.
seajoy
21st January 2008, 11:23 PM
RT....what on earth are you talking about?
DaRev
21st January 2008, 11:25 PM
I don't think the mods will appreciate your using the Report function for your amusement.
FYI, you'll need to report one of the Mods for posting the very same picture. I'm sure that'll go over like a lead balloon.
seajoy
21st January 2008, 11:27 PM
FYI, you'll need to report one of the Mods for posting the very same picture. I'm sure that'll go over like a lead balloon.
I think he would snicker about it. ^_^
Lupinus
21st January 2008, 11:28 PM
....uhm.
Ok? :scratch:
rockytrails
21st January 2008, 11:39 PM
I don't think the mods will appreciate your using the Report function for your amusement.
FYI, you'll need to report one of the Mods for posting the very same picture. I'm sure that'll go over like a lead balloon.
oh yea well this is what i think. Get him hillary!
http://www.michaeltotten.com/archives/images/Hillary%20Clinton.jpg
seajoy
21st January 2008, 11:40 PM
:doh: :swoon:
porterross
21st January 2008, 11:47 PM
...I still barely understand anything you write.
Word!
silentbrian33
21st January 2008, 11:52 PM
lemonparty.org
DaRev
22nd January 2008, 12:03 AM
oh yea well this is what i think. Get him hillary!
:eek: :eek: For shame!!!
RadMan
22nd January 2008, 09:42 AM
Rockytrail this is an adult site and not a childish, vindictive place to see if we can get "one up" on someone. I have been reported numerous times and have gotten more flack than anyone else on this site but..................I don't take it personally. We have tempers rise in here occasionally but the bottom line is we are Christians and try to treat each other as such. Well at least most of the time. :|
BabyLutheran
22nd January 2008, 11:51 AM
Can't wait to see what you do to me for this pic of HillBilly!
http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w294/namtrag/hillBilly.jpg
PreachersWife2004
22nd January 2008, 12:01 PM
The use of the report button for kicks can net a person a one month ban as it falls under the category of harassment.
We take our reports very seriously, so frivolous reporting like this can really get in the way of us doing our jobs.
I think it was in poor taste to report the post for an what you considered an indecent pic, only for you to repost the pic here in this thread. That shows me that you were not serious at all about your report.
Ever heard of the boy who cried wolf? I'm gonna have to wonder if and when you report another post if you're actually being serious about it.
You shouldn't treat the report button as a game, Rocky.
Zecryphon
22nd January 2008, 02:02 PM
The use of the report button for kicks can net a person a one month ban as it falls under the category of harassment.
We take our reports very seriously, so frivolous reporting like this can really get in the way of us doing our jobs.
I think it was in poor taste to report the post for an what you considered an indecent pic, only for you to repost the pic here in this thread. That shows me that you were not serious at all about your report.
Ever heard of the boy who cried wolf? I'm gonna have to wonder if and when you report another post if you're actually being serious about it.
You shouldn't treat the report button as a game, Rocky.
PW, shouldn't this thread have been locked as it's whole point is talking about a reported post? I thought discussing reported posts in the open forum was a violation of CF protocol.
PreachersWife2004
22nd January 2008, 04:15 PM
It's borderline. I debated closing it, but it seems as though people have been having a bit of fun with it. I'm not sure if there's anything against someone actually saying they reported a post...seems a bit silly for the reporter to do that since the info is kept confidential. It's staff actions that aren't supposed to be talked about. But it's a very fine line. If another mod wants to come in and close the thread, that would be fine with me.
I still think there's a big joke going on here.
LilLamb219
22nd January 2008, 05:18 PM
Reasonable confidentiality will be respected by Staff and Members, alike.
Issues with staff decisions should be taken to the staff member, then the reconciliation team, period. Don't post them, don't PM them to others, don't take them to Lee.
That is a portion of the Rules for the site. As PW stated, it's a fine line as to whether or not a violation of those rules has occurred.
Edial
23rd January 2008, 01:20 PM
I think I'll report DaRev for not joining ELCA ...
Ed
seajoy
23rd January 2008, 01:21 PM
I think I'll report DaRev for not joining ELCA ...
Ed
I'm thinkin' he won't care if you do! ^_^
NordicLutheran
23rd January 2008, 05:16 PM
I think I agree with everyone, I've never been able to understand RT's posts.
BabyLutheran
23rd January 2008, 05:48 PM
The polite term is that they are very obtuse.
I am scared because I actually understand RT's posts most of the time.
DaRev
23rd January 2008, 05:59 PM
I think I'll report DaRev for not joining ELCA ...
Ed
Can I just plead "no contest" now?
^_^
porterross
23rd January 2008, 06:05 PM
The polite term is that they are very obtuse.
I am scared because I actually understand RT's posts most of the time.
Are you drinking heavily when you read them? ^_^
PreachersWife2004
23rd January 2008, 06:40 PM
Okay guys, let's be careful and continue to have fun, rather than have this thread turn into something a little more personal!
I think I will report the next person who uses the word ain't.
RadMan
23rd January 2008, 06:47 PM
Okay guys, let's be careful and continue to have fun, rather than have this thread turn into something a little more personal!
I think I will report the next person who uses the word ain't.I just reported you because you used the "A" word. :P :D
LilLamb219
23rd January 2008, 06:47 PM
Didn't you just use it? :P
LilLamb219
23rd January 2008, 06:47 PM
Ah, Rad beat me to it!
BabyLutheran
23rd January 2008, 06:52 PM
Ain't ain't a word
PreachersWife2004
23rd January 2008, 08:30 PM
Well ain't that the truth! :P
LilLamb219
23rd January 2008, 08:31 PM
So, what's it a contraction of I wonder?
MarkRohfrietsch
23rd January 2008, 08:32 PM
Well ain't that the truth! :P
Yup, we ain't seen nuthin yet.
RadMan
23rd January 2008, 08:34 PM
aint not :)
Derivative of "tain't". Like "tain't so"
Edial
23rd January 2008, 08:51 PM
Can I just plead "no contest" now?
^_^
Too late ... I gave up already. ... ... :)
Edial
23rd January 2008, 08:56 PM
I just reported you because you used the "A" word. :P :D
It ain't nice to use such words ...
Edial
23rd January 2008, 08:59 PM
It looks like this entire sub-forum needs to be reported ...
Radiata
23rd January 2008, 10:12 PM
Sorry seajoy. Look what happened when I used firefox on CF. Your CF Character moved to where it shouldn't have.
http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff278/Radiata4/hilery.jpg
porterross
23rd January 2008, 10:25 PM
Okay guys, let's be careful and continue to have fun, rather than have this thread turn into something a little more personal!
I think I will report the next person who uses the word ain't.
Are you telling us to behave? :scratch:
Rotsa ruck with that, Beckie. ^_^
seajoy
24th January 2008, 01:17 AM
Sorry seajoy. Look what happened when I used firefox on CF. Your CF Character moved to where it shouldn't have.
http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff278/Radiata4/hilery.jpg
And in just my underwear!!! How on earth did that happen?!! :blush: :eek: :swoon:
seajoy
24th January 2008, 01:27 AM
At least I'm punching her in the nose. :pink:
Zecryphon
24th January 2008, 11:24 AM
At least I'm punching her in the nose. :pink:
Or you could be seen as having Hillary kiss your derriere. LOL
LilLamb219
24th January 2008, 11:28 AM
She looks more like she's about to devour you, seajoy!
seajoy
24th January 2008, 11:33 AM
Or you could be seen as having Hillary kiss your derriere. LOL
Good grief, Zec!!!!!!!! :doh: :help:
seajoy
24th January 2008, 11:35 AM
She looks more like she's about to devour you, seajoy!
Sounds like that could be an idea for a horror film for sure. :eek: :swoon:
Zecryphon
24th January 2008, 11:45 AM
Good grief, Zec!!!!!!!! :doh: :help:
Look it was either that or that you had farted up her nose. Which one do you prefer? I'm good with either. LOL
seajoy
24th January 2008, 11:54 AM
Look it was either that or that you had farted up her nose. Which one do you prefer? I'm good with either. LOL
The latter! ^_^
DaRev
24th January 2008, 12:15 PM
Trying to chase the devil out of her? ^_^
Zecryphon
24th January 2008, 12:21 PM
The latter! ^_^
Some women deny that they fart at all, so I took the least offensive with the knowledge I had at that time. Now that I know you do fart, you will be the butt of many a fart joke from now on. LOL
seajoy
24th January 2008, 01:21 PM
Some women deny that they fart at all, so I took the least offensive with the knowledge I had at that time. Now that I know you do fart, you will be the butt of many a fart joke from now on. LOL
Gee, thanks Zec :doh: this thread has certainly turned into a "rude" one. :)
MarkRohfrietsch
24th January 2008, 10:06 PM
Gee, thanks Zec :doh: this thread has certainly turned into a "rude" one. :)
Sombody better report it!:ebil:^_^
BreadAlone
24th January 2008, 10:16 PM
:eek: *Slowly backs out of thread..* :D
DaRev
24th January 2008, 10:31 PM
This thread really stinks.
PreachersWife2004
24th January 2008, 11:19 PM
Not as bad as this...
http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j111/PezGirl1973/fart-dog.jpg
DaRev
24th January 2008, 11:29 PM
Poor kitty.
mrshoperose
24th January 2008, 11:48 PM
So, what's it a contraction of I wonder?
Nobody answered her question....
I think it's a contraction of "are not is not"......
Please correct me if I am wrong.
mrshoperose
24th January 2008, 11:49 PM
Not as bad as this...
http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j111/PezGirl1973/fart-dog.jpg
That's kitten abuse!
Zecryphon
25th January 2008, 10:42 AM
That's kitten abuse!
Does that mean that that dog is going to grow up to be a serial killer now?
JoeCatch
25th January 2008, 01:32 PM
Nobody answered her question....
I think it's a contraction of "are not is not"......
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Regarding ain't and the correctness thereof:
It's a contraction of "am not." It's been in use just as long as any of the other common contractions in the English language (e.g., can't, isn't, doesn't, etc.); the only reason it's considered incorrect is that 19th c. prescriptivist grammarians were prejudiced against it for some reason. Even though its pedigree was just as well-established of those of its fellow contractions, prescriptivists associated it with the lower classes, so it was deemed incorrect. Users of ain't ended up with the last laugh, though, because it was the grammarians' refusal to prescribe its proper use that eventually led to its more widespread use beyond merely being a contraction for "am not." Now we see "ain't" being used as a contraction for "is not," "have not," "are not," etc., and we have primarily the very grammarians who sought to stamp it out to blame for that.
RadMan
25th January 2008, 02:21 PM
Regarding ain't and the correctness thereof:
It's a contraction of "am not." It's been in use just as long as any of the other common contractions in the English language (e.g., can't, isn't, doesn't, etc.); the only reason it's considered incorrect is that 19th c. prescriptivist grammarians were prejudiced against it for some reason. Even though its pedigree was just as well-established of those of its fellow contractions, prescriptivists associated it with the lower classes, so it was deemed incorrect. Users of ain't ended up with the last laugh, though, because it was the grammarians' refusal to prescribe its proper use that eventually led to its more widespread use beyond merely being a contraction for "am not." Now we see "ain't" being used as a contraction for "is not," "have not," "are not," etc., and we have primarily the very grammarians who sought to stamp it out to blame for that.Ain't that the truth. :D
Oh ---that's not the correct usage, well then "I ain't gonna say ain't no more, I ain't."
Copyright ©2000-2008, ChristianForums.com