PDA

View Full Version : Dr. Ron Paul on Foreign Interventionism


SpyridonOCA
16th January 2008, 02:31 AM
Given that American interventionism has been responsible for the suffering of Orthodox Christians all over the world, especially in bombing Serbia on Pascha Sunday, and supporting the Turkish persecution of Orthodox Christians, I recommend reading this speech by Congressman Ron Paul which was given shortly after 9/11, an act of retaliation against American involvement in the Middle East. If there is any part of this speech which you find inaccurate, please provide a counterargument. It isn't good enough to just say that Ron Paul is a freedom-loving whack job.


September 25, 2001

Ron Paul speech in the House of Representatives

Mr. Speaker:

Last week was a bad week for all Americans. The best we can say is that the events have rallied the American spirit of shared love and generosity. Partisanship was put on hold, as it well should have been. We now, as a free people, must deal with this tragedy in the best way possible. Punishment and prevention is mandatory. We must not, however, sacrifice our liberties at the hand of an irrational urgency. Calm deliberation in our effort to restore normalcy is crucial. Cries for dropping nuclear bombs on an enemy not yet identified cannot possibly help in achieving this goal.

Mr. Speaker, I returned to Congress 5 years ago out of deep concern about our foreign policy of international interventionism, and a monetary and fiscal policy I believed would lead to a financial and dollar crisis. Over the past 5 years I have frequently expressed my views on these issues and why I believed our policies should be changed...

http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2001/cr092501.htm

JustinHesychast
16th January 2008, 07:15 PM
Ron Paul 4 Pres 2008!

That is all. :P

SpyridonOCA
16th January 2008, 08:15 PM
Ron Paul's presidential campaign isn't about the man but the message, that the people should be free to govern themselves, just as our founding fathers intended.

JustinHesychast
16th January 2008, 08:30 PM
Which makes him so amazing. :D

Lukaris
17th January 2008, 09:59 AM
Ron Paul for president 2008.

SpyridonOCA
17th January 2008, 08:47 PM
Obama happens to be my second choice. I don't know whether to caucus for Obama or Paul. I like them both.

Lukaris
18th January 2008, 01:55 PM
Obama happens to be my second choice. I don't know whether to caucus for Obama or Paul. I like them both.
You have so strongly supported Ron Paul and now you would consider a candidate that is approved by vested interests that maintain a system of loyalty to corporations for cheap & cruel labor in places like China, oil interests who support the Saudi royal family, free flow illegal immigration, perpetual wars etc.?????

SpyridonOCA
18th January 2008, 10:59 PM
I don't know whether you are being fair to Obama.

Bushmaster78FS
21st January 2008, 03:26 AM
I would only hope that one of them is elected into the office Spyridon. See I am in the military, their stink won't touch me much, but you will have a blessed experience under them. I hope that will come true, and maybe you will become rusmeister numero dos... :D

Lukaris
21st January 2008, 10:27 AM
I don't know whether you are being fair to Obama.
I did not just mean him, I mean any candidate selected by the special interests that perpetuate this wretched 2 party monopoly that is destoying American democracy. So if you had mentioned McCain, Clinton etc. I would have questioned your choice. Please do not take this personally, all of us Americans are suffering from this broken 2 party system that is destoying the USA and will end up supporting policies that Ron Paul seems to offer an alternative to.

Dorothea
21st January 2008, 05:04 PM
Obama happens to be my second choice. I don't know whether to caucus for Obama or Paul. I like them both.
So, you're first choice is a pro-life candidate, and your second is a pro-abortion candidate who signed a bill or some such document in IL where if a baby is born alive in an abortion procedure, the baby cannot be revived, but left to die. How can anybody who's a human being agree to that? And with that, how can someone support a person that agreed to this horrific action?

SpyridonOCA
23rd January 2008, 02:14 AM
'Wedding video' contradicts US denials



Staff and agencies
Monday May 24, 2004
Guardian Unlimited (http://www.guardian.co.uk/)

A videotape emerged today apparently showing the wedding party in Iraq that survivors say was attacked by US warplanes last week in raids that killed up to 45 people...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1223563,00.html


Fun times in the Persian Gulf!!!