ahh.....

[Addicted2~Jesus]

So.. not only is this goin to be a disaster as usual... we'll lose all the previous threads as well huh? Are we allowed to be sef banned yet?? Er are folks still foolin round wit the statistic nonsense? In the past Erwin refused to allow folks to deny their membership... is it goin to remain as such? What a joke...........

[constance]

So.. not only is this goin to be a disaster as usual... we'll lose all the previous threads as well huh? Are we allowed to be sef banned yet?? Er are folks still foolin round wit the statistic nonsense? In the past Erwin refused to allow folks to deny their membership... is it goin to remain as such? What a joke...........


No threads are lost. PM Ravenscape.

I think we are still doing self-bans. PM Geocajun if you are interested.

[Addicted2~Jesus]

I beg to differ, the threads might as well be lost, I tried several of em last night, couldn't respond to any of em. So while they are "archived" it's pointless... completely pointless. Less there's some sort of a bug that I donno bout... I couldn't respond to anythin. Each of em, regardless of what they were all acted as if they were closed even though none of em say as much.

Bannin is one thin, how bout the membership statistics? How would that effect it? To be banned isn't enuogh in my opinion. It'd be meaninless if the record of bein a member of this place wasn't reflective.

[constance]

I beg to differ, the threads might as well be lost, I tried several of em last night, couldn't respond to any of em. So while they are "archived" it's pointless... completely pointless. Less there's some sort of a bug that I donno bout... I couldn't respond to anythin. Each of em, regardless of what they were all acted as if they were closed even though none of em say as much.
Support can't move them all at once. Any threads you want moved, let Ravenscape know, and she will move them and reopen them.

Bannin is one thin, how bout the membership statistics? How would that effect it?
I have no idea. Statistically, it wouldn't make a significant difference when compared to the 85gajillion socks and one-use accounts.

To be banned isn't enuogh in my opinion. It'd be meaninless if the record of bein a member of this place wasn't reflective.
So...because you can't have your account deleted, you'd stay in a place you don't want to be?

[Addicted2~Jesus]

I think your misunderstandin me. What would be the point to be banned yet still listed as a member? That I believe was the entire point bout Erwin an his wantin to be the biggest site etc etc etc all that stuff.

Its bad enough I blew God's money on this place to have it go to hell like it has, an as it continues to do so. I would not wish to further support a 'site' by even claimin to be a member.

I wouldn't consider a ban if it didn't also reflect statistics of membership. So it would be an insignificant change? Certainly you do not mean to imply a single user on this site is insignificant? I know better it's a retorihical question. Er however ya spell it. I would think though, if there were such records, the amount of those who've left because of this er that an had the choice to remove thier membership would be rather high. Of course, none of us have a way to actually prove this one way er the other.