View Full Version : New rules
Jim47
1st November 2007, 07:40 PM
Our CC forum specific rules are no longer in effect. This announcement has been made in the new staff forums by our senior staffer.
There will be updates in the rule/faq soon, but for now please use the site wide rules as a guide.
And would CC staff please unstick all CC forum specific rules and bans.
Once the new rules are posted I believe you will have some guidelines as to what you are allowed to do with special rules.
Lisa0315
1st November 2007, 07:44 PM
I want to be reimbursed for all the wasted time and effort, please! :D
Lisa
Indrid Cold
1st November 2007, 07:54 PM
Strike 0
Lisa0315
1st November 2007, 08:02 PM
Hey! I got a strike but never got a PM about it.
What is up with that?
Lisa
Jim47
1st November 2007, 08:03 PM
Hey! I got a strike but never got a PM about it.
What is up with that?
Lisa
They were probably afraid of you!! :P
Nadiine
1st November 2007, 08:04 PM
I have another Kazoo to blow now
:clap:
**BLOWING KAZOO**
:clap:
I appreciate this especially after the recent spite report wars....
So thanks to everyone involved with this rule decision. I look forward to a forum with some semblance of peace - it was our goal all along (I think we just went around the mountain for 40 years to get there). :swoon:
*slams head into wall* :help:
Rep Daddy
1st November 2007, 08:06 PM
Our CC forum specific rules are no longer in effect. This announcement has been made in the new staff forums by our senior staffer.
There will be updates in the rule/faq soon, but for now please use the site wide rules as a guide.
And would CC staff please unstick all CC forum specific rules and bans.
Once the new rules are posted I believe you will have some guidelines as to what you are allowed to do with special rules.
Was this announced to OBOB and other Congregational Fora?
Is this ALL congregations or are we being targeted?
:mad:
Lisa0315
1st November 2007, 08:07 PM
I have another Kazoo to blow now
:clap:
**BLOWING KAZOO**
:clap:
I appreciate this especially after the recent spite report wars....
So thanks to everyone involved with this rule decision. I look forward to a forum with some semblance of peace - it was our goal all along (I think we just went around the mountain for 40 years to get there). :swoon:
*slams head into wall* :help:
I am happy about the LeeD announcement but how will it help the forum? Not sure I am clear on that...
Lisa
Rep Daddy
1st November 2007, 08:13 PM
I do not see this announcement in OBOB, SR, WWMC.
WHY just US ????
ContentInHim
1st November 2007, 08:27 PM
Steve, if this is not in the other congregational fora it must mean that only our rules caused heartburn. But we knew that, didn't we? :)
Lisa0315
1st November 2007, 08:28 PM
:doh:
Or there is a rational logical explanation...
Lisa
Nadiine
1st November 2007, 08:28 PM
I do not see this announcement in OBOB, SR, WWMC.
WHY just US ????
ok.... I thought this was just our mods that altered the CC rules for us due to the mass spite reporting??? :scratch:
Color me confused. I dunno.
ContentInHim
1st November 2007, 08:31 PM
LeeD announced that his OP post in Announcements would become basic 4U rules. But I did think he said he would consider whether different congregations could have additional rules. But that thread is soooo long and my eyes are way tooo tired to re-read it. Steve is saying that Jim47's OP here apparently ONLY APPLIES TO CCC - probably because we are such a pain in the backside to the whole 4U site!
CC member and proud of it! :thumbsup:
Rep Daddy
1st November 2007, 08:31 PM
This is OUTRAGEOUS (http://foru.ms/showpost.php?p=40339339&postcount=38)
My reply
So a majority of our mods are swept aside and ordered to comply?
*sigh* CC is toast.
Jim47
1st November 2007, 08:33 PM
The main reason I posted this was that I know we have a point system here which works towards an fsb. That will no longer be in effect as CC rules are, but we will have new rules and new ban procedures soon. I posted this a caution only so no one would get banned under rules which are no longer in place. Is that wrong? :confused:
Rep Daddy
1st November 2007, 08:34 PM
The main reason I posted this was that I know we have a point system here which works towards an fsb. That will no longer be in effect as CC rules are, but we will have new rules and new ban procedures soon. I posted this a caution only so no one would get banned under rules which are no longer in place. Is that wrong? :confused:
Who directed you to post this in OUR forum? Why is this not posted in other congregational fora.
I will ask until you answer.
Hentenza
1st November 2007, 08:39 PM
Part of LeeD's announcement protects the congregational fora. The announcement is here (http://foru.ms/showpost.php?p=40274972&postcount=1). The rule reads like this:
Congregational Forums wishing to remain safe havens may choose to limit debate to members of their own denomination, insist that all posts conform to their creed etc.
The only part of our rules that does not apply is the FSB rules, however, the SoF and the no debate rules still apply. ONLY members of CC are allowed to debate and post non fellowship posts in this forum.
ContentInHim
1st November 2007, 08:40 PM
This is OUTRAGEOUS (http://foru.ms/showpost.php?p=40339339&postcount=38)
My reply
I expect to receive a nastygram any minute myself.
I've about had it with all mods above our own. :sigh:
NewGuy101
1st November 2007, 08:42 PM
I expect to receive a nastygram any minute myself.
I've about had it with all mods above our own. :sigh:
Especially the "conservative" ones above the reg CC mods.
Rep Daddy
1st November 2007, 08:43 PM
CiH, your comment was right on target. They can sweep it under the rug, but you are right.
Rep Daddy
1st November 2007, 08:44 PM
Looks like a power-play in the wake of major change. That often happens. It is less noticed that way.
Jim47
1st November 2007, 08:48 PM
Part of LeeD's announcement protects the congregational fora. The announcement is here (http://foru.ms/showpost.php?p=40274972&postcount=1). The rule reads like this:
Congregational Forums wishing to remain safe havens may choose to limit debate to members of their own denomination, insist that all posts conform to their creed etc.
The only part of our rules that does not apply is the FSB rules, however, the SoF and the no debate rules still apply. ONLY members of CC are allowed to debate and post non fellowship posts in this forum.
This is not true Henry, its been posted in the admin forum by next in command to Lee.
ContentInHim
1st November 2007, 08:49 PM
Especially the "conservative" ones above the reg CC mods.
I'm proud of our mods - they did the right thing and were steamrollered by the Admins. I think I'm going to download that whole thread for historical purposes. :sick:
Looks like a power-play in the wake of major change. That often happens. It is less noticed that way.
Well, maybe we should make it noticeable? :P
ladybug1980
1st November 2007, 08:52 PM
Part of LeeD's announcement protects the congregational fora. The announcement is here (http://foru.ms/showpost.php?p=40274972&postcount=1). The rule reads like this:
Congregational Forums wishing to remain safe havens may choose to limit debate to members of their own denomination, insist that all posts conform to their creed etc.
What about if someone who is not a member of a certain congregational forum (for example, I am not a member of the Eastern Orthodox forum but I like to occasionally post there to ask questions) who wants to inquire about information regarding the denomination of that forum? For learning purposes? Would they not allowed to do this?
Rep Daddy
1st November 2007, 08:54 PM
I'm proud of our mods - they did the right thing and were steamrollered by the Admins. I think I'm going to download that whole thread for historical purposes. :sick:
Well, maybe we should make it noticeable? :P
Way ahead of ya.
Appeal (http://foru.ms/showpost.php?p=40340189&postcount=1)
ContentInHim
1st November 2007, 08:54 PM
I was able to email myself the whole page from reports - so if it gets "disappeared", we can still reference it.
I wonder if we can launch an appeal for Auntie?
Rep Daddy
1st November 2007, 08:55 PM
I was able to email myself the whole page from reports - so if it gets "disappeared", we can still reference it.
I wonder if we can launch an appeal for Auntie?
Done (http://foru.ms/showpost.php?p=40340189&postcount=1)
ContentInHim
1st November 2007, 08:55 PM
Way ahead of ya.
Appeal (http://foru.ms/showpost.php?p=40340189&postcount=1)
Cool. :thumbsup:
Nadiine
1st November 2007, 08:57 PM
*asking nicely*
Can somebody who understands what's going on w/ the admin. over our mods & rule details please explain it in layperson's terms as to what's going on?
Thanks for any help.
Hentenza
1st November 2007, 08:57 PM
This is not true Henry, its been posted in the admin forum by next in command to Lee.
Is the announcement not true? Are other congregational forums also loosing their identity? Can I now go debate in other congregational fora where I am not a member?
I am a Baptist so can anyone now debate in the Baptist forum? Can anyone debate in the Catholic forum? Can anyone debate in TAW?
Rep Daddy
1st November 2007, 08:59 PM
This is not true Henry, its been posted in the admin forum by next in command to Lee.
LINK/text ???
D'Ann
1st November 2007, 09:00 PM
The day that even one of the Congregational forums is not a safe haven, is the day that none of them are safe havens. If we go down, so does every other Congregational forum.
Jim, please quote from Lee where he has stated what you posted in our CC forum. I know you are doing your best and your intentions are good.
IamRedeemed
1st November 2007, 09:05 PM
I saw this in Lee's post which I think pretty much validates what Hen said: :scratch:
"Congregational Forums wishing to remain safe havens may choose to limit debate
to members of their own denomination, insist that all posts conform to their creed etc."
This is not true Henry, its been posted in the admin forum by next in command to Lee.
Jim47
1st November 2007, 09:06 PM
Jim, please quote from Lee where he has stated what you posted in our CC forum. I know you are doing your best and your intentions are good.
It wasn't Lee, it was his right hand man and its posted only in the admin/SA forum for now.
ContentInHim
1st November 2007, 09:07 PM
Does this mean that non-WOF can post in WOF now? :confused:
Rep Daddy
1st November 2007, 09:08 PM
Who directed you to post this in OUR forum? Why is this not posted in other congregational fora.
I will ask until you answer.
Asked time TWO.
Nadiine
1st November 2007, 09:11 PM
sits in the corner picking lint off the cat
:sorry:
Nadiine
1st November 2007, 09:11 PM
this place is going to give me an ulcer one day
Rep Daddy
1st November 2007, 09:13 PM
Jim, your profile says...
http://www3.foru.ms/images/userinfo/staff.gif Administrator
Congregation, Non-Nicene Congregations.
Why not leave us alone and referee the Mormons.
ContentInHim
1st November 2007, 09:13 PM
sits in the corner picking lint off the cat
:sorry:
Listening to the crickets?
IamRedeemed
1st November 2007, 09:15 PM
:thumbsup: HIP HIP HORAAY for our Mods!
You guys DID DO RIGHT!
http://dl10.glitter-graphics.net/pub/92/92000hg6u0pha74.gif (http://www.glitter-graphics.com)
I'm proud of our mods - they did the right thing and were steamrollered by the Admins. I think I'm going to download that whole thread for historical purposes. :sick:
Well, maybe we should make it noticeable? :P
Jim47
1st November 2007, 09:15 PM
Closing thread for a cool off period.
Nadiine
1st November 2007, 09:16 PM
Listening to the crickets?
rofl
(better that than 'the voices in my head') ^_^
Jim47
1st November 2007, 10:43 PM
Closing thread for a cool off period.
Here is an update that I have been given permission to post, but this thread will remain closed until I have been given futher word.
Until otherwise stated, FSRs should be treated as guidelines for posting.
Copyright ©2000-2008, ChristianForums.com