Interest in New Forum

[amadeus2]

Hello,

We attempting to start a Judaeo-Christian forum. This will be similar to the non-denominational forum but with no requirement to accept a trinity or not. Thus far only the following three rules will apply:

. #1. Belief that Jesus is divine, and that he came from the Father in the flesh.

#2. That salvation is found through Jesus.

#3. Jesus and the disciples taught the keeping of Yahwahs commandments.

Anyone interested in adding their support or obtaining more details please check or ask questions at:

http://foru.ms/t6305973-judaeo-christian-forum.html

[Lisa0315]

I will come visit perhaps, but I would have to wait to see what your final rules looked like before I would join. The part that bothers me is the "keeping the laws" bit. No offense intended, just explaining.

Lisa

[MichaelTheeArchAngel]

I will come visit perhaps, but I would have to wait to see what your final rules looked like before I would join. The part that bothers me is the "keeping the laws" bit. No offense intended, just explaining.

Lisa Rev 12:17. Then the dragon was enraged at the woman and went off to make war against the rest of her offspring—those who obey God's commandments and hold to the testimony of Jesus.
Rev 14:12. This calls for patient endurance on the part of the saints who obey God's commandments and remain faithful to Jesus.

[Lisa0315]

Rev 12:17. Then the dragon was enraged at the woman and went off to make war against the rest of her offspring—those who obey God's commandments and hold to the testimony of Jesus.
Rev 14:12. This calls for patient endurance on the part of the saints who obey God's commandments and remain faithful to Jesus.

Not really the right place for this brother, but I will bite. Mods can move it if they need to.

Keeping God's commandments are a bit different from keeping the law. I do have to love the Lord my God and my neighbor and the rest of it will follow. I do not have to keep purity laws or dietary laws, etc. That is our liberty in Christ.

Lisa

[Nadiine]

the history with this group is, they didn't join the Non denom. area mainly because they rejected the Trinity clause in it - they don't actually classify that Jesus is God (deity).
That might be a concern to conservatives who I do believe accept Jesus as God if not the trinity.

[NewGuy101]

the history with this group is, they didn't join the Non denom. area mainly because they rejected the Trinity clause in it - they don't actually classify that Jesus is God (deity).
That might be a concern to conservatives who I do believe accept Jesus as God if not the trinity.
no thanks...:eek:

[Tavita]

the history with this group is, they didn't join the Non denom. area mainly because they rejected the Trinity clause in it - they don't actually classify that Jesus is God (deity).
That might be a concern to conservatives who I do believe accept Jesus as God if not the trinity.

I hope you aren't talking about me as part of the group, Nadiine. I have just recently gone back to my Anglican roots and that is why I'm not joining the Non-Denom forum. And I do classify Jesus as God. I have supported Michael needing to have his own forum and now I'm waiting to see if he insists on keeping the OT Laws. I have stated in the thread that if he does that I won't be joining. If not, then I don't mind supporting the forum and debating and discussing with people their varying beliefs.

And I'd also like to point out that as ND's they were pushed out.

[Lisa0315]

Its probably my fault since I engaged y'all in a discussion. However, our rules do state that non-members can only fellowship here in this part of the forum. I really did not mean to get this started and it may have caused you to think that it was okay. Especially when I said that the mods could move it...However, I did not mean that the discussion should turn into about one of our members, you know?

Sorry if I caused this...

Lisa

[GreenMunchkin]

Moved to the debate sub-forum

[Lisa0315]

Thank you Greenie! :hug:

Lisa

[Simon_Templar]

I don't mind these guys having their own forum, but it shouldn't have the word "Christian" in the title.

[Nadiine]

I hope you aren't talking about me as part of the group, Nadiine. I have just recently gone back to my Anglican roots and that is why I'm not joining the Non-Denom forum. And I do classify Jesus as God. I have supported Michael needing to have his own forum and now I'm waiting to see if he insists on keeping the OT Laws. I have stated in the thread that if he does that I won't be joining. If not, then I don't mind supporting the forum and debating and discussing with people their varying beliefs.

And I'd also like to point out that as ND's they were pushed out.
Tavita I'll explain this later today after I work out & get back from church... I have to go right now.

But I do want to address this with you.

[Tavita]

Tavita I'll explain this later today after I work out & get back from church... I have to go right now.

But I do want to address this with you.

I think this is the part you want to address:

And I'd also like to point out that as ND's they were pushed out.

I should rephrase that. As ND's they 'felt' they were pushed out. Whether it was for good or not, that's how they felt. It wasn't really a choice for them. If they don't believe in the trinity then of course they're not going to lie and say they do just to be able to join. And of course others did believe in the trinity but didn't believe in having such rules for ND.

I don't want to get into a debate or anything here with you Nadiine. I shouldn't have put that line in there.. apologies.

[Nadiine]

I think this is the part you want to address:



I should rephrase that. As ND's they 'felt' they were pushed out. Whether it was for good or not, that's how they felt. It wasn't really a choice for them. If they don't believe in the trinity then of course they're not going to lie and say they do just to be able to join. And of course others did believe in the trinity but didn't believe in having such rules for ND.

I don't want to get into a debate or anything here with you Nadiine. I shouldn't have put that line in there.. apologies.
Oh, no problem... I don't want a debate either Tavita.. frankly I'm pooped out. (I felt like I was coming down with a cold & just kinda run down... so I don't exactly feel like getting tangled back up in some big issue that gets intense & I'm sure you don't either.

I'll reply after church later today :wave:

[IamRedeemed]

Well, that is a problem right there. It is against what the Scripture declares
from the get go. and what Christ Himself has declared.
Apparently they are believing in and teaching "another Jesus" and if it is
"another Jesus" then it is "another Gospel". 2 Corinthians 11:4



the history with this group is, they didn't join the Non denom. area mainly because they rejected the Trinity clause in it - they don't actually classify that Jesus is God (deity).
That might be a concern to conservatives who I do believe accept Jesus as God if not the trinity.

[Tavita]

Well, that is a problem right there. It is against what the Scripture declares
from the get go. and what Christ Himself has declared.
Apparently they are believing in and teaching "another Jesus" and if it is
"another Jesus" then it is "another Gospel". 2 Corinthians 11:4




You'll be VERY happy to know that the whole idea has been scrapped and MichaelTheeArchAngel has closed the thread down for lack of support and opposition.

It's very easy to point the finger at some groups and say they worship another Jesus. I think some mainline denominations worship another Jesus but I'm not going to go public with it. It's not my place.