PDA

View Full Version : Difference between Free & United Methodist


Filia Mariae
14th October 2003, 09:17 PM
Simply out of curiousity, what is the difference between the two?

Lanakila
15th October 2003, 12:49 AM
I think they are different groups of Methodists. The United Methodists are one denomination (rather large) of Methodists. Wesleyans are another group, and Nazerenes come from the Methodist/Holiness tradition as well.

Plan 9
15th October 2003, 05:14 PM
I can answer this question if you ask it in another forum. :)

Filia Mariae
15th October 2003, 09:07 PM
You mean IDD?

wvmtnkid
16th October 2003, 10:02 AM
I am a United Methodist and I have asked the same question about the differences between the United and Free Methodist. I have been told that there is just a slight difference in the discipline of the two. The Free Methodist add to their discipline, or maybe it was membership vows, that the members take a membership pledge basically not to consume alcohol or drugs. That's what I was told was the difference.

I would like to see what Plan 9 says too, to see if I was told correctly! :) If it is asked in another forum, can someone post the link here?

Plan 9
16th October 2003, 10:31 AM
I am a United Methodist and I have asked the same question about the differences between the United and Free Methodist. I have been told that there is just a slight difference in the discipline of the two. The Free Methodist add to their discipline, or maybe it was membership vows, that the members take a membership pledge basically not to consume alcohol or drugs. That's what I was told was the difference.

I would like to see what Plan 9 says too, to see if I was told correctly! :) If it is asked in another forum, can someone post the link here?
The MEC minister who started the Free Methodist Church wished to add "four freedoms" to the discipline, but, after saying that I could explain, I found to my horror that I could only remember one. :blush:

I feel certain that you're correct and that one "free" constitutes a temperance pledge. Another of the "frees" is "freedom from fraternal organizations".
We have two of the four and there were some other differences at the time the split occured, in addition to the "four frees".

I haven't yet had time to look up the specifics, but I'll do that shortly and get back to you.

In the meantime, I'll leave you with a quip a Free Methodist made to me.

"Well, the Free Methodist Church isn't really free,



but it is relatively inexpensive."

OnederWoman
16th October 2003, 10:59 AM
I grew up United Methodist and my Mom is now a United Methodist minister... but I really have no idea. The only thing I know is that once there was a Northern Methodist church and a Southern Methodist church... this being during the Civil War... after the war the Northern and Southern Methodist churches decided to combine... thus was born the United Methodist church.

I am no longer United Methodist... much to my Mother's dislike... but there are just too many things I disagree with them on (that would be another discussion). I attended a nondenominational church for the past 11 years, but then this past year we moved... we tried a Messianic church for a while, but the drive is just to long... so now we are at an Assemblies of God. We haven't really found a perfect fit here... it's hard to find a church that is Charismatic and Calvinist :lol.

Fiskare
16th October 2003, 11:04 AM
IWe haven't really found a perfect fit here... it's hard to find a church that is Charismatic and Calvinist :lol.
Well, they're not exactly compatible theologies, are they? :)

Knight
16th October 2003, 11:10 AM
I think I would avoid the Free Methodist based on what has been said. There is no need to add more rules and regulations to the Christian life.

Personally, I'm not a fan of the Methodist church. That's mostly due to preference. However, I'm sure there are good Bible-teaching Methodist churches out there. I just haven't seen one.

My parents attend a Methodist church. I always walk away wondering what the pastor was talking about.

Plan 9
16th October 2003, 11:17 AM
I grew up United Methodist and my Mom is now a United Methodist minister... but I really have no idea. The only thing I know is that once there was a Northern Methodist church and a Southern Methodist church... this being during the Civil War... after the war the Northern and Southern Methodist churches decided to combine... thus was born the United Methodist church.
erm...yes, half the MEC did secede and afterward they got back together, but the United Methodist Chuch was born in the 1960s when the MEC merged with the Evangelical United Brethren.

I've been told that the UMC has been making overtures to the AME and the CME for a long time. They, of course, split off when the MEC South was born; let's talk insulting, shall we?


so now we are at an Assemblies of God. We haven't really found a perfect fit here... it's hard to find a church that is Charismatic and Calvinist :lol.
I'm really starting to feel for you now: the AG was started mostly by Baptists and Methodists and their doctrine is a triumph of compromise, in my not-so-humble opinion. But, there you are, still in a church which has some Methodism going! ;)

Tell me what aspect of Calvinism you would like to see in a Charismatic church? Who knows? I may have run across one somewhere. LOL

Plan 9
16th October 2003, 11:24 AM
I think I would avoid the Free Methodist based on what has been said. There is no need to add more rules and regulations to the Christian life.

Personally, I'm not a fan of the Methodist church. That's mostly due to preference. However, I'm sure there are good Bible-teaching Methodist churches out there. I just haven't seen one.

My parents attend a Methodist church. I always walk away wondering what the pastor was talking about.
If by "Bible-teaching", you mean conservative, then, yes; there are lots and I belong to one. A service at my church would knock your socks off. LOL

I've certainly attended a few like the one you've described though. they always make me wish my mommy was there to pull a pencil and a piece of paper out of her purse and tell me to draw something neat instead of wriggling round in the pew. :)

Knight
16th October 2003, 11:28 AM
If by "Bible-teaching", you mean conservative, then, yes; there are lots and I belong to one. A service at my church would knock your socks off. LOL
Compared to what I've seen of Methodism so far, I don't doubt it.

I've certainly attended a few like the one you've described though. they always make me wish my mommy was there to pull a pencil and a piece of paper out of her purse and tell me to draw something neat instead of wriggling round in the pew. :)

That's exactly the feeling I get. At least their new pastor is better. The last one really drove me nuts. The current one is just dull. (of course, I've only heard one of his sermons so I can't be too hard on him)

OnederWoman
16th October 2003, 11:39 AM
I'm really starting to feel for you now: the AG was started mostly by Baptists and Methodists and their doctrine is a triumph of compromise, in my not-so-humble opinion. But, there you are, still in a church which has some Methodism going! ;)

Tell me what aspect of Calvinism you would like to see in a Charismatic church? Who knows? I may have run across one somewhere. LOL
ya, I know... my Mom loves to remind me of the relation... of course A of G isn't ceasationist like the UMC. :)

We'd go to a more reformed type of church, but they tend to be so dry... being that the vast majority are ceasationist (don't believe the spiritual gifts are for today).

What part of Calvinism? The part where God is sovereign. ;) I was pointed towards the young denomination 'Sovereign Grace', which seem to be along the lines of what we would like.... but there aren't any close to us. I've heard there are some Presbytarian churches that come close, but they believe in infant baptism... a pet peeve of my hubbies.

Plan 9
16th October 2003, 11:43 AM
Compared to what I've seen of Methodism so far, I don't doubt it.
Actually, I wasn't comparing the experience with other Methodist churches. for instance, if you're happen to be AG, you wouldn't be disappointed. :)

That's exactly the feeling I get. At least their new pastor is better. The last one really drove me nuts. The current one is just dull. (of course, I've only heard one of his sermons so I can't be too hard on him)
UH OH! this one's dull and that's an improvement?? In that my mommy would have brought the cool colored pencils and secretly wished to stop looking at the Pastor and trying to listen and start drawing along with you ;)
"What a nice horsey, honey. I like that one. Let's draw a doggie next."

In many UMC churches (although this isn't true of mine), the choice of Pastor can make all the difference. UMC congregants should always make sure they have the best possible Pastor-Parish Relations Commitee, since they do the hiring and everything else that will affect him or her.

Knight
16th October 2003, 11:53 AM
The last one was just too wishy-washy for my taste. He waffled on too many issues. Call me crazy but I think a pastor should stand on firm convictions.

Like I said, I can't really judge their current pastor as I've only heard him once. The one message I heard was dull, IMO.

From what I can tell they don't get to choose the pastor. The district assigns a new one every few years.

I have never been to an AOG church. I might next year as the wife and I have been thinking of attending some area churches just to see how they do things. We're not shopping as we're perfectly happy with our church home but we're curious how the other churches in our area are spreading the Gospel.

wvmtnkid
17th October 2003, 08:53 AM
The MEC minister who started the Free Methodist Church wished to add "four freedoms" to the discipline, but, after saying that I could explain, I found to my horror that I could only remember one. :blush:

I feel certain that you're correct and that one "free" constitutes a temperance pledge. Another of the "frees" is "freedom from fraternal organizations".
We have two of the four and there were some other differences at the time the split occured, in addition to the "four frees".

I haven't yet had time to look up the specifics, but I'll do that shortly and get back to you.

In the meantime, I'll leave you with a quip a Free Methodist made to me.

"Well, the Free Methodist Church isn't really free,



but it is relatively inexpensive."
Thanks, Plan 9. I thought it was something along those lines. I was also told the differences were really minute. So far, it appears, I could be a Free Methodist! :)

Cute joke at the end. Relatively inexpensive!! :D

wvmtnkid
17th October 2003, 09:01 AM
The last one was just too wishy-washy for my taste. He waffled on too many issues. Call me crazy but I think a pastor should stand on firm convictions.

Like I said, I can't really judge their current pastor as I've only heard him once. The one message I heard was dull, IMO.

From what I can tell they don't get to choose the pastor. The district assigns a new one every few years.

I have never been to an AOG church. I might next year as the wife and I have been thinking of attending some area churches just to see how they do things. We're not shopping as we're perfectly happy with our church home but we're curious how the other churches in our area are spreading the Gospel.
Very true Knight, the pastor does help liven up a congregation. The way it works in our conference is that the Annual Conference (which is generally statewide) assigns the pastors to the churches, at least that is my recollection. Methodists change pastors every so many years. Typically 5, though some go longer, some go shorter. Now the church can vote to have the pastor removed, but that's a drawn out process, from what I hear. The church I attend has never voted a pastor out. Our Pastor Parish Relations committee works mainly with the hiring and firing of the church staff and does reviews of the pastor. We normally don't get much say in receiving a new minister, that is the decision of the Conference.

Knight
17th October 2003, 11:17 AM
Very true Knight, the pastor does help liven up a congregation. The way it works in our conference is that the Annual Conference (which is generally statewide) assigns the pastors to the churches, at least that is my recollection. Methodists change pastors every so many years. Typically 5, though some go longer, some go shorter. Now the church can vote to have the pastor removed, but that's a drawn out process, from what I hear. The church I attend has never voted a pastor out. Our Pastor Parish Relations committee works mainly with the hiring and firing of the church staff and does reviews of the pastor. We normally don't get much say in receiving a new minister, that is the decision of the Conference.
Personally, I think the church body (or committee in this case) should get some say as to the pastor assigned to them. That's strictly my opinion.

Contarini
18th October 2003, 02:05 PM
The Free Methodists were started just before the Civil War, I believe. They were staunchly anti-slavery, opposed to the practice of renting pews (which meant that the wealthy and influential members of the community had an exclusive right to much of the seating in the church), more evangelical and "holiness" in their outlook than other Methodists, and also more open to women's ministry.

Edwin

Tinker Grey
18th October 2003, 05:22 PM
Contarini has it right.

I went to a FM church for about 6 years between 85 & 91.

I would agree that they are more evangelical as Contarini says.

FM & UM agree on alcohol. To the best of my knowledge, FM adds nothing to UM.

They are close enough to Nazarenes that the two have been tossing the idea around of uniting for years.

Tinker

paco
19th October 2003, 07:43 PM
Free Methodists are "Free" because of two things. As a church they didn't feel that other Methodists condemned slavery enough. Also they believe that people shouldn't be charged for a seat in a pew. These things don't apply anymore but these things happen.

rookie
20th October 2003, 10:51 AM
Yes, the conference decides who the pastor is. And the pastor can make all the difference in the world. Right now at our UMC, we love our pastor. You would love his sermons. When the time comes for him and his family to leave, I just know I'm gonna cry.

wvmtnkid
21st October 2003, 03:12 PM
Hmmm, this is interesting. Thanks for the info on the differences.

I guess I am so used to the Conference assigning pastors I really don't think much about chosing my own pastor. It's all I have ever known. I know that there is certain criteria that you have to have to be ordained in the Conference, so I accept that the pastor I am getting is truly called by the Lord and that the Conference has consulted Him in making their decision on where to place the pastors. I don't think it is done willy nilly. I know that I don't really like that they leave so regularly sometimes, but I do to an extent understand the reasoning behind it. I suppose it is all in what you are used to.

rookie
22nd October 2003, 09:23 AM
Having grown up Catholic and then attending Baptist churches for a bit, after I first joined UMC, it was strange to me when I learned the pastors would be moved. I can't say that I'm used to it yet, but I'll live with it.

rookie

PHUMCgirl
30th October 2003, 01:23 AM
The Free Methodists were started just before the Civil War, I believe. They were staunchly anti-slavery, opposed to the practice of renting pews (which meant that the wealthy and influential members of the community had an exclusive right to much of the seating in the church), more evangelical and "holiness" in their outlook than other Methodists, and also more open to women's ministry.

Edwin
I agree, my UMC history class I just attended says that the Free Methodist Church was started in 1860 by B.T. Roberts, broke off from the Methodist Episcopal Church due to slavery.