PDA

View Full Version : The Eucharist


Secundulus
31st July 2007, 06:46 PM
Below, to initiate discussion on the Eucharist, is the conclusion of a paper I just finished for one of my classes. Its purpose was connect the symbolism of the early Church Eucharist with the Jewish Temple traditions. What does the Eucharist mean to you?


The early Christian understanding of the Eucharistic liturgy may clearly find its antecedents in the Old Testament and in specific Temple ceremonies. In the same manner that the Jews performed the thank offering in the temple, the earliest Christians celebrated the Eucharist in a spirit of thanksgiving to God. They offered a sacrifice of their firstfruits to God in thanksgiving and called on him to remember Christ’s covenant made at Calvary.

As the Jews ate their thank offering sacrifice, the Christians also ate theirs. However, the Christian liturgy assigned an entirely new meaning to the sacrificial elements. Nevertheless, while it was a new meaning in connection with a thank offering its origin was extremely old, reaching back to the foundation of the Temple tradition with Moses. During the liturgy, the bread and wine were transformed from being a simple thank offering by the people to a symbol of Christ himself. Mirroring its Jewish roots, the bread reflected the shewbread and symbolized the presence of God with his covenant people. The wine reflected the sacrifice of Moses at Sinai and became symbolic of God’s covenant through Christ.

Understood in this manner, the Eucharistic liturgy takes on a rich meaning to the participant. It is not simply a ritual meal where one remembers Christ's life and death. Neither is it a representation of Christ’s sacrifice that one passively watches. Rather, it is a sacrifice of thanksgiving in the present where everyone actively participates. However, its full meaning goes beyond this. While the people present their offering of thanksgiving to God, he gives back to them as food, concrete symbols to indicate that he is present with them and forever remembers the Covenant that Christ made with his Church.

PaladinGirl
31st July 2007, 08:45 PM
The Eucharist means a ton to me. It is a very important part of my life. However, I do not ever receive the Eucharist anymore because I am not a practicing Catholic. I cannot in full conscience fully participate in a religion with which I do not fully agree.

GratiaCorpusChristi
31st July 2007, 09:33 PM
I have held that the argument-from-the-temple is the best argument for the real presence of our Lord in the sacrament...

Take even a brief look at those key Pauline texsts on Holy Communion 1 Corinthians 10 and 11. In ten, it compares the Eucharist to the participation with idols found in eating foods sacrificed at their temples. More importantly in eleven, Paul states that those who have approached the Eucharist without repentence have fallen ill or died- just as those who approached the holy of holies inappropriately.

Indeed, throughout the gospel narratives, our Lord seems to set up his table-fellowship meals as alternatives to the temple cultus. The shekhinah glory, the real presence of God, now incarnate hypostatically in Jesus Christ, is the center of this meal of remembrance, anamnesis. And just as the Jews of who celebrated Passover believed that they themselves were led out of Egypt through the reading of the biblical narrative and the partaking of the meal, so too are we brought online on our pilgrimage toward Christ Pankrator and his kingdom as we read the holy gospel and the words of the institution and partake of the bread and wine, his body and blood.

WarriorAngel
31st July 2007, 10:08 PM
Most interesting aspect is Christ is all.
His Covenant is all the covenants.

At the altar it was the sacrifice of an animal oblations for their sins. [*note it would ever be fully acceptable]
At Passover it was the blood of the unblemished lamb.
Melchizidek was priest of God who offered wine and bread...

This shows how HE Himself the perfect sacrifice is present at the altar in the Bread made Body and the Wine made Blood.

He is the fulfilment of every covenant God gave to man.
Mystery...indeed.

:crossrc:

GratiaCorpusChristi
31st July 2007, 10:36 PM
Most interesting aspect is Christ is all.
His Covenant is all the covenants.

At the altar it was the sacrifice of an animal oblations for their sins. [*note it would ever be fully acceptable]
At Passover it was the blood of the unblemished lamb.
Melchizidek was priest of God who offered wine and bread...

This shows how HE Himself the perfect sacrifice is present at the altar in the Bread made Body and the Wine made Blood.

He is the fulfilment of every covenant God gave to man.
Mystery...indeed.

:crossrc:
Yes.

Christ, the Second Adam, is our Sabbath rest which brings the future New Creation into the present.

Christ, the captain of the New Ark, the Church, guides us on our pilgramage through the waters of this world toward the renewal of all creation.

Christ, the Seed of Abraham, chooses us to be his children by circumcising our hearts and sends us out to be lights to the gentiles.

Christ, Superior to Moses, brings the gospel of his resurrection and lordship to us by leading out of spirit exile into the land flowing with milk and honey.

Christ, the Son of David, clothes us in his glory as we worship him, the temple made without hands.

All these things are accomplished by Christ in the Eucharist as his sacrifice becomes present on our altars and we are offered up as oblations before the Lord.

Fiercely eschatological, fiercely Christocentric, fiercely covenantal, fiercely liturgical.