Which is the best Bible version?

[nvrbnunloved]

I use the NLT, as it makes the Bible come alive for me. If I`m not using that, I tend to go for the NIV.

[prayfordivinemercy]

I like the NAB, but l also like the JKV.

[Tanyalita]

KJV. :)

[chari.chari]

I prefer the NIV.

[chari.chari]

I don't think it matters that much. I mean, they all tell the same story.

[ZACTAK]

I prefer NIV

[progressivegal]

The more I read NIV, the less accurate I feel it is. I'm considering getting an amplified bible soon.

[C.A.B.L]

progressivegal,

I highly encourage you to get an Amplified Bible, it's a great resource.

[twyrch]

I have used the KJV and the NIV, but now I use the Amplified Bible. I love the way it breaks down the words into the original Hebrew and Greek words, allowing you to have your own interpretation of the Bible

[Mal2]

if its all gods word, then why do there need to be umpteen differetn versions of the same thing?

[Bledsoe2]

I think NIV is the best.

Bledsoe2
Please Reply

[California Dreamin']

I live NIV... I go to a Baptist university and we use NIV in class too.

[Colabomb]

progressivegal,

I highly encourage you to get an Amplified Bible, it's a great resource.
Just as long as you realize that their throw ins are not Scripture and subject to being faulty.

[Revelation 19:6]

New Jerusalem & NJKV

[SemStudent08]

I sort of had to vote for the RSV because the NRSV isn't an option. Here at seminary I am taking Greek from a professor who was on one of the translation committees for the NRSV. Consequently, I prefer the NRSV because I know the depth of his knowledge of Greek and am certain that the committees made up of he and his peers were both true to the Literal meaning of the Greek and put a great deal of effort into discovering the thought behind it as well.

[ChrisWins]

I live NIV... I go to a Baptist university and we use NIV in class too.

What does the NIV say about fasting in Mark 9:29 in the NIV?

What? It doesn't mention fasting? Hmmm... which is missing words, the NIV or the King James????

[Raithlin]

I voted NKJV, but I actually like using my parallel bible, with NKJV, NIV, NASB and NLT alongside each other. Using that along with the Amplified Bible and various commentaries where required make for a very good idea what God is trying to say to you at that point in time. It also rules out the possibility that your preferred version may be faulty (ALA NIV comment above).

[Woody]

Well i dont really know which the BEST one is...
But i voted for NIV cos its what i've got.....:thumbsup:

[GoldenStorm]

I say KJV b/c it's the closest to the original.

[Scholar in training]

What does the NIV say about fasting in Mark 9:29 in the NIV?

What? It doesn't mention fasting? Hmmm... which is missing words, the NIV or the King James????
The NIV doesn't leave it out. It has a note that says, "Some manuscripts prayer and fasting." Different manuscripts have different records of this verse, and the NIV includes both.

[ChikovGrace]

:wave: I would have to say the NIV because when it was translated they went back to the original languages and it was translated word for word and thought for thought. Let me explain, when most of the translations were being made the original text was looked at for either its word for word meaning (how it would be translated best into english) or in the thought for thought method (meaning the entire statement was looked at instead of just the words themself.) In the NIV translation they did both in looking at the word for word meaning and the thought for thought. Taking both and translating them into one Bible.

[paulnoel]

The best bible is the one that can relate God's word to you !

[underOATH!]

New Living Translation.

[AngylBelle]

I use various translations for various reasons because some are more suitable in certain situations. NIV is the one I am most familiar with, but being a religious studies major I have become more familiar with KJV, NRSV, NASB and the NIB. All are interesting comparisons and I think that the Lord leads you to the "points" He wants to get across in every version. Each translation is valuable because of the various minds that read them.

[baller_4_jc]

NIV

baller_4_jc

[WarriorAngel]

The best translation for me is the English worded version...;) LOL

But aside from being able to understand it..hehe, I use the NCE.
New Catholic Edition. :)

[GEO4CHRIST]

I prefer the King James version because it keeps me alert

[reformedfan]

I think the one you like reading is the best for you, but in terms of accuracy, probably KJV or ESV

[keeper]

i would think that a translation that would be as close to the original text would
be that translation that came from those that spoke the language. the vatican,
from what i can determine, rescinded their imprimature on one or more biblical
translations because their translations so departed from the original text so as
to alter the meaning to something other that what it was.
since it was not listed in the original list, one would be unable to vote for the
douay-rheims which was translated from the original latin vulgate.
have a goodyear. keeper.

[pentecostalgirl0414]

I voted for KJV because that was the bible that I was raised with. That is all I read, that is what we use at church. I like it, but that is just me.

[brinny]

KJV...it's melodic, poetic, beautiful.

[woman.at.the.well]

I voted for NIV because it is the version I have spent the most time in, and was able to understand best!

[michaeln]

I would have voted for the ESV (English Standard Version) but they didn't have that option. Before that I read the NKJV so that is what I picked for the pole.

[halifaxhoney]

I've used NKJV all my life. I'm not sure I have any that aren't.

[angelfizz]

yeh i like NIV as well but i also really like them for their NIV study bibles .. they're really easy to understand and the more you understand the more you can evangelise! so yeh . :D

[beetlequeendiva]

I don't think there is a "best" translation - they all have good points and they all have bad points. I prefer the NASB simply because it was the first translation I had and I'm used to it!!! I do not like NIV because I think it has more bad points that good in the translation

[Doreen]

at the moment I'm using the new living translation cause it's easy to read and understand^_^

[ChrisWins]

The NIV was translated using false texts. Why would ANYONE read a perverted version of the Bible that is based on texts with faulty doctrine? Why do people choose to read a book filled with errors, a book that simple is NOT God's Word but it is the word of man. Why? Please research this for yourselves. This is not just for the NIV but also the New American Standard and other version, also.

So many versions add and subtract from God's Word. Do you know - that is sin.

[ChrisWins]

I would have to say the NIV because when it was translated they went back to the original languages and it was translated word for word and thought for thought. Let me explain, when most of the translations were being made the original text was looked at for either its word for word meaning (how it would be translated best into english) or in the thought for thought method (meaning the entire statement was looked at instead of just the words themself.) In the NIV translation they did both in looking at the word for word meaning and the thought for thought. Taking both and translating them into one Bible.

This is simply not true, not all of it. Yes, they went back to original languages BUT the NIV is based on texts that were changed to suit lifestyles that were not the lifestyle according to God's Word in the texts that were ACCEPTED by the early church. The people who changed the texts, what they did was say things like, "This part here, it doesn't apply since Jesus was not that type of man. This part here, we don't like that, let's erase it." Meanwhile, the true texts remained unchanged. Those texts remained the Word of God and those were used to make the KJV. There are over 5,210 manuscripts that have been copied through the generations that MATCH the manuscripts used to make the KJV. The number of manuscripts that match the texts used to make the NIV, etc: only 45. Over 5,000 compared to not even 50. Why so few? Because the smaller number were ignored by the church because they were false and did not match the true documents.

But the falsified/changed texts were used for these newer versions of the Bible. The men who changed the texts that were used for the NIV and NASB, they did NOT believe Christ was on earth for the reasons He was. The changed texts have 2,800+ words MISSING. So, when translated, the texts do not translate to what is in the KJV. This means in the NASB there are 4,000+ changes to God's Word and in the NIV there are 6,600+ changes in God's Word compared to the KJV. Within these changes there are over 350 doctrinal errors in the New Testament.

The KJV version is superior in every way. Other newer versions are the changed Word of God. Changing the Word of God is sin.

Please research this for yourselves. There is a world of info out there. I'm not an expert but if you have any questions, just ask me and I can help point you in some good directions where you can go to discover the truth for yourself :)

God Bless!

[Scholar in training]

BUT the NIV is based on texts that were changed to suit lifestyles that were not the lifestyle according to God's Word in the texts that were ACCEPTED by the early church.
The NIV isn't the absolute best version out there, but it IS very helpful. They've exposed things like the added version of 1 John 5:7 (the one that talks about the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit) but they include it anyway - and warn you about it in the footnotes - so you can get the fullest picture of what they're talking about.

They noted that Mark 16:9-20 is probably a later addition as well. The writing style is different from the rest of Mark, and the part that says Jesus rebuked the disciples for not immediately believing He was resurrected is not found in any of the other gospels. Furthermore, many of the reliable early manuscripts and ancient manuscripts do not have Mark 16:9-20.

[smnthncry]

i think that the king james in the best for somethings and the new international is best for other things

[Quantum_Man]

I voted for NIV.

[maylu_roll]

NKJV is the best but it depends on wat u can read. The modern day version, extreme teen bible, is good if u have trouble with all the old talk.

[svdbygrace]

New Revised Standard Version! (NRSV) :)

[YC Bearzie]

Since mine is not up there I voted NIV. I have the NCV(new century version)-but i really think it depends on the person-so saying it is "the best" is not what others may think...

[Richard]

I think the NIV version is the best because it has the lowest grade level for understandability. My whole church uses it :P

[Ynde]

I own NIV, NASB, NKJV, and ESV. I've also read the KJV a lot, and am familiar with the NLT, the Message, and other translations because I work at a Christian bookstore. As has already been stated several times, which is the best translation depends somewhat upon who will be reading it. I like more literal, word-for-word translations better, even if they're sometimes harder to understand, but I have a few friends who don't read well, and something they will actually pick up, read, and understand is a lot better than something more "accurate" that will only sit on the shelf.

[LisaWolf]

I personally prefer the King James Version, is what I grew up with.

[*-The-Elusive-Chicken-*]

I always liked the NIV... It's simple and you don't need to be able to understand old english to understand IT... Even though I do understand old english...

[Morning Dove]

I voted for the NASB because I've used one for years, and it is my favorite. I believe it to be the most accurate. It also doesn't have a heavy copyright on it (it has one, but a liberal one) like the new versions do.

[I'ddie4him]

I voted the NIV, But, I also like my good old worn out KJV.

[Colabomb]

I voted for the NASB because I've used one for years, and it is my favorite. I believe it to be the most accurate. It also doesn't have a heavy copyright on it (it has one, but a liberal one) like the new versions do.
One of the most accurate I have read.

[Paleoconservatarian]

I'm tied between NIV and NASB, but I use NIV in church readings more often, so I picked that one.

[no_worries]

How about the original Hebrew and Greek? If only I could read them :scratch:

[Paleoconservatarian]

How about the original Hebrew and Greek? If only I could read them :scratch:

Amen to that. That's definitely something I want to learn before it's too late.

[eden2760]

I like them all. Ultimately the Holy Spirit will help you interpret what your reading and get the message across despite what version you're reading. But I favor my KJV/Amplified parallel bible. So good! :)

[Hisbygrace]

I voted NIV, but I would say the one that gives you a better understanding of Gods word.

[SemStudent08]

How about the original Hebrew and Greek? If only I could read them :scratch:

Amen to that. That's definitely something I want to learn before it's too late.

I'd definitely recommend it! You just get so much more out of the text using the Greek and Hebrew. One of my favorite examples being Christ on the Cross saying "It is finished". Looking at the Greek involved, the term "finished" carries heavy connotations of "accomplished." Which just carries a ton of theological meaning behind it. Rather than a statement that Christ's life is over, it is a statement that Christ's redemptive purpose is accomplished. Definite tie-back to the Garden prayer, "Not my will, but yours..." and other statements of sacrifice Christ makes in the Gospels. Of course, reading the Greek and Hebrew can also present some challenging spots. But getting into that may spark a debate, and this isn't the place for that.

[Linda109]

Just a question..I am trying to get back into reading the bible. I have a KJV. It sounds like a NIV might be an easier version to understand. Any opinions?

[C.A.B.L]

Hey Linda,

It's good that your not only looking to read the bible, but understand it as well. It's very important that you understand what the Bible says. I would recommend either the NIV or the NASB. There is a Bible that I have that is really great for studying and reading. It's a Zondervan Comparative Study Bible. It has KJV NIV NASB and the Amplified. It's really great and I highly recommend it.

God Bless
Matt

[AvgJoe]

The NLT is awesome. Easy to read & understand.

[Maxster211]

NIV because its the easyest version I have ever read

[Jerrysch]

Surely then you can't take the Bible by it's word. A lot of the Bible is said to be metaphorical, metaphores' meanings can easily be changed by altering one word. And the languages in the bible have been dead for so long that there are bound to be errors in translation. The evolution of the English language alone means that words have changed meanings. These small differences can mean that different Bibles give different meanings so surely you can't say the Bible is perfect, else they would all be the same.

Hi Liam,

Indeed there are many metaphores in the Bible, there are many different forms of figures of speach in it, one might ask why, well they are used becasue that is the way we talk. They provide imagry which allows the author to make a point vivid in the mind of his reader. The whole story regarding Jesus being the good shepherd is a example of this. The imagry makes the teaching more memorable. The problem comes in when a figure of speach is either not recognized or the meaning is not properly determined.

The deadness of a language actually helps to preserve its meaning! When a language is considered "dead" it is designated as such because no one uses it in conversation. This means that the meanings of the words are fixed and from that point do not change! English being a living language changes all the time. The word "cool" will demonstrate this. When I was a lad "cool" meant to be clever. In my father's day "cool" meant something else, while to you it might have some other meaning. That is because the meaning changes with time. That is why there are so many different translations of the Bible. When I becase a Christian I got my NASB and it reflected the English language which I was familiar with. Time have changed and so has language, so the translators are seeking to keep up by offering a translation in the modern language of the day.

Actually the Hebrew and Greek texts upon which the translations are based have not changed their meaning and within all of them (and there are many) there is only about a 2% difference between any of them. And the differences in all the texts do not affect any Bible doctrine at all.

The translations will have some sort of errors in them, the translations were done by men and men are fallable, but the original text were given by inspiration of God and they are given without error. This is of course called inspiration and believe me this was as great a miricle as the incarnation of Jesus Christ was. :thumbsup: We can discuss this more if you like

[Maxster211]

My point is, it has better english grammer and is easier to understand the meaning of the words, which will help when you understand its parables.

[sherlockmcbride]

I don't really know if there's a best Bible version, but I put NIV because I think it is easy to understand. But KJV and NKJV are also good.

[anonymous_user]

I've been reading the new "Holman Christian Standard Bible" because the font size and layout make it very easy to read. They also have a full size NT that's nice.

[MQTA]

The translations will have some sort of errors in them, the translations were done by men and men are fallable, but the original text were given by inspiration of God and they are given without error. This is of course called inspiration and believe me this was as great a miricle as the incarnation of Jesus Christ was. :thumbsup: We can discuss this more if you like

I've heard that time and time again. I guess one has to have faith in that, too. Lotta controversey nowadays over that little Without Error clause.

[Jerrysch]

I've heard that time and time again. I guess one has to have faith in that, too. Lotta controversey nowadays over that little Without Error clause.

Indeed there is much faith require in all thing pertaining to God and His ways, You will remember the father of faith, Abraham was counted righteous because of his faith!

[Maxster211]

Yes, he was. I do believe that faith is needed, but I think that it may change for some people who read the bible to choose which is better. I like the NIV because it is clear and easy to fallow english wise. I used to like the KJV because it had the THY insted of YOU and so on. I guess it changes on who is reading it.

[Fero]

Yes, he was. I do believe that faith is needed, but I think that it may change for some people who read the bible to choose which is better. I like the NIV because it is clear and easy to fallow english wise. I used to like the KJV because it had the THY insted of YOU and so on. I guess it changes on who is reading it.

I like the King James 21st Century because I like the tone of the Elizabethan English but enjoy the retranslation of the more obscure English. For more of why I like this translation visit the website for the King James 21st Century (which I can't give you the link to because of some strange rule that I don't understand). I agree with the reviews most hardily! But of course which book you use is a personal preference. I used to use contemporary English translations (NASB & NKJV) when I first began to study the Bible and they helped a lot. I don't think I would have gotten into reading the Bible on a regular bases without them! What matters most of all, I will continue to reiterate, is faith in the death and resurrection of Our Lord, Jesus Christ, for the forgiveness of sin and salvation. John 17:8

8For I have given unto them the Words which Thou gavest Me; and they have received them and have known surely that I came out from Thee, and they have believed that Thou didst send Me.

[God Child]

The original manuscripts of coarse! But for english translation, since i live in america now and i like verbatim translation i use NASB often.

[Im-revived]

I would say KJVersion as it has the actual words of Christ in red! Although the NIV is easier to read its more of a translation. Good question though!

Jane

[Fero]

I would say KJVersion as it has the actual words of Christ in red! Although the NIV is easier to read its more of a translation. Good question though!

Jane

Unless you are reading the original Greek, Hebrew or Aramaic, they are all translations! But I know what you mean. LOL:groupray:

[IcarusFell]

I am an English Lit geek, so I like to use the KJV. NLT seems too week to me, but NIV is really good.

[otter272]

The best type of Bible version for a person, is the one that is read.



I would have to agree with you here. I don't think any one particular translation is the best.
It really depends on what you are looking for.
If you are looking for a literal translation, I would personally have to say that the New American Standard is the best.
If you are looking for a dynamic translation, in other words, a translation that is not a literal word for word, but is essentially a literal idea for idea translation, than, again personally, I would choose the New Living Translation. I like this one for a dynamic translation because the wording is very simple to understand.

However, if I am actually sitting down, doing a hard core Bible study, I usually have 2-3 Bibles in front of me. Most of the time, I'll have the NASB, the New Living and the NIV Study Bible with me for that.

[IcarusFell]

Anyone ever hear of Youngs Literal Translation?

[Paleoconservatarian]

Anyone ever hear of Youngs Literal Translation?

Yes, and I've read from it, but I'm not really familiar with it.

[chris_J_N]

there are no superier translations of the bible. diffrent translations were written for diffrent purposes.

[SeenAndUnseen]

I selected the KJV, but I also have a great and growing respect for the NIV.

[MQTA]

anyone ever hear of the TEB?

http://www.centuryone.org/translation.html


The Original Bible Project (OBP) is a decade-long effort (1994-2004) to produce an entirely new and independent English translation of both the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament known as the Transparent English Bible (TEB). Despite the plethora of recent high quality scholarly Bible translations on the market, serving the widest range of tastes and interests, the TEB is distinctively and refreshingly different in that it allows the English reader to “peer through” to the original Hebrew and Greek texts.1 (http://www.centuryone.org/translation.html#1) Its unique concept, and special features, will strongly appeal to a wide and diverse audience, including general readers, life-long Bible students, and professional academics.

The Concept



Translation Theory


There is an ancient Jewish adage regarding translating the Scriptures, “One who translates a verse literally is misrepresenting the text, but one who adds anything of his own is a blasphemer.” Modern translators of the Bible continue to echo, in more sophisticated debate, the dilemma of this ancient bit of wisdom. The literal method of translation seeks to convey an exact sense of the words and the structure of the original language, while the paraphrase, or “dynamic equivalent” method, purposely recasts the essential “thought” of the original into the natural idiom and flow of the second language. The problem is that an overly naïve literalism easily becomes nonsense, while “recasting thought” can end up obscuring or even altering the richness of the original text.

[mark53]

I actually use the NewRSV Bible. I like its translation, its readability. In my studies of Greek and Hebrew, I find it not too bad in accuracy. (however one defines that word "accuracy"!!!!!!

[blessedbythebest]

I believe the Word is the Word...However you decide 2 take it we are worshiping the same God as Christians!

[PlumTea]

I use nkjv and kjv, but I voted kjv..It's the prettiest soundin'.

[mycatspice]

Wow. I'm surprised at how many chose the KJV as their preferred Bible version. Before I was a Christian the KJV played a major role in turning me away from accepting Christ (personally). I still remember how excited I was when I was told by a Christian that Christ accepts me for who I am and then when I read some of the NIV I actually understood what I was reading. :) But alot of people think that it's the "most accurate" (Lol, so is the original manuscript in a foreign language I guess is if I follow that logic correctly). Personally, I don't like the wording used in KJV for the modern age because it creates the appearance that the Bible is out of date (which that version is in my opinion), but I can see where the Christians are coming from when they choose that one as a preference so I try to keep an open mind when I see my friends attempt to win others in vain when they quote the KJV to teenagers. I like The Message or the NCV when I read and I like quoting the NIV. :thumbsup:

[Princess Tinese]

I say the NIV because it breaks the meaning down a little futher and give you more understanding of what the passage may be saying

[~Mrs. A2J~]

The first Bible I got was the NIV Study Bible - I wanted one that was easy to understand. Well, I read it cover to cover last year and thought it was fine. But then I did some studying on the different Bible translations and came to the conclusion that the NIV has quite a few inaccuracies and that the KJV is the most accurate translation. So now I use a KJV/NKJV Parallel Bible and always try to read it in the KJV but if I need help I read it in the NKJV too for clarification.

[Scholar in training]

Wow. I'm surprised at how many choose the KJV. Before I was a Christian that was what turned me away from accepting Christ (personally). But alot of people think that it's the "most accurate" (Lol). So that's cool.
Could you explain this a little further, if you wouldn't mind? I'd be interested in hearing what you mean.

[mycatspice]

Could you explain this a little further, if you wouldn't mind? I'd be interested in hearing what you mean.

Sorry about that, I had like 3 mins to type that thought. :)

[Scholar in training]

Sorry about that, I had like 3 mins to type that thought. :)
Actually, I meant to ask why the KJV turned you off from becoming a Christian for a while. ;)

[ladybug01]

Douay-Rheims

[mycatspice]

Actually, I meant to ask why the KJV turned you off from becoming a Christian for a while. ;)

I updated the post. :) Do you want me to explain more? Or does that make sense?

[Scholar in training]

I updated the post. :) Do you want me to explain more? Or does that make sense?
Oh, sorry. I didn't see that you edited it.

Nope, I think I understand what you mean. Thanks for the explanation.

[ServantOrion]

I Like KJV, but I don't think it is the only way to God

[MQTA]

I like the SAB, it helps me put things into perspective

[mnphysicist]

I like the WEB as its Public Domain, is ported to the Palm OS, and as such is with me 24/7 with backlighting. http://www.ebible.org/

I also tend to like the NASV, and the NIV, but due to copyright restrictions, I only have them in book form.

I should add, the BEST bible is the one that is read.

Ron

[lnknprk2003]

NIV it's the one i use

[one way]

I don't think it matters really. As long as you like the version you are reading and understand it, it's alright. What you prefer could also have to do with the version you are most familiar with.

[one way]

I use NIV because I can understand it, and when I first started reading the Bible properly I used the NIV.

[paxi1334]

best version would certainly be the NRSV. NASB is good too though.

[Br0k3n]

Nlt

[watchman7]

Surely then you can't take the Bible by it's word. A lot of the Bible is said to be metaphorical, metaphores' meanings can easily be changed by altering one word. And the languages in the bible have been dead for so long that there are bound to be errors in translation. The evolution of the English language alone means that words have changed meanings. These small differences can mean that different Bibles give different meanings so surely you can't say the Bible is perfect, else they would all be the same.

So, what do you base your Christian faith upon if do not believe the Bible? I believe the Bible is without error as it was originally given to men under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Many translations may lose some of the original meaning.
What else exists to base your Christian faith upon?
The Holy Spirit reveals the truth to us as we read His Word.
Some translations like the King James version is 99.99% accurate. The other .01% concerns small details.
Many translations of today are sufficient.

[Justin761985]

I voted KJV.

God Bless,
Justin.

[Irate]

I love the king james version myself, it is very well translated and poetic for me, even while most I know use either NLT or NIV, both which don't hold the same power to me.

I especially like the extended use of 'beloved' within KJV while some of the newer, updated ones use more modern language. But to each their own.

[Scholar in training]

Some translations like the King James version is 99.99% accurate. The other .01% concerns small details.
Do you have a source for this statistic?

[~Nihilus~]

I love the king james version myself, it is very well translated and poetic for me, even while most I know use either NLT or NIV, both which don't hold the same power to me.

I especially like the extended use of 'beloved' within KJV while some of the newer, updated ones use more modern language. But to each their own.i prefer the NASB version; im not quite sure that the KJV is as accurate

[Im-revived]

The King James Version is the best as it has the proper words actually in red that were spoke by Jesus. It is also formatted in the original way of words at the time.

Im-revived:preach:

[JacqS]

I prefer NIV for reading, but we (as in hubby & I) have several versions NIV, KJV, Living, Revised Standard, 'The Message' that we refer to. I think, considering the possibility of errors in translation (inspired by God, but done by the hands of men after all!!) , changing nature of language, changing culture, etc. I always think its a good idea to look at what a few different versions say to get a better picture.

Yeah, be great if we all had original texts and could read ancient Hebrew/Greek, etc. and perfectly understood the culture of the period the things were written in, but we don't - and I think that's why the bible says the early christian church gathered together daily to discuss the scriptures (just like an ancient CF forum ;) ) and that's why I think that small group fellowships are at least as important, if not more so, than church services, because it provides us with different perspectives of the same reading, and helps us to remain open minded.

[Amish_angel]

It is my opinion that the King James Version is, by far, the best English translation of the Bible. It does not omit anything, and is the most accurate. I find it more spiritually fulfilling then the other translations as well.

[osensnolf]

The New King James Version is the difference between Old English and current day English while keeping the original context.

[ChristianPoet05]

I use the NIV version, although i could not say which one is the best, I've only read the NIV and some of the KJV. But I don't like the newest bibles that break down every sentence and word into very simple things. I like some complexity.

[jacko50]

i love the KJV because of the beautiful poetic flow that it has when you read it. for an easy read however the NIV is the best.
i also have a youth bible, which, to be honest, is an awful translation. it has lost so much meaning in some of the scriptures. i read Romans 8 out of the KJV which i fell in love with, after reading it in the youth translation i felt like i was reading a different chapter.

i voted KJV because its AWSOME

[ToxicBex]

NLT cuz it's really easy for a dumb person lyk me to understand

[MQTA]

What? Nobody likes The Message?

[ToxicBex]

I don't lyk the message because my one doesn't have bible verses next to the verses...so I get lost...I love NLT :D its my baby!

[ToxicBex]

*Notices that I already posted a reply to this topic, lyk before...sorry* *goes red*

[Silent*Tears]

I don't think that one Bible can really be BETTER than the other as long as they say the same things.But my dad (he is a Pastor in Marshfield) says that we should be careful of some versions though, because they can twist words around to a different meaning. But I think that the KJV or the NKJV are best.

[Interesting2me]

The KJV has been time tested, researched for errors probably more than any other book written by 'mans hands' and withstood every true test! The Dead Sea Scrolls are a classic example, as they read almost or exactly word for word as the original KJV written in the English language, without any loss of meaning(s), etc. some newer versions are ok or excellent [without too much human input that takes away from what God said, as opposed to what they think, all notes should be verified!], I have used several different versions, and always came back to my trusty original KJV. I also found Tyndales Living Bible to be an excellent choice for starters and at most any other time. :wave: God Bless.

[Interesting2me]

The KJV has been time tested, researched for errors probably more than any other book written by 'mans hands' and withstood every true test! The Dead Sea Scrolls are a classic example, as they read almost or exactly word for word as the original KJV written in the English language, without any loss of meaning(s), etc. some newer versions are ok or excellent [without too much human input that takes away from what God said, as opposed to what they think, all notes should be verified!], I have used several different versions, and always came back to my trusty original KJV. I also found Tyndales Living Bible to be an excellent choice for starters and at most any other time. :wave: God Bless. "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly unto all good works".

[king-priest]

I don't think that one Bible can really be BETTER than the other as long as they say the same things.But my dad (he is a Pastor in Marshfield) says that we should be careful of some versions though, because they can twist words around to a different meaning. But I think that the KJV or the NKJV are best.
I love the Scolfield study bible (KJV)cause he used verse by verse comparison and also an intense study in all doctrines in the bible-using orignial langauges.
I also use it in accordance with Strong's Concordance. It clears things up when I get blurred on a verse. And you can't use the Strong's with the new make it easier versions cause those words are not what was written from original languages but rewritten after the english language. For one thing, the Grk language is so precise that it does not have a thesaurus. So in attempts to make it easier, it in facts waters down the truth. Plus, I prefer to check any pastor by the Strong's and and found where they were taking literal where in the original language, a synonym was applied.
Oh yes, give me His concentrated truth.

[Yitzchak]

What? Nobody likes The Message?

I love "the message" bible.

[Yitzchak]

I believe in "levels" of inspiration. For example, a pastor may say that he hears from God in preparing his sermon and in performing his duties as pastor. I believe that this happens. But I also don't feel a sense of pressure concerning the pastor's perfection. I understand that God works through imperfect people. Another example is a good christian book or song. I believe that God annoints such things and to a certain "level' these things amy be inspired" at times. Romans says that even the creation itself testifies of the creator. There are "levels" of revelation and "inspiration". they all fit into their place in God's purposes.

At the head of all of these revelations is the scripture. Are the translations perfect? I don't believe that they are any more than many of the other vessels that God uses are perfect.

1 Corinthians 13:9-13

This scripture passage sums it up for me. When we get to heaven and see God face to face , then we shall know as we are known. But until then , we see through a glass darkly. A glimpse here and a glimpse there. Thanks to the greatness of our God and the greatness of His revelation to us, those glimpses are enough to change our lives for all eternity.

Even those who believe that the scriptures are perfect , word for word, still have to deal with the imperfection of how we interpret those scriptures. I don't say lightly that the bibles that we have are imperfect. They are an awesome revelation of God to us. It is not God's error , but rather the imperfection of the realm within which we live which causes us to see darkly through a glass. I am convinced that the bibles which we have are powerful to accomplish the task which they have been assigned. To bring God's message to us.

[lgintrnj]

with a strongs concordance you can bring the kjv back to the original manuscripts if you like a really deep study

[HisLilyWhitePrincess]

I like KJV and NKJV, because they tend to be the most acurately translated.

[Lizzi4Christ]

I prefer NASB because it's more word for word. I know three men who know Hebrew and Greek extremely well and they all recommend NASB. Also from personal study, NASB seems to be more word for word. But I think most are pretty good (except paraphrase. I hate paraphrase).

Just remember with trying to determine "the best" that you can't compare version with version. You need to go back to the original manuscripts, which is a debate in and of itself.

[BrokenMystery]

I'm not sure

[Richard]

I think it depends on reading level.

KJV is for the super readers.

NIV is for normal

[sixpounder5150]

all none kjvs are flawed. it was the first version to be translated into english (by king james the 1 of england 7 of scotland) and because of copyright laws it is the only english version. plus that much talked about niv took a whole verse out of the bible i cant remember exact but it was in acts. the reason why it is only real one is because the copyright makes all versions after kjv have to change certain amount of words more than the version before so the hiliness is destroyed for some ahole looking t make a quick buck off of christians who think its all in good cause like easier language or no more sexism

[progressivegal]

all none kjvs are flawed. it was the first version to be translated into english (by king james the 1 of england 7 of scotland) and because of copyright laws it is the only english version. plus that much talked about niv took a whole verse out of the bible i cant remember exact but it was in acts. the reason why it is only real one is because the copyright makes all versions after kjv have to change certain amount of words more than the version before so the hiliness is destroyed for some ahole looking t make a quick buck off of christians who think its all in good cause like easier language or no more sexism

Interesting, I've never ehard that before. Do you have a source?

[big1968dog]

New Living Translation

[AngCath]

no NRSV? well i put RSV in the mean time

[JulianaTheory]

I use several different translations. Some translations have scriptures that have been left out. I personally use the Contemporary English Version every day, then I use others for references. (KJV, NKJV, NLT)

[Stacey]

KJV or NIV. I also use the direct Greek translation bible (New Testament) sometimes.

[jul7246]

for me - KJV definitely. Cuz i remember the shock i had when i read a part of some strange simplified version of the Bible and realized that it didn't get the EXACT message across,as compared to the KJV. We have a good russian translation of the Bible - the synodal translation. =)

[ce58]

I said RSV. I'm not sure if that's the same as NRSV, but I like NRSV because that's what my parents got me for Christmas.

[Colabomb]

No, the NRSV is a newer translation.

[Bonhoffer]

King James is the best version for doctrine, but New International Version is the best for reading.

[JustPrayAnyways]

The bible I read is the New International Version. Haven't realy read any other versions yet to compare....

[QuantaCura]

Where's the Douay-Rheims?:scratch:

[Brooke4Jesus]

I voted NKJV and If i could I would have voted NIV as well. They are translations that I can understand the best

[californiadreamin]

amplified and NIV

[scooby7688]

What I use is NIV. I seem to understand it better so it works for me.


In Christ's Love, Scott

[chokmah]

When I was a Christian, I liked the NASB the most.

[Lynn73]

I vote KJV.

[Fly4Christ]

I would have to say that The Message is by far the best version I have ever read. I just like it's styles and it's easy-to-understand format.

EDIT: I just noticed that you didn't have that on your poll. cr4p. ;)

[Made2Soar]

If you have a poll that doesn't give you the right choice, seems like a poor poll. The best ones are in the original languages. If not, then looking at a number of different translations can also be helpful.

[artaxbombadil]

I usually read the NASB, so I chose that. I also like KJV and Amplified. The others I'm not very familiar with. Which one is best? I don't know.

[GEO4CHRIST]

Kjv

[ChessCastle]

Niv

[mark53]

If you have a poll that doesn't give you the right choice, seems like a poor poll. The best ones are in the original languages. If not, then looking at a number of different translations can also be helpful.

Spot on!!
I love looking at the Greek and working on my own translations and I am trying to teach myself Hebrew.

I also read mainly the NRSV, NIV and most others. I do not use the KJV as virtually noone speaks this language in everyday use, so it is not much use for me. As the KJV uses the 'majority' text against all the others it therefore uses the most common texts and therefore, sometimes, not the earliest ones. When the original KJV was written they didn't have many of the Greek manuscripts abvailable and so uses the Latin texts to fill in what they didn't have. There are a number of good books which go through the history of the KJV and it is very good and even inspirational.

[kerux]

Whichever version you will read.

[PastorJason]

...that the NRSV isn't a choice. Of course, I refuse to call any version the "best," they are, after all the work of imperfect humans and all fall short of the glory of God. ;)

[mark53]

...that the NRSV isn't a choice. Of course, I refuse to call any version the "best," they are, after all the work of imperfect humans and all fall short of the glory of God. ;)

True, very true! Even the Greek and Hebrew texts are copied centuries after the originals and there are many variations to these texts. Also one has to translate these words and sentences. Then there is no one exact English word for wvery Greek or Hebrew word.

[drewInMinneapolis]

I like the NIV. Specifically my NIV study bible. Has lots of great cross references, and is written more to today's English which makes ministry a much easier road.

[the_baby]

NIV is the easiest to read and understand.

[Unique]

I think the best Bible version is actually the original Greek and Hebrew. In translation, many layers of meaning have been lost. However, my favorite modern version is the NLT. I also like the Message.

[Athene]

I prefer an amplified bible which gives the historical background, details of the writers and also gives alternate translations.

I used to prefer NIV until I learned that some bad translational errors still remain in it, I lost confidence in it after that.

[mark53]

I used to prefer NIV until I learned that some bad translational errors still remain in it, I lost confidence in it after that.

There are bad translation errors in every one of them. Pick the ONE you like best and compare that to others. Even better still learn the Greek and the Hebrew.

[Doreen]

I'm using the new century version and I like it. it's easy to understand

[Happy to be His]

what is important is that you understand what the bible is teaching you....that is the bible for you.

[flyingangels]

i voted NIV

[xray01]

KJV- the original if the best. Although I do also use the NIV, comes a close second. Its more important that you have a Bible which you understand and use rather than one which sits on a shelf because you cant undestand it

[Oblivious]

I prefer the New Kings James Version.

[Andrelj]

I prefer NIV, but no matter what version of the bible, it all says the same thing. There isn't really a better one. It's all a matter of preference.

[Witness Of His Love]

I still enjoy reading the KJV

[1057]

Bible sales ranking in the U.S. and Canada:

1 New King James Version
2 New International Version
3 King James Version
4 New Living Translation
5 Holman Christian Standard Bible
6 New Century Version
7 The Message Eugene Peterson
8 Reina Valera 1960 (Spanish)
9 New American Standard Bible update
10 New International Readers Version

This list is based on actual sales in Christian retail stores in the United States and Canada during August, using STATS as the source for data collection. All rights reserved. Distribution and copyright ©2005 CBA and Evangelical Christian Publishers Association.

[godisgr8]

NIV, because what good is reading the Bible if you can't understand it.

[kleptobismol]

Niv

[beehoney]

This is an official Christian Forums poll. Just click and vote to view the results. :)

King James Version
New King James Version
21st Century King James Version
New International Version
New American Standard Bible
New Living Translation
Revised Standard Version
Good News Bible
Jerusalem Bible
Amplified Version
I grew up on the KJV but I acquired an NIV a few years ago. I like the way the language flows and some difficult passages are much clearer in the NIV. I know there has been a lot of controversy surrounding "missing" verses, but the NIV committee has been thorough in their explanation of these "omissions." I accept their explanation as I think it was an honest one.

[1057]

I grew up on the KJV but I acquired an NIV a few years ago. I like the way the language flows and some difficult passages are much clearer in the NIV. I know there has been a lot of controversy surrounding "missing" verses, but the NIV committee has been thorough in their explanation of these "omissions." I accept their explanation as I think it was an honest one.I agree. I like both versions, for different reasons. The NIV is a masterpiece of clear American english--it is never clumsy or pretentious or slangy. They had style consultants working with them while they were translating it, and it was field tested extensively on pastors and laymen, and folks at different educational levels. I bring up all this because the KJV gets most of the glory for style--it's peerless for literary quality, and it's more beautiful than the NIV--but there's something to be said for clarity. I like the way these translations complement each other.

[anawim]

It's a toss-up between Duoay-Rheims and the Revised Standard Version-Catholic Edition.

[mark53]

I grew up on the KJV but I acquired an NIV a few years ago. I like the way the language flows and some difficult passages are much clearer in the NIV. I know there has been a lot of controversy surrounding "missing" verses, but the NIV committee has been thorough in their explanation of these "omissions." I accept their explanation as I think it was an honest one.

The reason why there are "missing verses" in other than the KJV versions is: that the KJV uses what is called the "Majority Text". This means that the manuscripts of a particular word or verse is the most numerous than that must be the correct one. Whereas the other versions use the oldest known manuscript that they have.
To put this in another way (and this shows MY bias!) What I write here is to be then copied (manually) and sent around the world a number of times with all the copies coming back to me, The Majority version of these words and phrases would then be the correct one, NOT, what I have written! To me that is illogical. There are many, many version and varieties in the Greek manuscripts, let alone the Latin, Coptic and other early Church manuscripts of the first few centuries alone! :thumbsup: :D

[Rome]

Niv

[bill'swife]

Kjv

[GodsGrl2]

For reading purposes, I like the NLT

[day2day]

Kjv:)

[4square]

I like the NIV and use that at Church - however the NKJV is good too. I use 6 different translations and compare them to gain a greater understanding.

- Chris.

[Cooter]

King James

[D'Ann]

I voted for the RSV... but I've been told that the Douay-Rheims and the Jerusalem Bibles are good too... must check them out.

[CaptainMercy]

Not true, there are many metaphores in the bible and as such, a small change in wording can radically affect the meaning. As well as this there are known problems in translating documents, words and meanings can easily be mistranslated so how sentances could say the completely wrong thing, the fact that there are different versions shows that god isn't keeping the bible perfect.Don't blame God with mans ignorance! Remember that Satan from the beginning corrupted God's words to Adam and Eve! He is still in the business today. Many of the newer versions also show a sign of new age philosophy in their interpretation! Just because the KJV shows a masculinity in its translation doesn't make it a bad translation! What should govern the validity of a translation is it dealings with the blood of Christ, the deity of Christ and the account of the virgin birth. These are all pillars of our faith! Without the blood of Jesus there is no remission of sin! (see Hebrews 9:22). We cannot claim that Jesus is Lord without Him having the deity He is entitled to! Without the virgin birth there would be no spotless lamb for Jesus would have then been conceived in sin!:preach: :amen: :cool:

[cat has felt the light!]

I said the NIV its what works for me at the mo, but then I'm studyin Nrsv at college (theology as part of my course) so who knows it could change, fascianting to compare them!
so hey why choose one?!
kitten xx

[trashy]

I use the New Century Version a lot, but my fave is the Skeptic's Annotated Bible (http://skepticsannotatedbible.com)

[tryme]

Since the question is which is the best instead of which do you use I will say KJV.

I generally use NIV and new KJV

[godsgirl5048]

Niv....All my life...I think:scratch:

[crusader4peace]

i wouldn't like to say which is the best one. i follow the Good News version. it was my first bible given to me by my dad when i was young. since then its been my fav.

[kiwimac]

It bears repeating that the Best Bible version is the one you USE.

[AngCath]

we need a new list of choices

[firestar]

I like NKJV

[Cooter]

I've always read King James Version KJV

[Lindseysigns]

I really don't think there is a best or worst or any in between. it is whatever is easily read by the one that is reading it. I use different Bibles and compare scripture all the time.

[CountryLady]

KJV

[Ethos711]

I prefer NIV.
One of my teachers loves the Message, I don't like that version at all.

[lollipop686]

NIV because that's pretty much the only one that "speaks my language" (I can understand)

[Big Mouth Nana]

I like the KJV, but I also read the Amplified for clarification.

[gal4God]

Ncv

[SearchingintheNight]

None of the above

[mark53]

Some KJV information:-

In "The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language:Second edition" I would like to quote some stuff which might be interesting; pp64-65.
"The origins of the work are well-documented ... King James was presented with the "millenary Petition', in which 750 reformers from within the Church of England requested a new translation of the Bible. In a conference the following year, the King proposed a panel of university scholars who would carry out a preliminary translation, and thwen this would be submitted to the bishops for revision. The 54 translators were divided into six 'companies', each working on a seperate section of the Bible. ...
Translors were to use the Bishop's Bible where possible but were permitted to consult Tyndale and other earlier versions if necessary (and in fact they did so to a considerable extant). .... Disagreements were to be formally discussed, and external opinions sought if requires. Never had there been such a translation by committee. ...
They show themselves well aware of the dangers of consensus language:
An other thing we thinke good to admonish thee of that wee haue not tyed our selues to an vniformitie of phrasing, or to an identitie of words, as some peradenture would wish that we had done.... (nothing wrong with the typing - the "u" and the"v" were the other way round back then)
The translators were consciously conservative, and frequently introduced archaism and traditional readings, especially from Tyndale and Coverdale.
Their text ... does not contain large numbers of new words, as Shakespeare's plays did. ...
Similarly, the King James Bible looks backwards in its grammar, and preserves many of the forms and constructions which were falling out of use elsewhere.

(e.g.) digged ('dug'), gat ('got') and gotten, bare ('bore'), ... holpen ('helped')

To finish here is a bit from the original 1611 printing of Luke 15:29-32

And he answering said to his father, loe, these many yeeres doe I serue thee, neither transgressed I at any time thy commandement, and yet thou neuer gauest mee a kid, that I might make merry with my friends: But as soone as this thy sonne will come, which hath deuored thy liuing with harlots, thou hast killed for him the fatted calfe. And he said vnto him, Sonne, thou art euer with me, and all that I haue is thine. It was meete that we should make merry, and be glad: for this thy brother was dead, and is aliue againe: and was l ost, and is found." (boy that was hard to type!)

If one believes that they should only use the KJV why don't they use the original 1611 one and not the updated, changed one?

[KinaBolina]

I have limited experience with different kinds of Bibles, but of those I've read I prefer NIV. I was raised on the King James version and the New King James.

[Moluku]

I prefer the KJV. I was given my grandpa's Bible for Christmas.

[Followers4christ]

The best versions in my opinion are the NIV and KJV.If I had to choose between the two I would choose the KJV.God Bless :)

[dalej42]

I voted RSV, but I use the NRSV.

I enjoy the beauty of the languange of the KJV, but recent scholarship dates it.

[Vaneeza Malkah]

Mine isn't an option. I'd say 1st the TaNaKh (in Hebrew aka OT) and the Peshitta (in Aramaic aka NT)

[Im-revived]

The NIV is the most basic but NKJV is very hard to understand.

Im-revived

[Iosias]

The KJV is the best version!

[PaperMoon]

My church uses the NIV, but I prefer the New American Standard because it has retained some of the poetic language style. For me, it's easier to memorize long passages from the NAS, but I often use NIV for study. Also Helen Barrett Montgomery has a very readable version.

[Stacey]

I have kjv nkjv, niv, nlt, ncv, message and a greek-eng version of the new test.

...I read niv or nlt the most (prefering niv - but my nlt bible is more convenient). I read the kjv if I'm researching something (or the greek-eng) and the message I use more just to compare. My one-year bible is nlt as well - though i'd prefer niv - I just find nlt isn't as accurate as the niv to the original text.

My ncv is just the new testiment and it's very easy to read - I'm not sure I'd read it to study something though - more for casual reading.

lol in conclusion I like the greek! the KJV! and the NIV!

[*Liberty*]

I use both the NASB and the NRSB (which wasn't an option I don't think). I do not think that any one bible is better than the other as a whole; it greatly depends on the context in which it is used. I think for one just beginning to read scripture, NIV is best because it is simplest. However, for true indepth study, KJV is superior in many cases. I believe it depends on both the indiviual reader and the purpose for which it is read that determines which bible is best. :wave:

[Indi]

I think king james,

i've translated some of it when i looked stuff up on the internet.

I'm dutch, and i've got a totally different bible. it's printed in 2004 with all the normal language we use now a days.

but every thing will always be the same

Indi

[UncleRicky]

I favour the English Standard Version.

But as someone once said, the best translation is the one you will read every day!

Cheers,
Rick

http://unclerickysperigrinations.blogspot.com/

[hillsidehermit]

I like to quote KJV, but when I study I use three versions, two different versions of KJV and NIV.
the two different versions of KJV have different concordences. and NIV in case there are words I don't understand.

[Iosias]

The question is not which is the best version but which is the best Greek text? The Textus Receptus is the best text and most modern versions are not based upon it and so should not be used. :)

[kiwimac]

The question is not which is the best version but which is the best Greek text? The Textus Receptus is the best text and most modern versions are not based upon it and so should not be used. :)
Actually the TR is NOT the best Greek text. I advise those interested in looking at the following two urls which explain in plain english why that is so.

Title: Questions on Greek Texts
http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q112215BC

Title: Comprehensive History of the King James English Bible
http://www.gregandsheila.com/ag/kjv.htm

Also note the following link on "KJV-Onlism"

Title: New Age Bible Versions?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?S622135BC

Kiwimac

[Godslilgurlalways]

My church uses KJV, I like it but I like NIV it's broken down more where I can understand unstand it.So I like both:)

[mark53]

Actually the TR is NOT the best Greek text. I advise those interested in looking at the following two urls which explain in plain english why that is so.

Title: Questions on Greek Texts
http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q112215BC

Title: Comprehensive History of the King James English Bible
http://www.gregandsheila.com/ag/kjv.htm

Also note the following link on "KJV-Onlism"

Title: New Age Bible Versions?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?S622135BC

Kiwimac

The best story on explaining the difference between the 2 texts is thus:
The "Textus Receptus" is like having, say, this post handwritten, or typed, by say, 1000, people.
Then when all the copies are in, gathering them up and counting which words and phrases were there the most. This, then, becomes the 'original and best" version; NOT the original!

[Godisgr8r]

I like the NKJV.

[LavenderMoon]

Kjv

[AngCath]

hmmm... Revised English Bible and NRSV tied for #1

[*Starlight*]

I've heard that Concordant Literal New Testament is an interesting translation. :)

[runner_4_jc]

There's nothin like the good'ol original!!!;)

[runner_4_jc]

There's nothin like the good'ol original!!!;)
Though, i do believe theres nothing wrong with using another version to help learn more about it.

[jbran555]

I voted NIV but you should add The Message Version. It is pretty cool sometimes. It is really nice to have both NIV and The Message.

[cubanito]

Actually the TR is NOT the best Greek text. I advise those interested in looking at the following two urls which explain in plain english why that is so.

Title: Questions on Greek Texts
http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q112215BC

Title: Comprehensive History of the King James English Bible
http://www.gregandsheila.com/ag/kjv.htm

Also note the following link on "KJV-Onlism"

Title: New Age Bible Versions?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?S622135BC

Kiwimac

Thank you for the links. The reason I like the NASB is that while it preserves the same "wooden" transliteration philosophy of the KJV, it uses a wide variety of sources, and gives variant readings where applicable. I often use a free version in my PDA downloaded from olivetree.com called the "Literal version" which even preserves many of the idiomatic expressions. Many of the new KJV study versions also are good about that also. The NIV however, is uniformly horrendous IMO. It holds itself out to be a translation, when in fact it has more in common with paraphrases like The Message. I like versions like the Message and others that are easy to read, they serve a purpose and do not, as the NIV does, hold themselves out to be a serious translation. My beef with the NIV is that while it plays very loose with the language, it claims not to do so.

For example, we're studying acts and the leader was confused as to what the difference between the Holy Spirit and the Spirit of Jesus were in Acts 16: 6,7. The trouble was easily removed when it was pointed out to him that, once again, the NIV did not point out that the modifier "of Jesus" did not appear in many Greek manuscripts.

If you want easy to read, go to a paraphrase, or even the NIV. However, do not take the NIV's claim of scholarship seriously. It's a hack job unsuitable for serious study.

JR

[firestar]

I like having a few different ones and comparing

[newyorknewyork]

the message

niv worship bible

women's bible

[newyorknewyork]

the good news bible is great too

i really like bibles that are EASY to read and understand :)

i can't understand thee and thou and art and stuff like that

[mark53]

There's nothin like the good'ol original!!!;)

The trouble is there is no such thing found, at this stage!!! We only have thousands of copies with thousands of variations! The oldest copy of the OT is the Leningrad Codex about 1000AD! Though when they fully release what they have found with the Dead Sea Scrolls (minus Esther!) we will then have a copy about 1000 years ealier!

So for the last 1800 years or so we just have to put up with whatever Greek and Hebrew Testaments that the experts give us! :thumbsup:

[anusha]

NIV and KJV but NIV

[kittystrawberry]

The NKJV make more sense to me. That is like the only bible I use any way.

[ShanKaz]

I enjoy reading the NIV Bible!

[AngCath]

I don't read any of these

[Samuel_Rigby]

Does anyone like the ESV? I've recently switched to it from the NASB and I really like it. It is supposed to be a literal translation but with better sentence structure so it is easier to read and memorize.

[mattsmom]

Does anyone like the ESV? I've recently switched to it from the NASB and I really like it. It is supposed to be a literal translation but with better sentence structure so it is easier to read and memorize.

I purchased an ESV this weekend and I really like it as well. It does seem easier and clearer than the NASB. I think I may use both of them.

[Mac123]

The KJV has the advantage of being able to use a Strongs Cordance to find the original Hebrew, Caldee or Greek word as it is used in a particular verse to know its meaning, in context.

[jelvenko]

Personally, I prefer the NIV. But I also use NKJV.

[Deb456]

KJV

[Iosias]

Personally, I prefer the NIV. But I also use NKJV.

Does it not bother you that it is based upon the corrupted Greek text i.e. not on the Recieved Text or Textus Receptus?

[nickelodeon77]

Niv

[wildthing]

I perfer NIV or Message. Since I'm dyslexic KJV makes no sence at all I might as well be reading a Polish language Bible.

[Revelation 19:6]

Does it not bother you that it is based upon the corrupted Greek text i.e. not on the Recieved Text or Textus Receptus?

If someone recieves understanding through the NIV then what difference does it make? Remember also that the KJV is a translation of a translation and not the original text.

Peace be with you.

[Colabomb]

Does it not bother you that it is based upon the corrupted Greek text i.e. not on the Recieved Text or Textus Receptus?
You make the assumption that it is a corrupt text.

How do you know the RT is not corrupt?

[SolitarySoul]

KJV use to be my favorite, but I tend to like the translation of NKJV a little more sometimes

[mark53]

Does it not bother you that it is based upon the corrupted Greek text i.e. not on the Recieved Text or Textus Receptus?

Been answered many times previously here. But, basically, this text is also called the "Majority Text". This menas that the Greek text is worked out on the majority of witnesses, not the earliest like in the other versions.
To put it another way get 100+ people to handwrite this post and at the end gather all the copies together and work out the majority version from there. So the original version is NOT the Received or Majority version!

Does that make sense to you!?

[diana_ch]

I love my NIV, though I still do cross referencing with NKJV and other versions... especially if I'm preparing a Word or wanting to do a deeper study...

[pyrolizzard]

I voted KJV becase it's the most accurate translation. Some people shy away from it because of the fact that its in old English but its accutaly easy if you know how.

[cavell]

Yes the A..bsolutely V..ital version is where I stand. I have grown up with this version, I have become aquainted with it. Why change for modern thought. A little study, and the A.V. will reveal everything you want to know

[Kimberlyann]

I use NKJV. It's easier for me to understand.

[ChristianSister]

New Living Translation

[blakey]

I prefer the NKJV and the NIV

[Papa01]

I chose the NIV. I've just started using it, and I enjoy it.

[ChristInAction]

MSG is the best b'coz its so easy to understand

[Thankful75]

I prefer the NKJV but I also like the NIV as well.