Jacob4707
17th April 2007, 12:29 AM
What is your view and the Orthodox Church's view of this:
http://catholicity.elcore.net/ConfessionOfDositheus.html Greek Orthodox Patriarch Dositheus convened a Synod in Jerusalem on March, 1672. The occasion was the consecration of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, therefore it is also called the Synod of Bethlehem. The Synod also refuted article by article the confession of Cyril Lucaris, which appeared in Latin at Geneva in 1629, and in Greek, with the addition of four questions, in 1633. Lucaris, who died in 1638 as patriarch of Constantinople, had corresponded with Western scholars and had imbibed Calvinistic views.
The 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica called the Synod of Jerusalem "the most vital statement of faith made in the Greek Church during the past thousand years." And the Protestant scholar Philip Schaff wrote in his Creeds of Christendom: "This Synod is the most important in the modern history of the Eastern Church, and may be compared to the Council of Trent."
I highlighted a few points in red that struck me. Note that what follows is a summary of the articles. To read the full text, use the link above.
Schaff says this about Dositheus:
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/creeds1.v.vii.html
§ 17. The Synod of Jerusalem and the Confession of Dositheus, A.D. 1672.
Hardouin: Acta Conciliorum (Paris, 1715), Tom. XI. pp. 179–274.
Kimmel: Monumenta Fidei Ecclesiæ Orientalis, P. I. pp. 325–488; Prolegomena, pp. lxxv.–xcii.
On the Synod of Jerusalem, comp. also Ittig: Dissert. de Actis Synodi Hieros. a. 1672 sub Patr. Hiers. Dositheo adv. Calvinistas habitæ, Lips. 1696. Aymon: Monuments authentiques de la religion des Grecs, à la Haye, 1708. Basnage: Hist. de la religion des églises réformées, P. I. ch. xxxii. J. Covel: Account of the present Greek Church, Bk. I. ch. v. Schroeckh: Kirchengeschichte seit der Reformation, Bd. ix. (by Tzschirner), pp. 90–96. Gass: Symb. der griech. Kirche, pp. 79-84.
The Synod convened at Jerusalem in March, 1672, by Patriarch Dositheus, for the consecration of the restored Church of the Holy Nativity in Bethlehem,129 (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:toggle%28%27fnf_v.vii-p5.1%27%29;) issued a new Defense or Apology of Greek Orthodoxy. It is directed against Calvinism, which was still professed or secretly held by many admirers of Cyril Lucar. It is dated Jerusalem, March 16, 1672, and signed by Dositheus, Patriarch of Jerusalem and Palestine (otherwise little known), and by sixty-eight Eastern bishops and ecclesiastics, including some from Russia.130 (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:toggle%28%27fnf_v.vii-p6.4%27%29;)
This Synod is the most important in the modern history of the Eastern Church, and may be compared to the Council of Trent. Both fixed the doctrinal status of the Churches they represent, and both condemned the evangelical doctrines of Protestantism. Both were equally hierarchical and intolerant, and present a strange contrast to the first Synod held in Jerusalem, when 'the apostles and elders,' in the presence of 'the brethren,' freely discussed and adjusted, in a spirit of love, without anathemas, the great controversy between the Gentile and the Jewish Christians. The Synod of Jerusalem has been charged by Aymon and others with subserviency to the interests of Rome; Dositheus being in correspondence with Nointel, the French embassador at Constantinople. The Synod was held at a time when the Romanists and Calvinists in France fiercely disputed about the Eucharist, and were anxious to secure the support of the Greek Church. But although the Synod was chiefly aimed against Protestantism, and has no direct polemical reference 62 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/creeds1/png/0080=62.htm)to the Latin Church, it did not give up any of the distinctive Greek doctrines, or make any concessions to the claims of the Papacy.
The acts of the Synod of Jerusalem consist of six chapters, and a confession of Dositheus in eighteen decrees. Both are preceded by a pastoral letter giving an account of the occasion of this public confession in opposition to Calvinism and Lutheranism, which are condemned alike as being essentially the same heresy, notwithstanding some apparent differences.131 (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:toggle%28%27fnf_v.vii-p9.1%27%29;). The Answers of Patriarch Jeremiah given to Martin Crusius, Professor in Tübingen, and other Lutherans, in 1572, are approved by the Synod of Jerusalem, as they were by the Synod of Jassy, and thus clothed with a semi-symbolical authority. The Orthodox Confession of Peter Mogilas is likewise sanctioned again, but the Confession of Cyril Lucar is disowned as a forgery.
The Six Chapters are very prolix, and altogether polemical against the Confession which was circulated under the name of Cyril Lucar, and give large extracts from his homilies preached before the clergy and people of Constantinople to prove his orthodoxy. One anathema is not considered sufficient, and a threefold anathema is hurled against the heretical doctrines.
The Confessio Dosithei presents, in eighteen decrees or articles,132 (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:toggle%28%27fnf_v.vii-p12.1%27%29;) a positive statement of the orthodox faith. It follows the order of Cyril's Confession, which it is intended to refute. It is the most authoritative and complete doctrinal deliverance of the modern Greek Church on the controverted articles. It was formally transmitted by the Eastern Patriarchs to the Russian Church in 1721, and through it to certain Bishops of the Church of England, as an ultimatum to be received without further question or conference by all who would be in communion with the Orthodox Church. The eighteen decrees were also published in a Russian version (1838), but with a number of omissions and qualifications,133 (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:toggle%28%27fnf_v.vii-p13.5%27%29;) showing that, after all, the Russian branch of the Greek 63 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/creeds1/png/0081=63.htm)Church reserves to itself a certain freedom of further theological development. We give them here in a condensed summary from the original Greek:
Article I.—The doctrine of the Holy Trinity, with the single procession of the Spirit. (Πνεῦμα ἅγιον ἐκ τοῦ πατρὸς ἐκπορευόμενον. Against the Latins.)
Article II.—The Holy Scriptures must be interpreted, not by private judgment, but in accordance with the tradition of the Catholic Church, which can not err, or deceive, or be deceived, and is of equal authority with the Scriptures. (Essentially Romish, but without an infallible, visible head of the Church.)
Article III.—God has from eternity predestinated to glory those who would, in his foreknowledge, make good use of their free will in accepting the salvation, and has condemned those who would reject it. The Calvinistic doctrine of unconditional predestination is condemned as abominable, impious, and blasphemous.
Article IV.—The doctrine of creation. The triune God made all things, visible and invisible, except sin, which is contrary to his will, and originated in the Devil and in man.
Article V.—The doctrine of Providence. God foresees and permits (but does not foreordain) evil, and overrules it for good.
Article VI.—The primitive state and fall of man. Christ and the Virgin Mary are exempt from sin.
Article VII.—The doctrine of the incarnation of the Son of God, his death, resurrection, ascension, and return to judgment.
Article VIII.—The work of Christ. He is the only Mediator and Advocate for our sins; but the saints, and especially the immaculate Mother of our Lord, as also the holy angels, bring our prayers and petitions before him, and give them greater effect.
Article IX.—No one can be saved without faith, which is a certain persuasion, and works by love (i.e. the observance of the divine commandments). It justifies before Christ, and without it no one can please God.
Article X.—The holy Catholic and Apostolic Church comprehends 64 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/creeds1/png/0082=64.htm)all true believers in Christ, and is governed by Christ, the only head, through duly ordained bishops in unbroken succession. The doctrine of Calvinists, that bishops are not necessary, or that priests (presbyters) may be ordained by priests, and not by bishops only, is rejected.
Article XI.—Members of the Catholic Church are all the faithful, who firmly hold the faith of Christ as delivered by him, the apostles, and the holy synods, although some of them may be subject to various sins.
Article XII.—The Catholic Church is taught by the Holy Ghost, through prophets, apostles, holy fathers, and synods, and therefore can not err, or be deceived, or choose a lie for the truth. (Against Cyril; comp. Art. II.)
Article XIII.—Man is justified, not by faith alone, but also by works.
Article XIV.—Man has been debilitated by the fall, and lost the perfection and freedom from suffering, but not his intellectual and moral nature. He has still the free will (τὸ αὐτεξούσιον) or the power to choose and do good or to flee and hate evil (Matt. v. 46, 47 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Matt.5.html#Matt.5.46); Rom. i. 19 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Rom.1.html#Rom.1.19); ii. 14, 15 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Rom.2.html#Rom.2.14)). But good works done without faith can not contribute to our salvation; only the works of the regenerate, done under grace and with grace, are perfect, and render the one who does them worthy of salvation (σωτηρίας ἄξιον ποιεῖται τὸν ἐνεργοῦντα).
Article XV.—Teaches, with the Roman Church, the seven sacraments or mysteries (μυστὴρια), viz., baptism (τὸ ἅγιον βάπτισμα, Matt. xxviii. 19 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Matt.28.html#Matt.28.19)), confirmation (βεβαίωσις or χρίσμα, Luke xxiv. 49 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Luke.24.html#Luke.24.49); 2 Cor. i. 21 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.iiCor.1.html#iiCor.1.21); and Dionysius Areop.), ordination (ἱεροσύνη, Matt. xviii. 18 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Matt.18.html#Matt.18.18)), the unbloody sacrifice of the altar (ἡ ἀναίμακτος θυσία, Matt. xxvi. 26 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Matt.26.html#Matt.26.26), etc.), matrimony (γάμος, Matt. xix. 6 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Matt.19.html#Matt.19.6); Eph. v. 32 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Eph.5.html#Eph.5.32)), penance and confession (μετάνοια καὶ ἐξομολόγησις, John xx. 23 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.John.20.html#John.20.23); Luke xiii. 3, 5 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Luke.13.html#Luke.13.3)), and holy unction (τὸ ἅγιον ἔλαιον or εὐχέλαιον, Mark vi. 13 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Mark.6.html#Mark.6.13); James v. 14 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Jas.5.html#Jas.5.14)). Sacraments are not empty signs of divine promises (as circumcision), but they necessarily (ἐξ ἀνάγκης) confer grace (as ὄργανα δραστικὰ χάριτος).
Article XVI.—Teaches the necessity of baptism for salvation, baptismal regeneration (John iii. 5 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.John.3.html#John.3.5)), infant baptism, and the salvation of baptized infants (Matt. xix. 12 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Matt.19.html#Matt.19.12)). The effect of baptism is the remission of hereditary and previous actual sin, and the gift of the Holy Spirit. It can not be repeated; sins committed after baptism must be forgiven by priestly absolution on repentance and confession.
(continued next post)
http://catholicity.elcore.net/ConfessionOfDositheus.html Greek Orthodox Patriarch Dositheus convened a Synod in Jerusalem on March, 1672. The occasion was the consecration of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, therefore it is also called the Synod of Bethlehem. The Synod also refuted article by article the confession of Cyril Lucaris, which appeared in Latin at Geneva in 1629, and in Greek, with the addition of four questions, in 1633. Lucaris, who died in 1638 as patriarch of Constantinople, had corresponded with Western scholars and had imbibed Calvinistic views.
The 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica called the Synod of Jerusalem "the most vital statement of faith made in the Greek Church during the past thousand years." And the Protestant scholar Philip Schaff wrote in his Creeds of Christendom: "This Synod is the most important in the modern history of the Eastern Church, and may be compared to the Council of Trent."
I highlighted a few points in red that struck me. Note that what follows is a summary of the articles. To read the full text, use the link above.
Schaff says this about Dositheus:
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/creeds1.v.vii.html
§ 17. The Synod of Jerusalem and the Confession of Dositheus, A.D. 1672.
Hardouin: Acta Conciliorum (Paris, 1715), Tom. XI. pp. 179–274.
Kimmel: Monumenta Fidei Ecclesiæ Orientalis, P. I. pp. 325–488; Prolegomena, pp. lxxv.–xcii.
On the Synod of Jerusalem, comp. also Ittig: Dissert. de Actis Synodi Hieros. a. 1672 sub Patr. Hiers. Dositheo adv. Calvinistas habitæ, Lips. 1696. Aymon: Monuments authentiques de la religion des Grecs, à la Haye, 1708. Basnage: Hist. de la religion des églises réformées, P. I. ch. xxxii. J. Covel: Account of the present Greek Church, Bk. I. ch. v. Schroeckh: Kirchengeschichte seit der Reformation, Bd. ix. (by Tzschirner), pp. 90–96. Gass: Symb. der griech. Kirche, pp. 79-84.
The Synod convened at Jerusalem in March, 1672, by Patriarch Dositheus, for the consecration of the restored Church of the Holy Nativity in Bethlehem,129 (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:toggle%28%27fnf_v.vii-p5.1%27%29;) issued a new Defense or Apology of Greek Orthodoxy. It is directed against Calvinism, which was still professed or secretly held by many admirers of Cyril Lucar. It is dated Jerusalem, March 16, 1672, and signed by Dositheus, Patriarch of Jerusalem and Palestine (otherwise little known), and by sixty-eight Eastern bishops and ecclesiastics, including some from Russia.130 (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:toggle%28%27fnf_v.vii-p6.4%27%29;)
This Synod is the most important in the modern history of the Eastern Church, and may be compared to the Council of Trent. Both fixed the doctrinal status of the Churches they represent, and both condemned the evangelical doctrines of Protestantism. Both were equally hierarchical and intolerant, and present a strange contrast to the first Synod held in Jerusalem, when 'the apostles and elders,' in the presence of 'the brethren,' freely discussed and adjusted, in a spirit of love, without anathemas, the great controversy between the Gentile and the Jewish Christians. The Synod of Jerusalem has been charged by Aymon and others with subserviency to the interests of Rome; Dositheus being in correspondence with Nointel, the French embassador at Constantinople. The Synod was held at a time when the Romanists and Calvinists in France fiercely disputed about the Eucharist, and were anxious to secure the support of the Greek Church. But although the Synod was chiefly aimed against Protestantism, and has no direct polemical reference 62 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/creeds1/png/0080=62.htm)to the Latin Church, it did not give up any of the distinctive Greek doctrines, or make any concessions to the claims of the Papacy.
The acts of the Synod of Jerusalem consist of six chapters, and a confession of Dositheus in eighteen decrees. Both are preceded by a pastoral letter giving an account of the occasion of this public confession in opposition to Calvinism and Lutheranism, which are condemned alike as being essentially the same heresy, notwithstanding some apparent differences.131 (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:toggle%28%27fnf_v.vii-p9.1%27%29;). The Answers of Patriarch Jeremiah given to Martin Crusius, Professor in Tübingen, and other Lutherans, in 1572, are approved by the Synod of Jerusalem, as they were by the Synod of Jassy, and thus clothed with a semi-symbolical authority. The Orthodox Confession of Peter Mogilas is likewise sanctioned again, but the Confession of Cyril Lucar is disowned as a forgery.
The Six Chapters are very prolix, and altogether polemical against the Confession which was circulated under the name of Cyril Lucar, and give large extracts from his homilies preached before the clergy and people of Constantinople to prove his orthodoxy. One anathema is not considered sufficient, and a threefold anathema is hurled against the heretical doctrines.
The Confessio Dosithei presents, in eighteen decrees or articles,132 (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:toggle%28%27fnf_v.vii-p12.1%27%29;) a positive statement of the orthodox faith. It follows the order of Cyril's Confession, which it is intended to refute. It is the most authoritative and complete doctrinal deliverance of the modern Greek Church on the controverted articles. It was formally transmitted by the Eastern Patriarchs to the Russian Church in 1721, and through it to certain Bishops of the Church of England, as an ultimatum to be received without further question or conference by all who would be in communion with the Orthodox Church. The eighteen decrees were also published in a Russian version (1838), but with a number of omissions and qualifications,133 (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:toggle%28%27fnf_v.vii-p13.5%27%29;) showing that, after all, the Russian branch of the Greek 63 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/creeds1/png/0081=63.htm)Church reserves to itself a certain freedom of further theological development. We give them here in a condensed summary from the original Greek:
Article I.—The doctrine of the Holy Trinity, with the single procession of the Spirit. (Πνεῦμα ἅγιον ἐκ τοῦ πατρὸς ἐκπορευόμενον. Against the Latins.)
Article II.—The Holy Scriptures must be interpreted, not by private judgment, but in accordance with the tradition of the Catholic Church, which can not err, or deceive, or be deceived, and is of equal authority with the Scriptures. (Essentially Romish, but without an infallible, visible head of the Church.)
Article III.—God has from eternity predestinated to glory those who would, in his foreknowledge, make good use of their free will in accepting the salvation, and has condemned those who would reject it. The Calvinistic doctrine of unconditional predestination is condemned as abominable, impious, and blasphemous.
Article IV.—The doctrine of creation. The triune God made all things, visible and invisible, except sin, which is contrary to his will, and originated in the Devil and in man.
Article V.—The doctrine of Providence. God foresees and permits (but does not foreordain) evil, and overrules it for good.
Article VI.—The primitive state and fall of man. Christ and the Virgin Mary are exempt from sin.
Article VII.—The doctrine of the incarnation of the Son of God, his death, resurrection, ascension, and return to judgment.
Article VIII.—The work of Christ. He is the only Mediator and Advocate for our sins; but the saints, and especially the immaculate Mother of our Lord, as also the holy angels, bring our prayers and petitions before him, and give them greater effect.
Article IX.—No one can be saved without faith, which is a certain persuasion, and works by love (i.e. the observance of the divine commandments). It justifies before Christ, and without it no one can please God.
Article X.—The holy Catholic and Apostolic Church comprehends 64 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/creeds1/png/0082=64.htm)all true believers in Christ, and is governed by Christ, the only head, through duly ordained bishops in unbroken succession. The doctrine of Calvinists, that bishops are not necessary, or that priests (presbyters) may be ordained by priests, and not by bishops only, is rejected.
Article XI.—Members of the Catholic Church are all the faithful, who firmly hold the faith of Christ as delivered by him, the apostles, and the holy synods, although some of them may be subject to various sins.
Article XII.—The Catholic Church is taught by the Holy Ghost, through prophets, apostles, holy fathers, and synods, and therefore can not err, or be deceived, or choose a lie for the truth. (Against Cyril; comp. Art. II.)
Article XIII.—Man is justified, not by faith alone, but also by works.
Article XIV.—Man has been debilitated by the fall, and lost the perfection and freedom from suffering, but not his intellectual and moral nature. He has still the free will (τὸ αὐτεξούσιον) or the power to choose and do good or to flee and hate evil (Matt. v. 46, 47 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Matt.5.html#Matt.5.46); Rom. i. 19 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Rom.1.html#Rom.1.19); ii. 14, 15 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Rom.2.html#Rom.2.14)). But good works done without faith can not contribute to our salvation; only the works of the regenerate, done under grace and with grace, are perfect, and render the one who does them worthy of salvation (σωτηρίας ἄξιον ποιεῖται τὸν ἐνεργοῦντα).
Article XV.—Teaches, with the Roman Church, the seven sacraments or mysteries (μυστὴρια), viz., baptism (τὸ ἅγιον βάπτισμα, Matt. xxviii. 19 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Matt.28.html#Matt.28.19)), confirmation (βεβαίωσις or χρίσμα, Luke xxiv. 49 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Luke.24.html#Luke.24.49); 2 Cor. i. 21 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.iiCor.1.html#iiCor.1.21); and Dionysius Areop.), ordination (ἱεροσύνη, Matt. xviii. 18 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Matt.18.html#Matt.18.18)), the unbloody sacrifice of the altar (ἡ ἀναίμακτος θυσία, Matt. xxvi. 26 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Matt.26.html#Matt.26.26), etc.), matrimony (γάμος, Matt. xix. 6 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Matt.19.html#Matt.19.6); Eph. v. 32 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Eph.5.html#Eph.5.32)), penance and confession (μετάνοια καὶ ἐξομολόγησις, John xx. 23 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.John.20.html#John.20.23); Luke xiii. 3, 5 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Luke.13.html#Luke.13.3)), and holy unction (τὸ ἅγιον ἔλαιον or εὐχέλαιον, Mark vi. 13 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Mark.6.html#Mark.6.13); James v. 14 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Jas.5.html#Jas.5.14)). Sacraments are not empty signs of divine promises (as circumcision), but they necessarily (ἐξ ἀνάγκης) confer grace (as ὄργανα δραστικὰ χάριτος).
Article XVI.—Teaches the necessity of baptism for salvation, baptismal regeneration (John iii. 5 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.John.3.html#John.3.5)), infant baptism, and the salvation of baptized infants (Matt. xix. 12 (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bible/asv.Matt.19.html#Matt.19.12)). The effect of baptism is the remission of hereditary and previous actual sin, and the gift of the Holy Spirit. It can not be repeated; sins committed after baptism must be forgiven by priestly absolution on repentance and confession.
(continued next post)