chaoschristian
8th January 2007, 06:54 PM
I've been studying process theology, and I was led, in part, to the subject of panentheism.
I did a quick Wiki check, as a place to start, and encountered this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism):
Eastern and Oriental Orthodox Christianity
The Eastern Orthodox (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Orthodoxy) and Oriental Orthodox (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oriental_Orthodoxy#Oriental_Orthodox_Communion) Churches have a doctrine called panentheism to describe the relationship between the Uncreated (God (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God), who is omnipotent, eternal, and constant) and His creation that bears surface similarities with the panentheism described above but maintains a critical distinction.
Most specifically, these Churches teach that God is not the "watchmaker God" of the Western European (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe) Enlightenment (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment). Likewise, they teach that God is not the "stage magician God" who only shows up when performing miracles (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle). Instead, the teaching of both these Churches is that God is not merely necessary to have created the universe, but that His active presence is necessary in some way for every bit of creation, from smallest to greatest, to continue to exist at all. That is, God's energies (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energies_of_God) maintain all things and all beings, even if those beings have explicitly rejected Him. His love of creation is such that he will not withdraw His presence, which would be the ultimate form of slaughter, not merely imposing death but ending existence, altogether. By this token, the entirety of creation is sanctified, and thus no part of creation can be considered innately evil. This does not deny the existence of evil in a fallen (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fall_of_Man) universe, only that it is not an innate property of creation.
This Orthodox Christian panentheism is distinct from a "fundamentalist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalist)" panentheism in that it maintains an ontological gulf or distance between the created and the Uncreated. Creation is not "part of" God, and the Godhead is still distinct from creation; however, God is "within" all creation, thus the Orthodox parsing of the word is "pan-entheism" (God indwells in all things) and not "panen-theism" (All things are part of God but God is more than the sum of all things).
My questions are:
Does this accurately reflect what the members in this forum are taught in their churches?
What, in general, is the EO's stance on Creation? (not creationism, mind you, but God's Creation)
What is the general EO view on viceregency and humanity as God's stewards of Creation?
As per the rules, not here to preach or argue, but sincerely and genuinely wanted to learn.
Thank you.
I did a quick Wiki check, as a place to start, and encountered this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism):
Eastern and Oriental Orthodox Christianity
The Eastern Orthodox (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Orthodoxy) and Oriental Orthodox (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oriental_Orthodoxy#Oriental_Orthodox_Communion) Churches have a doctrine called panentheism to describe the relationship between the Uncreated (God (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God), who is omnipotent, eternal, and constant) and His creation that bears surface similarities with the panentheism described above but maintains a critical distinction.
Most specifically, these Churches teach that God is not the "watchmaker God" of the Western European (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe) Enlightenment (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment). Likewise, they teach that God is not the "stage magician God" who only shows up when performing miracles (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle). Instead, the teaching of both these Churches is that God is not merely necessary to have created the universe, but that His active presence is necessary in some way for every bit of creation, from smallest to greatest, to continue to exist at all. That is, God's energies (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energies_of_God) maintain all things and all beings, even if those beings have explicitly rejected Him. His love of creation is such that he will not withdraw His presence, which would be the ultimate form of slaughter, not merely imposing death but ending existence, altogether. By this token, the entirety of creation is sanctified, and thus no part of creation can be considered innately evil. This does not deny the existence of evil in a fallen (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fall_of_Man) universe, only that it is not an innate property of creation.
This Orthodox Christian panentheism is distinct from a "fundamentalist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalist)" panentheism in that it maintains an ontological gulf or distance between the created and the Uncreated. Creation is not "part of" God, and the Godhead is still distinct from creation; however, God is "within" all creation, thus the Orthodox parsing of the word is "pan-entheism" (God indwells in all things) and not "panen-theism" (All things are part of God but God is more than the sum of all things).
My questions are:
Does this accurately reflect what the members in this forum are taught in their churches?
What, in general, is the EO's stance on Creation? (not creationism, mind you, but God's Creation)
What is the general EO view on viceregency and humanity as God's stewards of Creation?
As per the rules, not here to preach or argue, but sincerely and genuinely wanted to learn.
Thank you.