View Full Version : The Un-evangelized
4Jesus
24th February 2003, 11:05 AM
He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. John 3:18
Furthermore, would God have made this wonderful truth known to one group of people (i.e., just to Jesus's disciples or to the Jews in Palestine at Pentecost), and not to the rest of the world? Unless all nations in all parts of the world have equal access at the same time to the Good News of Jesus Christ's atoning death, wouldn't that make God un-fair?
SpiritPsalmist
24th February 2003, 12:32 PM
Scripture does not say God is fair, it says He is Just.
I believe He did what He needed to do for all of mankind to make their decision. He specifically came for the House of Israel but the Gentiles have been grafted in. That's mercy. And I'm very greatful.
4Jesus
24th February 2003, 01:01 PM
It seems to me that God did make the Gospel accessible to all men. We read about Paul sailing to different places and the missionary efforts of the apostles. The known world was probably very small then because God wouldn't have only made the truth known to a few and ignored another segment of humanity wherein they would have died never hearing it.
dignitized
24th February 2003, 10:23 PM
4jesus: they are condemned for what? their unbelief in the name of Jesus. One cannot have unbelief in the name of Jesus without ever having heard it can one?
S Walch
25th February 2003, 02:18 PM
Well, as christians that is our task - To spead the word of Jesus to all the world!
It is then up to the person who hears it whether s/he believes in it.
It does say somewhere that on Judgement day God will Judge all the people fairly - so I'm guessing the people that hadn't heard abot Jesus when they died would then be Judged on what they had done in their lives - whether it was good or bad (some good, but most I'm guessing would be bad)
Athlon4all
25th February 2003, 07:39 PM
Romans 1:18-21 makes it clear on this issue:
Rom 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
Rom 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath showed it unto them.
Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Gotta love the balance of these verses! First we see God's justice in judging the unrighteous, and then makes it clear that God has clearly shown himself to all people. Another good scripture ios John 14:4-9. Gotta run!
S Walch
26th February 2003, 06:49 AM
Yesterday at 10:39 PM Athlon4all said this in Post #6 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=675588#post675588)
Romans 1:18-21 makes it clear on this issue:
Rom 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
Rom 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath showed it unto them.
Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Gotta love the balance of these verses! First we see God's justice in judging the unrighteous, and then makes it clear that God has clearly shown himself to all people. Another good scripture ios John 14:4-9. Gotta run!
My bible version of those passages makes that even more clearer!
Romans 1:18-20
18 But God shows his anger from heaven against all sinfull, wicked people who push the truth away from themselves.
19 For the truth about God is know to them instictively. God has put his knowledge in their Hearts.
20 From the time the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky and all that god made. They can clearly see his invisable quantaties - his eternal power and divine nature. so they have no excuse whatsoever for not knowing God.
Thanks for showing me that Athlon 4all!
OLDoMiNiON
26th February 2003, 07:43 AM
Hmm, although, consider a tribe in the Amazonian Jungle for instance, who has no contact with the outside world, and worships the silver birds that fly over head and leave a trail of glory across the sky! They have eaten any missionary that came to tell them the word of God, because they were hungry, and did not know any better - who can blame them, for didn't God make us with the need to eat?!?! They didn't understand their posh English accent anyway!
or consider the baby that dies inside the womb - before it has had the chance to hear the word of God and make a decission for itself.
Do they go to hell??? (a hard question i know, i have my own views i just wanna know yours.)
Are these people condemned because they have not heard the word of God, and had the oportunity to accept it as the truth??
4Jesus
26th February 2003, 11:06 AM
Today at 04:43 AM OLDoMiNiON said this in Post #8 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=676870#post676870)
Hmm, although, consider a tribe in the Amazonian Jungle for instance, who has no contact with the outside world, and worships the silver birds that fly over head and leave a trail of glory across the sky! They have eaten any missionary that came to tell them the word of God, because they were hungry, and did not know any better - who can blame them, for didn't God make us with the need to eat?!?! They didn't understand their posh English accent anyway!
What I'm saying is that originally when the gospel was first revealed at Pentecost, God did make it available to all makind. The known world was not that large so I say that God made it avialable to all men. What happened to it after that in successive generations is the fault of the people that came before. If people fail to pass the truth on or teach their children, can one assume that evangelization has already happened and people being ignorant is the fault of their ancestors and not God? Does re-evangelization need to occur? I did like Athlon4all's comment.
or consider the baby that dies inside the womb - before it has had the chance to hear the word of God and make a decission for itself.
Has that baby inside the womb had the opportunity to sin after the similtude of Adam? Ro.5:12-14
Do they go to hell??? (a hard question i know, i have my own views i just wanna know yours.)
Are these people condemned because they have not heard the word of God, and had the oportunity to accept it as the truth??
[/QUOTE]
OLDoMiNiON
26th February 2003, 11:21 AM
If people fail to pass the truth on or teach their children, can one assume that evangelization has already happened and people being ignorant is the fault of their ancestors and not God? Does re-evangelization need to occur?
I don't think everyone was tought the truth in the first place, and therefore the act of evangelisation is not complete! If it was, why has Jesus not returned yet? Because, at the present time, everyone on earth has not had the chance to accept and reject christ...
though it is admittedly a tough question
OLDoMiNiON
26th February 2003, 11:23 AM
Has that baby inside the womb had the opportunity to sin after the similtude of Adam? Ro.5:12-14
An innocent baby does not know right from wrong and therefore cannot be judged as a sinner, as they do not know what constitutes sin!
4Jesus
26th February 2003, 01:17 PM
Today at 08:21 AM OLDoMiNiON said this in Post #10 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=677126#post677126)
I don't think everyone was tought the truth in the first place, and therefore the act of evangelisation is not complete! If it was, why has Jesus not returned yet? Because, at the present time, everyone on earth has not had the chance to accept and reject christ...
though it is admittedly a tough question
Thanks for your comments OLDoMiNion, I appreciate you taking the time to discuss this. I was thinking about the code of Hammurabi (c.1728-1686 B.C.) the date of his reign is according to Albright, which it is believed would date him three centuries subsequent to the age of Abraham. The code which was found on a black stella by Jacques de Morgan in 1901-2 in Susa where it is believe was carried by Elamite raiders, has interesting parallels to the pentateuchal laws.
Here we have a king that was sixth of the First Dynasty of Babylon with laws or teaching that is similar to those in the OT. If we believe the Bible contains the truth, how could a heathen people possess similar information?
SoccerAaron
26th February 2003, 01:22 PM
24th February 2003 at 02:05 PM 4Jesus said this in Post #1 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=672859#post672859)
[COLOR=royalblue] God un-fair?
Show me where in the Bible it says he's fair.
OLDoMiNiON
26th February 2003, 01:27 PM
I really don't know enough about the subject to comment at the moment. I'll wait until a few others have posted, and i have found time to research it a bit more...
However,
how could a heathen people possess similar information?
Just because they are heathen, it doesn't mean they have always been. They may have strayed away from the truth, the same happens today.
SoccerAaron
26th February 2003, 01:27 PM
Today at 09:49 AM S Walch said this in Post #7 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=676821#post676821)
My bible version of those passages makes that even more clearer!
Romans 1:18-20
18 But God shows his anger from heaven against all sinfull, wicked people who push the truth away from themselves.
19 For the truth about God is know to them instictively. God has put his knowledge in their Hearts.
20 From the time the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky and all that god made. They can clearly see his invisable quantaties - his eternal power and divine nature. so they have no excuse whatsoever for not
knowing God.
Thanks for showing me that Athlon 4all!
What version is that?
Do they go to hell???
Depends. If they are of the elect, yes. If not, no.
There is no "Age of Reason" if thats what your asking. You can read the Bibel from front to back and you won't find a good verse supporting it.
An innocent baby does not know right from wrong and therefore cannot be judged as a sinner, as they do not know what constitutes sin!
But they have original sin.
OLDoMiNiON
26th February 2003, 01:44 PM
Depends. If they are of the elect, yes. If not, no.
There is no "Age of Reason" if thats what your asking. You can read the Bibel from front to back and you won't find a good verse supporting it
"of the elect" - please explain.
"There is no "Age of Reason" if thats what your asking" - of course not, it dependson the individual and their relationship with God.
"You can read the Bibel from front to back and you won't find a good verse supporting it." - have you read the whole bible, front to back? Define a "good verse".
But they have original sin
oh, so being the Just God that he is, he's going to condemn a little innocent babys soul to eternal torment because of what somone else did?!? I think not. He is a God of mercy and of compassion.
Like i say, it not upto us to judge someone, not even a little baby, it's upto God.
Matthew 7:1
"Do not judge, or you too will be judged."
Luke 6:37
"Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven."
S Walch
26th February 2003, 01:47 PM
Today at 04:27 PM SoccerAaron said this in Post #15 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=677302#post677302)
What version is that?
Depends. If they are of the elect, yes. If not, no.
There is no "Age of Reason" if thats what your asking. You can read the Bibel from front to back and you won't find a good verse supporting it.
But they have original sin.
My bible version is the New living Waters Version.
Yes, everybody has original sin - even an unborn child.
Where in the Bible does it say that until the whole world has the act of evangelisation will Jesus come again?
Itprobably does say that - but I can't remember where it says it (it is a long book you know!)
OLDoMiNiON
26th February 2003, 02:06 PM
Yes, everybody has original sin - even an unborn child.
Yes, but it doesn't mean that they go to hell. It's for God to decide, not you, or SoccerAaron, or anyone for that matter!
S Walch
26th February 2003, 02:20 PM
Today at 05:06 PM OLDoMiNiON said this in Post #18 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=677347#post677347)
Yes, but it doesn't mean that they go to hell. It's for God to decide, not you, or SoccerAaron, or anyone for that matter!
I never said anything about them going to hell - I was just conferming that they have original sin - but because they actually havent's commit a sin bythemselfes yet (ie lieing (sp?)) I pecticually doubpt they would go to hell.
OLDoMiNiON
26th February 2003, 02:21 PM
Do you have any scriptural support for the original sin issue?
S Walch
26th February 2003, 02:24 PM
Lemme check - it's in one of pauls letters somewhere.....
Edit: O.K - here it is:
Romans 5:12-15 :
12When Adam sinned, sin entered the entire human race. Adam's sin brought death, so death spread to everyone, for everyone sinned.
13 Yes, people sinned even before the law was given. And though there was no law to break, since it had not yet been given,
14 they all died anyway--even though they did not disobey an explicit commandment of God, as Adam did. What a contrast between Adam and Christ, who was yet to come!
15 And what a difference between our sin and God's generous gift of forgiveness. For this one man, Adam, brought death to many through his sin. But this other man, Jesus Christ, brought forgiveness to many through God's bountiful gift.
Quite self explanatory really.
OLDoMiNiON
26th February 2003, 02:49 PM
Romans 5:12-15 :
12When Adam sinned, sin entered the entire human race. Adam's sin brought death, so death spread to everyone, for everyone sinned.
13 Yes, people sinned even before the law was given. And though there was no law to break, since it had not yet been given,
14 they all died anyway--even though they did not disobey an explicit commandment of God, as Adam did. What a contrast between Adam and Christ, who was yet to come!
15 And what a difference between our sin and God's generous gift of forgiveness. For this one man, Adam, brought death to many through his sin. But this other man, Jesus Christ, brought forgiveness to many through God's bountiful gift.
try this translation, your sucks! :P
NIV.
Romans 5
Death Through Adam, Life Through Christ
12 Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because all sinned--
13 for before the law was given, sin was in the world. But sin is not taken into account when there is no law.
14 Nevertheless, death reigned from the time of Adam to the time of Moses, even over those who did not sin by breaking a command, as did Adam, who was a pattern of the one to come.
15 But the gift is not like the trespass. For if the many died by the trespass of the one man, how much more did God's grace and the gift that came by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ, overflow to the many!
or better yet, this one:
NASB
12 Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned--
13 for until the Law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.
15 But the free gift is not like the transgression. For if by the transgression of the one the many died, much more did the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one Man, Jesus Christ, abound to the many.
It's not talking about the sin that being passed through the generations, it's talking about the fact that we now have to die as a *result* of that sin. Even if it did back up Original Sin, it is only talking about the time of Adam until Moses, then everything was changed When Jesus died for our sins, and made us clean.
Come on. You need something better than that ;)
Also it says nothing about eternal damnation for someone who has committed no sin.
S Walch
26th February 2003, 02:51 PM
gah! Sometimes your too smart for your own good chris :P
I'll find the answer somewhere!
And my bible version doesn't suck! - It' fine thank you :P
Edit: Aha! Read until the end of Romans 5 oldo:
Romans 5:12-21:
12 When Adam sinned, sin entered the entire human race. Adam's sin brought death, so death spread to everyone, for everyone sinned.
13 Yes, people sinned even before the law was given. And though there was no law to break, since it had not yet been given,
14 they all died anyway--even though they did not disobey an explicit commandment of God, as Adam did. What a contrast between Adam and Christ, who was yet to come!
15 And what a difference between our sin and God's generous gift of forgiveness. For this one man, Adam, brought death to many through his sin. But this other man, Jesus Christ, brought forgiveness to many through God's bountiful gift.
16 And the result of God's gracious gift is very different from the result of that one man's sin. For Adam's sin led to condemnation, but we have the free gift of being accepted by God, even though we are guilty of many sins.
17 The sin of this one man, Adam, caused death to rule over us, but all who receive God's wonderful, gracious gift of righteousness will live in triumph over sin and death through this one man, Jesus Christ.
18 Yes, Adam's one sin brought condemnation upon everyone, but Christ's one act of righteousness makes all people right in God's sight and gives them life. 19 Because one person disobeyed God, many people became sinners. But because one other person obeyed God, many people will be made right in God's sight.
20 God's law was given so that all people could see how sinful they were. But as people sinned more and more, God's wonderful kindness became more abundant.
21 So just as sin ruled over all people and brought them to death, now God's wonderful kindness rules instead, giving us right standing with God and resulting in eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
So, that is saying that until you accept christ as your lord and saviour - then those people will still have adam's original sin.
Only through Christ can our sins be forgiven, as you personally know ;)
OLDoMiNiON
26th February 2003, 03:08 PM
So, that is saying that until you accept christ as your lord and saviour - then those people will still have adam's original sin.
and you use this as a basis to say that everyone is quilty of sin at birth? I think not.
When adam sinned, as a result we are all now destined to die at some point. It's only this that is passed down the generations imo, not the sin too!
I know there are other verses, but this verse doesn't seem to back up original sin atall, sorry :p
S Walch
26th February 2003, 03:10 PM
Erm....erm.......
Why id the Bible so long..... *hunts around for the correct verse*
OLDoMiNiON
26th February 2003, 03:14 PM
Yes, Adam's one sin brought condemnation upon everyone, but Christ's one act of righteousness makes all people right in God's sight and gives them life.
this suggests that we don't have to do anything for his salvation..
S Walch
26th February 2003, 03:16 PM
Today at 06:14 PM OLDoMiNiON said this in Post #26 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=677441#post677441)
this suggests that we don't have to do anything for his salvation..
That one verse yes, but when you take account of it in the whole passage- it is not.
Edit: I can't find anything else in pauls letters - which is weird for he repeats himself a few times in different letters - oh well.
Must be somewhere in the NT, but I can't be bothered searching for it right now :P
OLDoMiNiON
26th February 2003, 03:32 PM
true, yeh i did take that outta context to test you weren't just agreeing with my every word :P ;)
SoccerAaron:
There is no "Age of Reason" if thats what your asking. You can read the Bibel from front to back and you won't find a good verse supporting it.
No, maybe not in the bible, but we can see from observing children, that by the time they are 7, they are generally starting to figure out about right and wrong, and realising about the "gray areas" inbetween. Before that they have a certain innocence about them that you could say, to quote from LOTF; "proclaims no evil". Did jesus not say "let the children come to me"? and does he not instruct us to be like them? Think about it...
SoccerAaron
27th February 2003, 01:07 AM
Psalm 51:5 (ESV)
Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity,
and in sin did my mother conceive me.
Ephesians 2:1
And you were dead in the trespasses and sins
Genesis 8:21
And when the LORD smelled the pleasing aroma, the LORD said in his heart, "I will never again curse[1] the ground because of man, for the intention of man's heart is evil from his youth. Neither will I ever again strike down every living creature as I have done.
Romans 5:12-21
12Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned-- 13for sin indeed was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not counted where there is no law. 14Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was to come.
15But the free gift is not like the trespass. For if many died through one man's trespass, much more have the grace of God and the free gift by the grace of that one man Jesus Christ abounded for many. 16And the free gift is not like the result of that one man's sin. For the judgment following one trespass brought condemnation, but the free gift following many trespasses brought justification. 17If, because of one man's trespass, death reigned through that one man, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man Jesus Christ.
18Therefore, as one trespass[1] led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness[2] leads to justification and life for all men. 19For as by the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man's obedience the many will be made righteous. 20Now the law came in to increase the trespass, but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more, 21so that, as sin reigned in death, grace also might reign through righteousness leading to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
S Walch
27th February 2003, 12:42 PM
aha! Thank you SoccerAaron!
There you are chris :P
OLDoMiNiON
27th February 2003, 02:47 PM
Psalm 51:5 (ESV)
Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity,
and in sin did my mother conceive me.
Yes - good verse. Yet it's in the old testament, and is part of the old covenant. I dunno whether the rules have changed in the new one, but i should think so! we don't sacrifice animals anymore do we? can someone else have a deeper look into this for me since i have not got much time b4 i go away for the weekend.
Ephesians 2:1
And you were dead in the trespasses and sin
lol, how does that prove anything to do with original sin? It says nothing about birth, but death. ..and is also taken *completely* out of context!
"1As for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins,
2in which you used to live when you followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the kingdom of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are disobedient."
It's on about the sins of those who "follow the ways of this world", not of the sin that exists at birth.
Genesis 8:21
And when the LORD smelled the pleasing aroma, the LORD said in his heart, "I will never again curse[1] the ground because of man, for the intention of man's heart is evil from his youth. Neither will I ever again strike down every living creature as I have done.
again, completely mis-quoted!
1. it's before Jesus came to die for our sins, and therefore we are now in a new covenant, same applies as to the first scripture.
2. Youth:
youth
n. pl. youths (yths, ythz)
1)
a. The condition or quality of being young.
b. An early period of development or existence: a nation in its youth.
2) The time of life between childhood and maturity.
a. A young person, especially a young male in late adolescence.
b. (used with a sing. or pl. verb) Young people considered as a group.
Would he not have said "from his birth" if he meant that, not "from his youth". Yes, little kids can sometimes be quite evil.. i've been kicked in the unmentionables many a time by little children. But this does not mean to say that they are guilty of sin at birth! Come on. A kid see's someone kicking somone else as a joke, it thinks it's ok and imitates it. They hear someone swearing, and imitate that too - thats how they learn... but can a little baby be considered sinful? i think not, or atleast this verse does not prove so.
And we have discussed the Romans scripture above. It is questionable to say the least...
SoccerAaron
27th February 2003, 03:14 PM
So you say everything in the OT is discreditable?
So you sig means nothing. You must disprove the Psalms verse.
OLDoMiNiON
27th February 2003, 03:36 PM
So you say everything in the OT is discreditable?
no, not atall! I'm not saying that verse is wrong, and disproves Original Sin, infact it looks the opposite to me too, but i'd like to know if anyone else has looked into it further than me and get their views!
However, i was referring to the fact that sin in the old testament was attoned for in a different way than it is now, since we have the new covenant through Jesus!
So you sig means nothing. You must disprove the Psalms verse.
Lol, is my sig refering to sin? no.
I think the real question is: Does the new covenant through Jesus take effect only when we accept that Jesus is lord? .. and do those who can't make the decision for themselves (i.e. a little baby), still live in sin, even though they are completely ignorant of it!?
S Walch
27th February 2003, 03:40 PM
Today at 06:36 PM OLDoMiNiON said this in Post #33 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=679570#post679570)
no, not atall! I'm not saying that verse is wrong, and disproves Original Sin, infact it looks the opposite to me too, but i'd like to know if anyone else has looked into it further than me and get their views!
However, i was referring to the fact that sin in the old testament was attoned for in a different way than it is now, since we have the new covenant through Jesus!
Lol, is my sig refering to sin? no.
I think the real question is: Does the new covenant through Jesus take effect only when we accept that Jesus is lord? .. and do those who can't make the decision for themselves (i.e. a little baby), still live in sin, even though they are completely ignorant of it!?
Well jesus did say that he was the way, the truth and the life, and the only way to the father was through him - so I'm guessing he was saying that the old covenant applies to those that don't accept jesus - but when they do, there sins are washed clean and it's a new start in the New covenant brought to earth by jesus.
SoccerAaron
27th February 2003, 03:50 PM
is my sig refering to sin?
So it applies only to verses pertaining to sin?
OLDoMiNiON
27th February 2003, 04:00 PM
So it applies only to verses pertaining to sin?
don't be silly. please read what i said about the covenants, and answer my questions if you can.
OLDoMiNiON
27th February 2003, 04:02 PM
Well jesus did say that he was the way, the truth and the life, and the only way to the father was through him - so I'm guessing he was saying that the old covenant applies to those that don't accept jesus - but when they do, there sins are washed clean and it's a new start in the New covenant brought to earth by jesus.
So is a non-christian still under the old covenant? Should i go buy the lambs swalch? :P
S Walch
27th February 2003, 05:09 PM
Today at 07:02 PM OLDoMiNiON said this in Post #37 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=679605#post679605)
So is a non-christian still under the old covenant? Should i go buy the lambs swalch? :P
Well, Jews still sacrifice things today - for they still abide by the old covenant.
OLDoMiNiON
27th February 2003, 09:41 PM
Yes, but just because they abide by it, it doesn't mean to say that it is still in effect!
Job_38
27th February 2003, 09:47 PM
25th February 2003 at 01:23 AM Br. Max said this in Post #4 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=673972#post673972)
4jesus: they are condemned for what? their unbelief in the name of Jesus. One cannot have unbelief in the name of Jesus without ever having heard it can one?
Rom 2:12 For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;
Rom 2:13 (For not the hearers of the law [are] just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.
Rom 2:14 For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:
Rom 2:15 Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and [their] thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another
S Walch
28th February 2003, 02:03 PM
Today at 12:41 AM OLDoMiNiON said this in Post #39 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=680330#post680330)
Yes, but just because they abide by it, it doesn't mean to say that it is still in effect!
That's a good point.
I'll have to ask Carl Belcher about it - I believe he did a surmon on original sin - So I'll get the answer from him :P
Job_38
2nd March 2003, 03:31 AM
Let me ask:
Why would you **** someone by evangelism if not knowing saves them? ???
And, if a child goes to heaven when it dies, why would someone be against abortion?
OLDoMiNiON
2nd March 2003, 07:54 PM
And, if a child goes to heaven when it dies, why would someone be against abortion?
Gimmie a break, thats a rather silly question don't you think? - Some people are against abortion because you are killing someone, just as you shouldn't kill a fully grown person, you shouldn't kill a baby! People are also anti-abortion because they believe that you should not be able to play God, i.e. control who lives and dies, and worse - for it to be legal! Maybe some are against it because they believe the baby will go to hell, but it's the minority at most!
Why would you **** someone by evangelism if not knowing saves them? ???
Could you rephrase that please?
S Walch
2nd March 2003, 08:04 PM
Today at 06:31 AM Job_38 said this in Post #42 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=684739#post684739)
Let me ask:
Why would you **** someone by evangelism if not knowing saves them? ???
And, if a child goes to heaven when it dies, why would someone be against abortion?
Why, WHY bring abortion into this?
Abortion is the killing of a fetus - which is alive, just like a cell on your body is - it might not have eyes, ears, a mouth and all the vital organs yet - but I'm sure it's still a living thing.
And what's the **** mean?
Job_38
2nd March 2003, 08:33 PM
Forget that point.
I said: Why would you d*amn someone by evangelizes to them, IF they are not hellbound if they never heard the gospel?
OLDoMiNiON
2nd March 2003, 10:12 PM
Because God calls us to "make disciples of all nations". It's our duty and calling to do so!
Copyright ©2000-2008, ChristianForums.com