PDA

View Full Version : Context of Tongues, and Miracles, & more.


BeLedbyHisSpirit
31st August 2006, 04:25 AM
If you study the new testament, you will see that there are 3 types of Tongues. Or, maybe more accurately, there are at least 3 different contexts of Tongues in the New Testament.

1) Acts 2, the day of Pentecost, all the various people from different areas, countries, tongues, heard the Disciples preaching about God in their own language, which astonished everybody.

a) Either the Disciples were granted the ability to speak foreign languages for the sake of the audience(s),

or

b) God caused all the people to "HEAR" in their own language, regardless of which language the Disciples were actually speaking.

IN either case, the 1st context in a language of earthly understanding for the sake of furthering the Gospel.


2) According to 1 Corinthians 13 & 14, Paul speaks of Tongues of angels (a mystery language to the one who is praying in tongues). This type of tongues is a prayer offered to God, which builds up (edifies) the believer who is praying.

1 Cor 13:1 If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.


1 Cor 14:2 For one who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men, but to God; for no one understands, but in his spirit he speaks mysteries.

and

1 Cor 14:14 For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my mind is unfruitful.


3) Tongues with Interpretation - for the benefit of the church (assembling of 2 or more believers) to hear a word of God for their benefit.

1 Cor 14:13 Therefore let one who speaks in a tongue pray that he may interpret.

and

1 Cor 14:27 If anyone speaks in a tongue, it should be by two or at the most three, and each in turn, and let one interpret;
1 Cor 14:28 but if there is no interpreter, let him keep silent in the church; and let him speak to himself and to God.



Lastly,

Paul wrote:

1 Cor 14:5 Now I wish that you all spoke in tongues, but even more that you would prophesy;

and

1 Cor 14:18 I thank God, I speak in tongues more than you all;

BeLedbyHisSpirit
31st August 2006, 04:33 AM
Some tend to think that because a miracle occurs after a prayer, therefore the one who must have prayed is also Filled with the Spirit.

This is not necessarily true.


The reason I bring this point up is because people make assumptions regarding the Filling of the Spirit, and make up all types of examples to justify their conclusion.


I'm not totally in the know, but I do wish for people to ponder these points:


1) The original 12 disciples were given power to heal and do miracles BEFORE the day of Pentecost.

2) Miracles were occuring in Isreal by the hands of the prophets, people who loved God, and even at the pool where the angel stirred the water and would heal the 1st person into the pool. All before the day of Pentecost.

Hence, these people had not received the Holy Spirit, let alone be Filled with the Spirit, yet.

3) Just think about this: There are Baptist churches (which tend to disbelieve the teaching on the gifts of the Spirit as taught by Pentecostals, Assembly of Gods, and Charismatics), and yet when those Baptist Elders pray for healing of somebody in their assembly, as instructed in James 5:14, they too, get healing from God.

And we know (by consensus, anyway), that the Baptists are not Filled with the Spirit. Nevertheless, God hears their prayers.


Just consider these things when you study about the difference of being Born Again, and being Filled with the Spirit.

BeLedbyHisSpirit
31st August 2006, 04:37 AM
Read my posts here:


http://www.christianforums.com/t3317248-i-got-saved-a-couple-weeks-ago-andi-need-just-a-little-guidance.html