Hey, who locked the paedo thread?

[paleodoxy]

???

[higgs2]

???

I have my suspicions ^_^ May I just take this opportunity to say that the post that I did not get to post was to Naomi, saying that even if we do not agree on baptism and communion I would still like her to watch my children while my husband and I tour England. :P

[AngCath]

???

I was just about to comment on that thread too :(

[paleodoxy]

I was just about to comment on that thread too :(
Hey, our side got the last word! ;)

I squeezed my response in to contramundum just before it was locked.

[PaladinValer]

Probably the Queen Mum, who I saw on the thread.

[Naomi4Christ]

I have my suspicions ^_^ May I just take this opportunity to say that the post that I did not get to post was to Naomi, saying that even if we do not agree on baptism and communion I would still like her to watch my children while my husband and I tour England. :P

It would be my au pair doing the watching :D

[gtsecc]

As Anglicans, we don't have a theology, we just discuss thing theologically.
All of us, including myself, need to get along better and work harder at understanding why one another think differently.

[AngCath]

Hey, our side got the last word! ;)

I squeezed my response in to contramundum just before it was locked.

I guess you all will have to deal without the benefit of my wisdom :preach: :P ^_^

[Naomi4Christ]

I'd like to say that I really enjoyed that thread. I hope Pamela opens it again soon and we can get a chance to look at the scriptural support for both positions.

[AngCath]

As Anglicans, we don't have a theology, we just discuss thing theologically.
All of us, including myself, need to get along better and work harder at understanding why one another think differently.

Pardon?
Then why will I be taking "Systematic Theology" as part of my seminary training?

[Naomi4Christ]

I haven't read the thread, but if it became the least bit controversial then the staff tend to lock a thread to review it amongst the staff to see if it should be permanently locked due to a variety of reasons

I can see that pmcleanj locked it "for staff review"

~ ~

It's not too sinister. Sometimes staff reviews are there to give us a cooling down period. Sometimes to enable them to read over a 60-post thread without new additions. I suspect it will re-open soon because, IMV, there were no rule violations - and they are just double-checking this.

[higgs2]

I'd like to say that I really enjoyed that thread. I hope Pamela opens it again soon and we can get a chance to look at the scriptural support for both positions.

What did you enjoy about it?

[higgs2]

It would be my au pair doing the watching :D
I know. You're our tour guide :D

[Naomi4Christ]

I know. You're our tour guide :D

Pub crawl, then :)

[higgs2]

Pub crawl, then :)
I can't wait :)

[Naomi4Christ]

:)

Hey, I was just thinking - the title of this thread is probably not the best to outsiders.

[higgs2]

:)

Hey, I was just thinking - the title of this thread is probably not the best to outsiders.
ew :eek:

[higgs2]

Pardon?
Then why will I be taking "Systematic Theology" as part of my seminary training?
In order to learn how to think theologically?

[AngCath]

I know but I was asking the question to make a point. :)

[ContraMundum]

Hey, our side got the last word! ;)

But you're still wrong, and I'm still Anglican in faith and practice. :D

I squeezed my response in to contramundum just before it was locked.

Yes, and it was woeful. When the thread re-opens I will reply.

Young man, we have to talk about exegetical method and about you learning Greek. :D

[gtsecc]

Pardon?
Then why will I be taking "Systematic Theology" as part of my seminary training?
I think you know what I mean. We don't have one theology - we have, as +Frank might say polyformtheology.

[AngCath]

Yeah I know, I was a little grumpy at the time :)

[karen freeinchristman]

Yeah I know, I was a little grumpy at the time :)

:o What? AngCath, grumpy? Never.... !!!! ^_^

[AngCath]

:o What? AngCath, grumpy? Never.... !!!! ^_^

It's possible! ;)