PDA

View Full Version : Images that are not Icons?


Orthodox Andrew
8th September 2005, 05:49 PM
Is it wrong to have images of saints in forms of art that are not Icons. Like these ones of St. Nicholas Czar-Martyr?
http://www.therussianshop.com/russhop/imperial/42632.jpg

http://www.auburn.edu/academic/liberal_arts/foreign/russian/art/serov-nicholas.jpg

Matrona
8th September 2005, 06:30 PM
Photographs and oil paintings are both fine. The bust/sculpture/statue is something you'd probably be better off asking a priest about.

Lotar
8th September 2005, 06:33 PM
They sell a bust of St. Nicholas similair to what you show at the ROCOR cathedral in San Francisco, so it seems like it'd be okay.

Photini
8th September 2005, 06:40 PM
I'm sure they're fine. But not to venerate, of course.

Michael the Iconographer
8th September 2005, 06:40 PM
Depends on what you are using those images for. They are not fine for veneration, but they are fine to have as artwork.

Orthodox Andrew
8th September 2005, 09:07 PM
That clears it up. Thanks folks.:)

Shubunkin
8th September 2005, 11:58 PM
You had me worried about my doll collection there for a while. :eek: ... however, they are simply on display as a collection. :)

mae300
9th September 2005, 12:00 AM
As long as we aren't worshipping them and putting them before God.

xristos.anesti
9th September 2005, 02:34 AM
As long as we aren't worshipping them and putting them before God.

Truth.

Well said.

choirfiend
9th September 2005, 02:39 AM
Thank goodness we Orthodox don't worship images or put images before God! That would be bad indeed.

God is glorious in His saints!

mae300
9th September 2005, 02:45 AM
A TV, job, or a computer can very easily become an idol...something we end up putting before God...so it isn't just statutes................

Michael the Iconographer
9th September 2005, 11:20 AM
A TV, job, or a computer can very easily become an idol...something we end up putting before God...so it isn't just statutes................

One's particular jurisdiction has in many cases even become an idol, esp. when people make comments like "that is treason against the principles of my particular Orthodox jurisdiction." There are even some who make idols out of eggs by saying that only icons written in egg tempera are real icons.

Llauralin
9th September 2005, 03:04 PM
You had me worried about my doll collection there for a while. :eek: ... however, they are simply on display as a collection. :)
Hehe, yeah, I make 3-D artwork, and was thinking what! No more figures!?!?! I'm not any good at painting, and so was a bit worried for a moment there.

*Is much relieved*

Philip
9th September 2005, 03:19 PM
So, I can keep my driver's license, right?

moses916
9th September 2005, 03:55 PM
haha ^_^

Khaleas
9th September 2005, 03:58 PM
So, I can keep my driver's license, right?

You mean you ended up with driver's license picture worthy of worship??:bow:



;)

fieldlily
9th September 2005, 07:15 PM
I'm sure they're fine. But not to venerate, of course.

:amen: It is like we can have a picture of a family member and not venerate it or we can have a bust of a famous musician and not venerate it.

However, icons are special pictures which Eastern Christians (and some others) venerate. I like to think of them as theology in color. They are stylized representations of Christ, the Theotokos (his mother), a Saint, or biblical scene which have been created by iconographers. The famous ones are usually very old, but we do have many iconographers today who are busy painting new icons.

I have an icon corner here in my house where I have three icons. One is a copy of the famous Rublev's Holy Trinity. It shows three angels (or the visitors to Abraham in the Old Testament) who are representative of the Trinity. Notice the Eucharist in the center.

Anyway, here is a thumbnail. If you click on it to enlarge you'll get a better picture.

birdfriend...:crosseo: