PDA

View Full Version : Effeminate Gospel, Effeminate Christians


C.F.W. Walther
24th July 2005, 07:31 PM
I'm looking for the article in totem by Aaron D. Wolf. Here are some excerpts from it taken from this link.
http://degenhart.us/blog/?p=122


These familiar strains from the popular hymn “In The Garden” represent the modern American imagination of the essence of Christianity: a romantic fantasy in which a chivalric Jesus rescues me from my own loneliness and despair and fills all of my emotional needs. This effeminate picture of the Christian life, from the dramatic conversion experience to the long walks in the garden alone with “Jesus,” has produced generations of effeminate Christian men who either allow themselves to be consumed by their imaginary “walks with Jesus” or else drift away from church altogether, knowing that their best efforts at spiritual courtship will fall well short of the women who now, more than ever, fill the pew’s of American churches.




The image of the effeminate clergyman is nearly universal in America - not just among liberals but among self-identified conservatives. The myriad queer priests on the Catholic side has as their counterparts the femmy Protestant pastor who must rely on silly stories and Dr. Phil psychobabble to carry his sermons. Vasectomized fathers of 1.5 children make their vestments look like dresses as they tug at the heart-strings of men and women. Evangelical megachurch pastors, with their khakis and polo shirts, take up the role of vicar of Jesus-the-Boyfriend, as their sermons or chats insist on fanning the flames of passon for Christ instead of proclaiming the Passion of the Christ.




In her insightful work The Feminization of American Culture, Ann Douglas traces the problem of the effeminacy of the American Christian man to the disestablishment of churches. In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, the Congregationalist and Episcopalian churches that were established in the states along the East Coast were disestablished, and all of the civil benefits that those churches had enjoyed - the power to levy taxes to support the pastor and the church facilities, the social status for pastors that this system required and protected, the necessity of church membership for those who wished to enjoy certain social benefits - were stripped away. She is quick to point out that disestablishment had its own intellectual antecedents - in particular, the democratizing Yankee spirit known today as the American Way, the culture that ultimately produced television advertising and “Rock the Vote!” Outside of clerical circles, the leading lights of this age were averse to the idea of any sort of enforced religion. Thomas Jefferson, for example, supported the disestablishment of the Episcopal Church in Virginia.




This was a reworking of the Gospel in the spirit of the Enlightenment, a new, baptized form of individualism centered on the emotions, which fit in nicely with the democratizing effort to disestablish the churches. Since the masculine idea of “forced religion” became anathema, Yankee pastors increasingly turned into salesmen, and women, not heads of households, began to play dominant roles in churches, trading authority for “influence.”

C.F.W. Walther
24th July 2005, 08:34 PM
More quotes with some typing errors.


Jesus taught us to pray "Our Father" not because He lived in a male-dorninated society but because His saving mission involved granting us a share in His Divine Sonship through the "adoption of sons." Therefore, the very essence of Christianity is masculine, an expression of patriarchal authority and the place and inheritance enjoyed by the Firstborn Son. Such authority has long been maligned by the liberal mainline churches m America, which are happy to ordain women and, now. open homosexuals. Yet it is not merely the Scripture-denying mainlines who have been infected by this disease. The image of the effeminate clergyman is nearly universal in America—not just among liberals but among self-identified conservatives. The myriad queer priests on the Catholic side have as their counterpart the .femmy Protestant pastor who must rely on silly stories and Dr. Phil psychobabble to carry his sermons. Vasectomized fathers of 1.5 children make their vestments look like dresses as they tug at the heart-strings of men and women. Evangelical megachurch pastors, with their khakis and polo shirts, take up the role of vicar of ]esus-the-Boyfriend. as their sermons or chats insist on fanning the flames of passion for Chnst instead of proclaiming the Passion of Chnst. One popular conservative pastor even champions something he calls "Christian hedonism," in a book entitled, appropriately. Desiring God.
Gone are the liturgies that place the crucified Christ and His Body and Blood at the center, and gone are hymns that call God "a bulwark never failing." In their place are the ubiquitous and repetitive choruses that distort the message of historic Christianity and replace it with a celebration of feminine emotions: "The simplest of all love songs /1 want to bring to you / So I let my words be few / Jesus I am so in love with you,"
The modem "praise and worship" experience resembles a soft-rock concert (a genre made for women), where the "worship leader" and his swooning sidekicks, the praise band, take center stage. Each stands gazing into the middle distance (where the Spirit of God seems to be hovering above the congregation), his (or, more often, her) heels tapping while one hand grips the wireless microphone and the other is lifted toward the ceiling, as if serving as a conduit of sacramental grace.
This campy environment is supplemented by something called "small groups," a method of spiritual cognitive dissonance perfected by Bill Hybels at suburban Chicago's Willow Creek Community Church. Unlike the authoritarian "I-talk-and-you-listen" environment in which Christians traditionally learned the Scriptures and teachings of the Church, small groups are a "safe" environment in which believers can take turns interpreting the Bible and sharing all of their deepest traumas and experiences while a leader guides the conversation. The emphasis here is on vulnerability and openness, which, when coupled with group "accountability," have always been the hallmarks of behavior-modification therapy.
What happens when the self-identified "conservative" churches encourage men to behave as women, swooning "in the garden" and "knowing" Jesus in an imaginary romance, or in "safe'' small groups, or in effeminate "praise and worship" experiences? What happens to families when a church professes belief in the authority of the Bible and in the undeniable fact that marriage is between one man and one woman, then teaches husbands and fathers that the essence of the Faith is found within, in the desires of their own hearts?
The answer is all around us. Christian churches in .America have long lost their authority to speak prophetically both to the culture and to their own children. Christian fathers no longer see themselves as heads of households. .And. as concerned women rise up and try to fill the void that these men leave, they often end up forsaking their own natural roles as childbearers,





:)

Scholar in training
24th July 2005, 08:44 PM
I think that one of the worst effects of the "effeminate gospel" is that it portrays God as purely love, without justice. God is the Father, but not the Judge (a trademark among the universalist and New Age movements). It takes away Jesus' rebukes in Revelation, it avoids any connection with the Pharisees he turned tables over, it calls God cruel for killing off those who do nothing to protect the innocent, cultures that have no self-control and who would spread their ideas to and infect other cultures if they were left unchecked.

C.F.W. Walther
25th July 2005, 11:48 AM
This subject doesn't seem to be of much concern or our we to mired in the Willow Creek phenomenen to even say anything in support/against any of the article?








:confused:

BigNorsk
25th July 2005, 12:27 PM
I think anyone who considers forced religion and the ability of the church to levy taxes as the proper "masculine" religion should be sent out of the US on the next boat to join the Taliban where he properly belongs.

Marv

C.F.W. Walther
25th July 2005, 12:35 PM
I think anyone who considers forced religion and the ability of the church to levy taxes as the proper "masculine" religion should be sent out of the US on the next boat to join the Taliban where he properly belongs.

Marv

I'm a little slow on the "uptake" like Columbo". Could you explain that responce?






:confused:

JCrawf
25th July 2005, 03:47 PM
I do have to say that there was quite a bit of debate in a Greek journal I participate in when I translated Matthew 10:1-8 as follows:


And having called to him his twelve disciples he gave them authority over unclean spirits so as to cast them out and to take care of every suffering and every effeminacy. Of the twelve apostles the names are these: first Simon who is being called Peter and Andreas [Andrew] his brother, and Jakob [James] the son of Zebedee and John his brother, Phillip and Bartholomaeus [Bartholomew], Thomas and Matthew the publican, Jakob [James] the son of Alphaeus and Thaddaeus, Simon the Cananaean and Judas Iscariot the one also who was betraying him.

These the Twelve Jesus sent out giving them word saying, "Of the path of the gentiles do not go and of a city of Samaritans do not enter; but go instead toward the perishing sheep of the house of Israel. And while going, cry out by voice of a herald saying that, 'Near is the dominion of the heavens." - Matt. 10:1-8

Noson (noson) was translated as suffering, being that, though disease would have been valid, suffering is a major theme in Judeo-Christian writing. For Malakian (malakian), I used effeminacy, not as a degredation of feminine qualities, but rather to convey excessive softness or self-indulgence. This would have possibly been one connotation understood during the period that the Greek would have been used. Publican was used in the translation of telwnhV (telônęs) due to fact that Rome was in control of the area, so thusly the Latin word publicanus would have been would have been used in regard to tax collectors or a person 'farming the public', that is, Roman revenue.

Pax Vobiscum,

John

JCrawf
25th July 2005, 04:06 PM
The myriad queer priests on the Catholic side

I don't know about a myriad. But there is a difference to me between a priest that may be tempted by homosexual desires, but confesses them and remains chaste and celebate and one who lives and advocates the homosexual lifestyle.

I don't think it plausible, nor reasonable for a person who lives and advocates the homosexual lifestyle to be considered living a life in the Spirit. It would seem that whoever administers the Gospel is not only called to that position, but lives the Gospel message and not some 'other Gospel'. One cannot be called to the life of the Spirit and remain in life according to the flesh. We have to persevere in the life of the Spirit in order to have any certainty of salvation.

Pax Tecum,

John