View Full Version : Salvos Stuck in the Past?
chaplainjared
31st March 2005, 09:05 PM
Lets face it, that salvation army used to be a massive, radical christian movement at the forefront of evangelism, and a movement who was 'with the times' and new how to reach the lost souls.
I think its sad to see what we have become. So stuck in the old ways of doing things. Sure, that worked 50 - 100 years ago, but it is now 2005, and i once herd a captain say "going to the salvation army for sunday worship has become like going through a time warp every saturday night in our sleep, we wake up sunday morning and all of a sudden we have gone back 50 years in time".....
Come on people, i think its safe to say that IN GENERAL, the salvation army is dead and dying... If our corps (churches) keep diminishing in numbers then in 20 years we wont have a church left, and of course, if the corp dies, the services the corp offers to the community (family support etc) is also made extinct.
I read on the Salvation army's australian web site yesterday that last financial year the salvation army made a LOSS of 5 MILLION DOLLARS. How long can we sustain this?
We need to make our services relevant to TODAYS community, to Draw the lost into a relationship with Jesus. and if we are honest, a larger corp means a larger income to serve the community like we love to do, and what we are good at....
Have i opened a hornets nest here????
Andy Broadley
31st March 2005, 09:56 PM
I thinkl this should neatly take care of any concerns about us dying
Statistics
From 2005 Year Book
Countries where The Salvation Army is at work
A country in which the Army serves is defined in two ways:
(i) Politically
(ii) Where the General has given approval to the work, thus officially recognising it, ensuring it has legal identity and a Deed Poll is published to acknowledge this.
As far as political status is concerned, for the Army’s purposes, three categories are recognised:
(a) Independent countries, eg USA and New Zealand;
(b) Internally independent political entities which are under the protection of another country in matters of defence and foreign affairs, eg The Færoes, Isle of Man, Puerto Rico;
(c) Colonies and other dependent political units, eg Bermuda, French Guiana, Guam, Guernsey, Jersey, Virgin Islands.
Administrative subdivisions of a country such as Wales and Scotland in the UK are not recognised as separate countries for this purpose. The countries fulfilling the quoted criteria, with the date on which the work was officially recognised in brackets, are as follows:
Angola.....(1985)
Antigua.....(1903)
Argentina.....(1890)
Australia.....(1881)
Austria.....(1927)
Bahamas.....(1931)
Bangladesh.....(1970)
Barbados.....(1898)
Belgium.....(1889)
Belize.....(1915)
Bermuda.....(1896)
Bolivia.....(1920)
Botswana.....(1997)
Brazil.....(1922)
Canada.....(1882)
Chile.....(1909)
China.....(1916)
Colombia.....(1985)
Congo (Brazzaville) 1937)
Congo (Kinshasa).....(1934)
Costa Rica.....(1907 and 1975)
Cuba.....(1918)
Czech Republic.....(1919 and 1990)
Denmark.....(1887)
Dominican Republic
.....(1995)
Ecuador.....(1985)
El Salvador.....(1989)
Estonia.....(1927 and 1996)
Færoes, The.....(1924)
Fiji.....(1973)
Finland.....(1889)
France.....(1881)
French Guiana.....(1980)
Georgia.....(1993)
Germany.....(1886)
Ghana.....(1922)
Grenada.....(1902)
Guam.....(1994)
Guatemala.....(1976)
Guernsey.....(1879)
Guyana.....(1895)Haiti.....(1950)
Honduras.....(2000)
Hong Kong.....(1930)
Hungary.....(1924 and 1990)
Iceland.....(1895)
India.....(1882)
Indonesia.....(1894)
Ireland, Republic of (Eire).....(1880)
Isle of Man.....(1883)
Italy.....(1887)
Jamaica.....(1887)
Japan.....(1895)
Jersey.....(1879)
Kenya.....(1921)
Korea.....(1908)
Latvia.....(1923 and 1990)
Lesotho.....(1969)
Liberia.....(1988)
Macau (2000)
Malawi.....(1967)
Malaysia.....(1938)
Marshall Islands.....(1985)
Mexico.....(1937)
Micronesia.....(1993)
Moldova.....(1994)
Mozambique.....(1916)
Myanmar.....(1915)
Netherlands, The.....(1887)
New Zealand.....(1883)
Nigeria.....(1920)
Norway.....(1888)
Pakistan.....(1883)
Panama.....(1904)
Papua New Guinea.....(1956)
Paraguay.....(1910)
Peru.....(1910)
Philippines, The.....(1937)
Portugal.....(1971)
Puerto Rico.....(1962)Romania.....(1999)
Russia.....(1913 and 1991)
Rwanda.....(1996)
St Christopher Nevis (St Kitts).....(1904)
St Helena.....(1884)
St Lucia.....(1902)
St Maarten.....(1999)
St Vincent.....(1903)
Singapore.....(1935)
South Africa.....(1883)
Spain.....(1971)
Sri Lanka.....(1883)
Suriname.....(1926)
Swaziland.....(1960)
Sweden.....(1882)
Switzerland.....(1882)
Taiwan.....(1965)
Tanzania.....(1933)
Tonga.....(1986)
Trinidad and Tobago.....(1901)
Uganda.....(1931)
Ukraine.....(1993)
United Kingdom.....(1865)
United States of
America.....(1880)
Uruguay.....(1890)
Venezuela.....(1972)
Virgin Islands.....(1917)
Zambia.....(1922)
Zimbabwe.....(1891)
International Statistics (as at 1 January 2004)
Countries and other territories where SA serves .....109
Languages used in SA work .....175
Corps, outposts, societies, new plants and recovery churches .....15,241
Goodwill centres .....221
Officers .....25,792
Active .....17,199
Retired .....8,593
Auxiliary-captains .....216
Lieutenants .....401
Envoys/sergeants, full-time .....901
Cadets .....1,207
Employees .....107,369
Senior soldiers .....1,034,975
Adherents .....187,622
Junior soldiers .....366,900
Corps cadets .....33,398
Senior band musicians .....26,642
Senior songsters .....90,282
Other senior musical group members .....13,907
Senior and young people’s local officers .....120,585
Women’s Ministries (all groups) – members .....627,378
League of mercy – members .....88,217
SAMFmembers .....8,257
Over-60 clubs – members .....100,831
Men’s fellowships – members .....49,909
Young people’s bands – members .....13,400
Young people’s singing companies – members .....76,755
Other young people’s music groups – members .....34,641
Sunday schools – members .....616,326
Junior youth groups (scouts, guides, etc, and clubs) – members .....163,215
Senior youth groups – members .....69,897
Corps-based community development programmes .....764
Beneficiaries/clients .....1,166,947
Thrift stores/charity shops (corps/territorial) .....1,536
Recycling centres .....17
http://www1.salvationarmy.org/icons/ecblank.gif
Social Programme
ResidentialHostels for homeless and transient .....615
Capacity .....31,769
Emergency lodges .....233
Capacity .....10,333
Children’s homes .....206
Capacity .....9,377
Homes for the elderly .....175
Capacity .....12,036
Homes for the disabled .....49
Capacity .....1,620
Homes for the blind .....6
Capacity .....272
Remand and probation homes .....61
Capacity .....936
Homes for street children .....26
Capacity .....585
Mother and baby homes .....47
Capacity .....1,536
Training centres for families .....14
Capacity .....252
Care homes for vulnerable people .....57 Capacity .....800
Women’s and men’s refuge centres .....114 Capacity .....2,336
Other residential care homes/hostels .....98
Capacity .....5,098
Day Care Community centres .....460
Early childhood education
centres .....227
Capacity .....11,533
Day centres for the elderly .....155
Capacity .....3,473
Play groups .....163
Capacity .....4,682
Day centre for the hearing impaired .....2
Capacity .....60
Day centres for street children .....6
Capacity .....164
Day nurseries .....205
Capacity .....15,500
Drop-in centres for youth .....185
Other day care centres .....247 .....
Capacity .....5,948
Addiction Dependency
Non-residential programmes .....71
Capacity .....2,383
Residential programmes .....209
Capacity .....12,513
Harbour Light programmes .....40
Capacity .....3,951
Other services for those with addictions .....44
Capacity .....3,716
Service to the Armed Forces
Clubs and canteens .....21
Mobile units for service personnel .....27
Chaplains .....22
Emergency Disaster Response
Disaster rehabilitation schemes .....438
Participants .....2,996
Refugee programmes – host country .....4
Participants .....4,006
Other response programmes .....7
Participants .....118,261http://www1.salvationarmy.org/icons/ecblank.gif
Services to the Community
Prisoners visited .....308,814
Prisoners helped on discharge .....172,836
Police courts – people helped .....240,919
Missing persons – applications .....20,110
number traced .....9,074
Night patrol/anti-suicide –
number helped .....102,416
Community youth programmes .....206
Beneficiaries .....50,286
Employment bureaux – applications .....396,538 initial referrals .....100,865
Counselling – people helped .....503,371
General relief – people helped .....16,268,855
Emergency relief (fire, flood,
etc) – people helped .....2,133,696
Emergency mobile units .....1,333
Feeding Centres .....1,123
Restaurants and cafes .....68
Thrift stores/charity shops (social) .....1,327
Apartments for elderly .....1,756
Capacity .....6,182
Hostels for students, workers, etc .....67
Capacity .....4,202
Land settlements
(SA villages, farms etc) .....11
Capacity .....1,638
Social Services summer camps .....98
Participants .....12,939
Other services to the community
(unspecified) .....192
Beneficiaries .....18,112,605
Health Programme
General hospitals .....21
Capacity .....2,583
Maternity hospitals .....7
Capacity .....191
Other specialist hospitals .....7
Capacity .....363
Specialist clinics .....32 .....
Capacity .....7,610
General clinics/health centres .....149
Capacity .....416
Mobile clinics/community health posts .....45
Number of inpatients .....146,876
Number of outpatients .....920,872
Number of doctors/medics .....2,306
Invalid/convalescent homes .....4 .....
Capacity .....225
Health education programmes
(HIV/Aids, etc) .....193
Beneficiaries .....148,126
Day care programmes .....3
Education Programme
Kindergarten/sub primary .....579
Primary schools .....1,020
Upper primary and middle schools .....66
Secondary and high schools .....156
Vocational training schools/centres .....76
Number of pupils .....446,327
Number of teachers .....14,153
Schools for the blind
(included in above totals) .....9
Schools for the disabled
(included in above totals) .....8
Colleges, universities, staff training and development study and distance learning centres .....24
http://www1.salvationarmy.org/ihq/www_sa.nsf/footer_grey.gif
Evangelina
1st April 2005, 12:32 AM
Ironically, considering I'm so lacking in affection for the traditional paraphenalia... I don't think the SA is anywhere near dying. I admit God has been kind to me by placing me in 3 successive non-trad, progressive corps, so maybe that's why my outlook is so positive :) But I think that while maybe the deadwood is starting to fall, there seem to be passionate people everywhere - and that's a good sign.
I'll share with you a passage I felt led to share the last time someone expressed pessimism to me about the future of the army...
The hand of the LORD was upon me, and he brought me out by the Spirit of the LORD and set me in the middle of a valley; it was full of bones. He led me back and forth among them, and I saw a great many bones on the floor of the valley, bones that were very dry.He asked me, "Son of man, can these bones live?" I said, "O Sovereign LORD , you alone know."
Then he said to me, "Prophesy to these bones and say to them, 'Dry bones, hear the word of the LORD ! This is what the Sovereign LORD says to these bones: I will make breath enter you, and you will come to life. I will attach tendons to you and make flesh come upon you and cover you with skin; I will put breath in you, and you will come to life. Then you will know that I am the LORD .' "
So I prophesied as I was commanded. And as I was prophesying, there was a noise, a rattling sound, and the bones came together, bone to bone. I looked, and tendons and flesh appeared on them and skin covered them, but there was no breath in them.
Then he said to me, "Prophesy to the breath; prophesy, son of man, and say to it, 'This is what the Sovereign LORD says: Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe into these slain, that they may live.' " So I prophesied as he commanded me, and breath entered them; they came to life and stood up on their feet-a vast army.
Then he said to me: "Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel. They say, 'Our bones are dried up and our hope is gone; we are cut off.' Therefore prophesy and say to them: 'This is what the Sovereign LORD says: O my people, I am going to open your graves and bring you up from them.
Ezekial 37:1-12
Pray. If need be, personally ask every Salvo you know what you can pray for, for them... and pray. It's the best all-round remedy I've come across :)
Abiel
1st April 2005, 06:05 AM
Yes we need to be upto date. But I am dubious about the phrase 'relevant worship'. I hear that a lot from the alove stuff. We will never be able to keep up if we persue modern taste all the time. And what's relevant for my 6 year old, is different for a 16 year old, 37 year old, 86 year old.
What does God want? What is 'relevant worship' to him? Worship is always towards the creator, not the creature.
chickette
3rd April 2005, 07:59 AM
I partly agree, partly disagree. Many corps are 'dying out' while many others are growing. There are only a couple of corps in my area with youth groups. The rest are very traditionally focused, which can be an issue at times and other times wont be....It differs for each corp I think.
Mmm....Did this make any sense? :confused:
chaplainjared
6th April 2005, 12:15 AM
This is a little bothering -
Officers .....25,792
Active .....17,199
Retired .....8,593
If half our officers are retired, then are we an aging army?, and is an aging army in decline?
"relevant worship"
I believe relevant worship is worship that draws the unchurched. Surely this HAS to be our priority. Our job is to make influence people into a knowledge and understanding of Jesus Christ right???
Then regardless of what I like, or what you like, we need to make worship meaningfull to the lost out there!
I feel that many corps are stuck in the past a little, and use worship music that only people over 50yrs of age would like. What is the point of this?
Surely if you have to cater for both young and old then do that....YES it probably is stepping out of the comfort zone, but progress needs to be made.
play a bit of both....music that would relate to the older generation and the young!
Or maybe use different instruments and a slightly different tune to older songs. where is the improvisation in alot of our corps?
General william booth once said "why should the devil have all the good songs"....
well, in the eyes of many people (most under 30 - 35) the devil has got all the good music back again, because we just want to keep singing all the same ones from the past....
im sure that many older people, and some younger people would disagree with me, but im sure that the majority out there would say that we need to progress.
The Salvation Army used to be at the forefront of worship, writing new songs etc. are we anymore?
In my corp, we do quite a bit of half old half new worship and it works pretty well, when i first started at my corp it was all old songs, and i was one of 3 others between 12 - 24 yrs of age, while the average age of the corp was 60....
Since the introduction of more modern music, we have grown significantly. We now have at least 20 young people come to our services, while the older generation is still attending faithfully also.
The simple word is "relevance"
Dare i say a huge majority of people aged 14 - 35 would not find the old stlye of worship relavant to them, If we did all 'song book songs' and 'brass band' my mother would not be attending my church with me thats for sure.
Andy Broadley
6th April 2005, 04:08 AM
This is a little bothering -
Officers .....25,792
Active .....17,199
Retired .....8,593
If half our officers are retired, then are we an aging army?, and is an aging army in decline?
"relevant worship"
I believe relevant worship is worship that draws the unchurched. Surely this HAS to be our priority. Our job is to make influence people into a knowledge and understanding of Jesus Christ right???
Then regardless of what I like, or what you like, we need to make worship meaningfull to the lost out there!
I feel that many corps are stuck in the past a little, and use worship music that only people over 50yrs of age would like. What is the point of this?
Surely if you have to cater for both young and old then do that....YES it probably is stepping out of the comfort zone, but progress needs to be made.
play a bit of both....music that would relate to the older generation and the young!
Or maybe use different instruments and a slightly different tune to older songs. where is the improvisation in alot of our corps?
General william booth once said "why should the devil have all the good songs"....
well, in the eyes of many people (most under 30 - 35) the devil has got all the good music back again, because we just want to keep singing all the same ones from the past....
im sure that many older people, and some younger people would disagree with me, but im sure that the majority out there would say that we need to progress.
The Salvation Army used to be at the forefront of worship, writing new songs etc. are we anymore?
In my corp, we do quite a bit of half old half new worship and it works pretty well, when i first started at my corp it was all old songs, and i was one of 3 others between 12 - 24 yrs of age, while the average age of the corp was 60....
Since the introduction of more modern music, we have grown significantly. We now have at least 20 young people come to our services, while the older generation is still attending faithfully also.
The simple word is "relevance"
Dare i say a huge majority of people aged 14 - 35 would not find the old stlye of worship relavant to them, If we did all 'song book songs' and 'brass band' my mother would not be attending my church with me thats for sure.
Whilst I would agree with much od this in principal, we must also take care to ensure that we don't chuck out the baby with the bathwater. The Army needs to move forwards, of this there is no doubt. But the best way of doing this is with a mix of old and new. As far as 'relevence' goes, my 6 year old, who is heavily into Veggie tales etc. was recently seen to be jumping up and down on his chair in an evening meeting, clapping loudly to "I'll go in the strength of the Lord". So 'traditional' Army worship is by no means lost on young people or those without an Army background
chickette
6th April 2005, 07:46 AM
The Salvation Army used to be at the forefront of worship, writing new songs etc. are we anymore?
I don't know if u have heard of Soteria Music Ministries but they have written some new songs that are excellent which is on their album 'I'll Fight.' There is also an older song that they have put to different music and it's definately one of my favourites. :thumbsup:
chaplainjared
8th April 2005, 03:56 AM
I have heard of Soteria Music Ministries and they are fantastic. However they are the only salvo group writing modern, relevant and very 'salvo' praise and worship that i know of. Does anyone know of any other groups that are? I would like to find out and give it a listen.
Warren Peace
8th April 2005, 05:46 AM
This is a little bothering -
Officers .....25,792
Active .....17,199
Retired .....8,593
If half our officers are retired, then are we an aging army?, and is an aging army in decline?
Not to split hairs, but 8,593 is not half of 25,792... it's almost exactly a third.
I can tell you one thing: Here in Canada many of the "retired" officers are still pretty active. They may not be in active officer roles, but they are active in the local corps and as representatives of the Salvation Army as a whole. This is encouraging.
Don't be fooled by statistics... we are alive and well! Maybe not in the same capacity as we used to be, but there are many candidates going into training in the next couple of years here in Canada, including my wife and I.
Keep in mind that there are a lot of people who attend Salvation Army corps and are not listed as soldiers or adherents. They likely don't show up in the numbers, but they still tithe.
Blessings...
Evangelina
8th April 2005, 08:38 AM
Jared and chickette,
I haven't heard of Soteria, we sing Unlimited by Michelle Kay a fair bit... plus there are a couple of people in our corps who have either put psalms to music, or re-tuned (hehe) old salvo songs.
chickette
9th April 2005, 09:11 AM
Jared and chickette,
I haven't heard of Soteria, we sing Unlimited by Michelle Kay a fair bit... plus there are a couple of people in our corps who have either put psalms to music, or re-tuned (hehe) old salvo songs.
Yeh, at least one of the new ones is an old song put to new music. Don't know if any of you have heard the song "Tell The World"?
But I haven't heard of Michelle Kay. Where is she from?
Evangelina
10th April 2005, 06:36 PM
Michelle's from Sydney or Melbourne... I'm guessing Sydney though.
Sascha Fitzpatrick
10th April 2005, 08:39 PM
Yeah Sydney... I think she's in the 'modern' songsters...
Sasch
Abiel
11th April 2005, 05:18 AM
you know, after the last few weeks I have had, I reckon there are some ways we arent old fashioned enough. Being a Christian is supposed to make a difference. That 'holiness' thing. I wonder if we are a holy people anymore.
Evangelina
12th April 2005, 02:30 AM
*hugggggggggggggggggggg* to Abiel.
Guys n gals, I put a link to ArmyBarmy's worship music demos - worth a look! Esp. if you want new stuff that's still 'army'... hehe.
Andy Broadley
14th April 2005, 01:36 PM
you know, after the last few weeks I have had, I reckon there are some ways we arent old fashioned enough. Being a Christian is supposed to make a difference. That 'holiness' thing. I wonder if we are a holy people anymore.
Probably unrelated but there was a time when the 'Sunday morning family service' was called the 'Holiness meeting'.
elm0
14th April 2005, 07:57 PM
It still is in some corps from what I hear.
I can't speak for any other SA corps, but our leadership team is constantly reviewing/refining things, be it church services or community services. I have been happy to see the leaders making changes where they think changes are needed. Not everyone has been happy with the changes, but that's the thing with change, it usually upsets someone. I think that's why a lot of churches, not just SA, choose to keep doing things the way they always have.
tadpole29
17th April 2005, 08:30 AM
Change is good within every church not just TSA. While it seems the number of officers retired is a lot, they are mostly still active, and also look at all the local officers. The officer is supposed to be the leader, but they can't do it alone, and without help from the leaders and CSM, YPSM, etc. they would be burnt out. So I don't think we need to worry about how many officers there are just yet. Besides next year there will be 2 more in training, my wife and I
chaplainjared
20th April 2005, 09:04 PM
It is just so frustrating!!!
A very wise preacher once said, "staying where you are is just as bad as moving backwards"....
I suppose every corp is different, but in mine all the "old" people are COMPLETLY AFRAID of change....and it is going to destroy our corp, and those in similar situations.
We have tried to softly implemement new things into our corp, and all we get is OLD people having a cry and complaining that they dont like it, becasue its not the way things have been done in the past!
Dare i say this is completly selfish...
Last week we had a "childrens ministries weekend" when the corp embrases the young people and we focus the whole service on them with childrens songs etc....BUT GUESS WHAT....The old people COMPLAINED, and some refused to even come along, or join in. CAN ANYONE SEE MY FRUSTRATIONS? Yesterday we even tried to involve an older lady in our "church news" program that we are trying to get going and guess what? she refused!, i guess my frustrations for creating this topic came from my own corp! I am at the end of my rope. I love the salvation army and what it stands for and what it does, but i will go so far as to say i completly dislike my corp because they simply wont move! What ever happened to compromise, supporting the young ones, embrasing the future? i admit its probably very hard for them to accept change but we have been trying for 2 years now and they still feel the same way!
I one of three youth leaders at my corp and i orgasnise the programs and events we do. We have had a HUGE struggle bringing our youth from youth group into the church, and to tell you the truth, if i was them i wouldnt want to come either. I invited one of my friends mothers to church on the weekend, but i didnt invite them to my corp because i wouldnt want them to go there cos i know they would fall asleep. I invited them to join me at another church. Something must be wrong when this happens!.....................................................................................I just want to leave the church and go somewhere else! any advice peoples?
Evangelina
20th April 2005, 09:45 PM
Jared... sometimes churches die. That I'll admit straight up. I do believe that sometimes, it's best for us to pack up and move on rather than stay in a church that's slowly stagnating.
The BEST advice I can offer is to go to God with this. Pray HARD. Ask him what he wants you to do. He may want you to stay and keep trying to make changes. He may want you to stay and just pray hard. He may want you to stay and start your own service or small group. He may want you to leave there. I don't know. And as you pray, explore the possible options. Often when we do this God will give us a push one way, or close a door another.
Hmmm... hope that helps.
elm0
21st April 2005, 02:23 AM
Your situation isn't unusual, many churches have been through that Jared.
Some churches have overcome this by starting a seperate service aimed at younger people, usually Sunday night, some even have them on a Saturday night if they already have a Sunday night service.
Our corp has basically the same service morning and night, same songs and message usually, so the people involved don't have to prepare 2 seperate programs every week. The morning is more 'family friendly', at night the music tends to be more upbeat/louder, more what the youth prefer.
Col
21st April 2005, 08:55 AM
I know that I am joining this thread a bit late and maybe I am a bit off topic here but, I think that what I like about the Savaltion Army is that it is predictable and very consistent.
I live in Canberra and every year I always attend the Easter Dawn Service beside Lake Burley Griffin, because I know what it will be like.
We sing the same wonderful stirring hymns, have a stiring short sermon and a lovely fellowship sausage sizzle bbq breakfast on completion. It is truly christianity at its finest and most basic with no frills; just the message and the people. You see the same familiar faces every year, it really is a special day for me and I can't imagine Easter without it.
I know that many churches put on elaborate easter services leading up to and during the period, but it doesn't hold a candle to a cold morning by the lake with a pure, refreshing, unadulterated, unashamedly christian message to a receptive flock accompanied by a small brass band and choir.
Thank God for the Salvos :thumbsup:
Abiel
21st April 2005, 11:25 AM
Thank you for the encouragement Col.
TheDag
21st April 2005, 07:47 PM
It is just so frustrating!!!
A very wise preacher once said, "staying where you are is just as bad as moving backwards"....
I suppose every corp is different, but in mine all the "old" people are COMPLETLY AFRAID of change....and it is going to destroy our corp, and those in similar situations.
We have tried to softly implemement new things into our corp, and all we get is OLD people having a cry and complaining that they dont like it, becasue its not the way things have been done in the past!
Dare i say this is completly selfish...
At an anglican church I used to go to the minister had the same kind of problem. A number of years later we were talking and he shared that he had the wrong approach at first. He said when he took the time to understand them and where ther're coming from he was able to change much more than he had ever hoped for! We need to be careful that we aren't trampling the older members or excluding them just because something needs to change. It is a delicate balancing act.
Warren Peace
21st April 2005, 08:08 PM
...what I like about the Savaltion Army is that it is predictable and very consistent....Apparently you haven't been to my old corps ;)
Thanks for the compliments and God bless you!
Andy Broadley
22nd April 2005, 01:46 AM
I've said it before & I'll say it again. Change is essential, or we'll die of apathy, but beware of not chucking out the baby with the bathwater.
Andy Broadley
22nd April 2005, 02:30 AM
Talking of change, here's an article I found, which should be music to the ears of those fighting for female leadership withing the church.
http://www.christianitytoday.com/history/newsletter/2004/feb6.html
Although the Army has always had women in positions of leadship, this article makes a subtle change. It decribes William Botth as the Army's co founder, with his wife Catherine.
Anybody got a problem with that?
chickette
22nd April 2005, 09:19 AM
Chaplain Jared, I can kinda relate again. Our church a couple of years ago made the change to the Sunday night meeting and made it focused on youth more. We lost many older people from our church because of it, they didn't like it, they didn't want change. (They went to a church that later made a similar move...hehe.) Now what our church has is two separate congregations, the older people that come in the morning and the younger group that come at night, and the problem is that neither groups want to make an effort to go to the other service cos they are so different. It's annoying, I guess not as much to me as I'm not a leader. (I'm 16!) But it's annoying to see this kind of separation in the church. :sigh:
Andy Broadley
22nd April 2005, 09:43 AM
So this wonderful 'change' has succeeded in splitting the corps in two....sounds productive
chickette
22nd April 2005, 10:57 PM
So this wonderful 'change' has succeeded in splitting the corps in two....sounds productive
There is good that has come out of it. Without this change, there would be NO youth at our church. I'd say there is definitely more good than bad that has come out of it and I would say that people's attitude towards the other generations have been changing. And we sometimes combine the two congregations for one special service, so I guess there isn't a complete separation. It's definitely better than it used to be.
Andy Broadley
23rd April 2005, 02:29 AM
I pray it works out for your corps. I'm not good, or qualified at giving advice, but I feel on safe ground here 'cause I nicked it from John Smith (Godsquad), an Aussie.
Paul said to Timothy, Let no man despise your youth, but you be an example through faith. This is good advice.
On the other hand, it would be foolish to discount the value of experience gained through age. The older people where once your age and went through similer experiences. So don't ever give up on each other, keep plugging away.
And remember that one day YOU will be the older generation and the kids will be calling YOU stuck in the past and inflexible.
What goes around comes around.
Delta One
23rd April 2005, 08:07 AM
Hello chaplainjared,
Lets face it, that salvation army used to be a massive, radical christian movement at the forefront of evangelism, and a movement who was 'with the times' and new how to reach the lost souls.
The Salvation Army was created by William Booth to reach the poor and homeless with both the message of the Gospel and in physical help because, at that time, homeless people were not overly welcomed in other churches. I think that the Salvation Army must get back to what it was founded to do. I read in the Warcry or somewhere else about William Booth's dream that inspired him to create a new church with the specific purpose of reaching the poor and helpless. It was quite amazing and I am indeed convinced that the dream was inspired by God Himself to meet a particular part of society, i.e. the outcasts. Jesus had a special heart for the helpless - it's like what my Captain said: "If you want to get on God's bad side, pick on widows, the homeless, the orphans, because God has a heart for them and will stand up fight for them" [paraphrased because I've forgotten the exact words].
and i once herd a captain say "going to the salvation army for sunday worship has become like going through a time warp every saturday night in our sleep, we wake up sunday morning and all of a sudden we have gone back 50 years in time".....
I don't think like that. Our Capatin always has very good and inspiring sermons and, although we don't sing the songs out of the old song book, we do praise God through the modern day Hillsong songs. The corps officer up at Port Macquarie is so enthuastic about God and his sermons show it! It's almost as if his energy radiates and affects those around him! I'd really like that officer to provide why it is like going back 50 years in time...
I'm sorry that I didn't get around to answering the rest as I've got to go now, but God Bless you and the Army,
Delta One.
Warren Peace
23rd April 2005, 08:55 AM
I've said it before & I'll say it again. Change is essential, or we'll die of apathy, but beware of not chucking out the baby with the bathwater.Yes, but change for the sake of change can be very damaging.
Andy Broadley
23rd April 2005, 08:56 AM
Yes, but change for the sake of change can be very damaging.
here here
Willo
23rd April 2005, 02:22 PM
I would have to say from the area where I live, the rep the Salvos have is that of one of trying to get every cent out of you.
I do alot of street preaching / witnessing, and never once have we met a salvo out there, which I believe is sad considering what General Booth used to do. It is my belief from an outsider looking in, that the salvation army needs to turn back to its orignal roots. It needs to get back to where it was out on the streets calling sinners to the foot of a blood stained cross.
The army got a rep, as a charity which is good and is Christianity in practice, but now we need a balance, the army needs to show Christianity being preached.
I would say that if William Booth saw the state of the army today, he would be sad, as it seems to have strayed from the orignal path. The path of seeking and saving the lost, the path of holiness.
This is just what I have seen from someone on the outside. The Salvos have a mighty and great tradtion in God. Lets see it return.
I would love to see the army produce preachers like Chaplain Mackenzie again, who was a fearless warrior for the Kingdom of God with the Australian army.
God Bless the Salvos
Andy Broadley
23rd April 2005, 05:23 PM
I would have to say from the area where I live, the rep the Salvos have is that of one of trying to get every cent out of you.
Say's it all, doesn't it ?:sigh:
Willo
23rd April 2005, 05:34 PM
Say's it all, doesn't it ?:sigh:
Sadly :(
In the area I live there are heaps of people that need the salvation army charity, but all they got was a shop that is selling items at a more expensive rate than other shops doing the same thing.
The problem I see is that it doesn't just reflect on the army, but on Christians in general.
chaplainjared
4th May 2005, 09:28 PM
All i can say is "change for the sake of change"????? WHAT THE????
Obviously this is not the case!! If anyone out there is realistic, we will realise we have to change to keep with the times and to keep church relevant to THOSE WHO DONT KNOW JESUS!!! ANYONE DISPUTE THIS????
So HOW can we make church RELEVANT to those out there in the community, and the younger generations so that they ACTUALLY WANT to come to church??
You tell me? I get so frustrated when people refuse to change because they are simply TOO HAPPY DOING THINGS THE SAME WAY THEY HAVE ALWAYS BEEN DONE.
Keeping things OLD FASSIONED is just the way some people like it, but dare i say these people are too scared to step out of there comfort zone, and are too selfish to change. EVEN IF IT MEANS OTHERS WILL COME TO A KNOWLEDGE OF JESUS CHRIST......WHO CARES! I want to do things my way, the way they have always been done!!!
And ui would say a divided church with 50 people going to an older service and 50 people going to a modern service is BETTER than 70 people going to one service, because obviously it means 30 more people are experience worship and teaching of the one true GOD.
I get so frustrated here, like you wouldnt believe. surely we are about saving souls, so then what is the BEST way to do this? simple.
and if you dont now the answer, try looking at the more larger churches. what are they doing? Obviously lots of people have issues with hillsong and similar churches, but they have to be doing something right, otherwise God would not bless them like he does, and God would put a stop to it.
Warren Peace
4th May 2005, 10:42 PM
All i can say is "change for the sake of change"????? WHAT THE????If you are refering to my ancient remark, that wasn't intended to apply to your situation... it was a statement about change in general. If changes are made simply because there hasn't been a change in a while, then that is bad... thus the term "change for the sake of change".
I hope that clears up your confusion... assuming of course your comment was directed at me. If it was not, then please ignore my reply.
Then again, everyone else ignores my replies anyway ;)
Blessings...
Copyright ©2000-2008, ChristianForums.com