Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Kid's Corporal Punishment - a Risk to Mental Health
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stevevw" data-source="post: 77664286" data-attributes="member: 342064"><p>Yet you linked an article on equalizing women in society as an example of prevention of abuse. </p><p></p><p>Ok but there is still a degree of control and power difference in the roles. They are rigid in that one stays at home while the other is out in the world developing their work opportunities and independence.</p><p></p><p>Therefore we can have people believing two identicle situations and yet one is abusive and the other not. So belief is gendered division of labour itself is not abusive. The only thing we can use to measure the difference is the injection of abusive and violent control of the very same situation. </p><p></p><p>You missed the point. All those sub headfings under violent power and control have an opposite in positive supportive behaviour for the same situations. So we have two situations that are the same where one can be about violence, abuse and all the subheadings as forms of violence and control and the other the opposites where there is no violence and control. So the situation itself be it a hierarchy or rigid roes is not inherently abusive as a belief. </p><p></p><p>Then this is support for my claim that abusers are deluded and unreal. They truely believe that abuse is good for people. If they truely do not intend to abuse and believe that the harm and destruction they are inflicting is actually good for the person then they are unreal and are not seeing reality, the reality of the situation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stevevw, post: 77664286, member: 342064"] Yet you linked an article on equalizing women in society as an example of prevention of abuse. Ok but there is still a degree of control and power difference in the roles. They are rigid in that one stays at home while the other is out in the world developing their work opportunities and independence. Therefore we can have people believing two identicle situations and yet one is abusive and the other not. So belief is gendered division of labour itself is not abusive. The only thing we can use to measure the difference is the injection of abusive and violent control of the very same situation. You missed the point. All those sub headfings under violent power and control have an opposite in positive supportive behaviour for the same situations. So we have two situations that are the same where one can be about violence, abuse and all the subheadings as forms of violence and control and the other the opposites where there is no violence and control. So the situation itself be it a hierarchy or rigid roes is not inherently abusive as a belief. Then this is support for my claim that abusers are deluded and unreal. They truely believe that abuse is good for people. If they truely do not intend to abuse and believe that the harm and destruction they are inflicting is actually good for the person then they are unreal and are not seeing reality, the reality of the situation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Kid's Corporal Punishment - a Risk to Mental Health
Top
Bottom