Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
SCOTUS' conservative majority makes a surprise decision
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="essentialsaltes" data-source="post: 77476751" data-attributes="member: 294566"><p>Whoops!</p><p></p><h3><a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/4338182-appeals-court-reverses-ruling-desantis-congressional-maps/?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark" target="_blank">Florida appeals court reverses ruling on DeSantis’s congressional maps</a></h3><p>The appeals court said the lower court misapplied precedent, and that the suit challenging the maps should have been dismissed.</p><p></p><p>A 2015 Florida Supreme Court case ruled that state Republicans violated the amendments in their 2010 congressional maps, focusing on districts surrounding Jacksonville, leading the court to force a new set of district boundaries.</p><p></p><p>The lower court <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/4184784-judge-rejects-desantis-drawn-congressional-map/" target="_blank">threw out these maps</a> in September — citing the 2015 Florida Supreme Court case. But the appeals court decided Friday that the case was not binding precedent and should not have been relied upon, instead leaning on other factors.</p><p></p><p>The ruling means that all of North Florida’s congressional districts — all of which are [now] held by Republicans — will remain in effect for the 2024 elections unless the case is again overturned by the Florida Supreme Court.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="essentialsaltes, post: 77476751, member: 294566"] Whoops! [HEADING=2][URL='https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/4338182-appeals-court-reverses-ruling-desantis-congressional-maps/?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark']Florida appeals court reverses ruling on DeSantis’s congressional maps[/URL][/HEADING] The appeals court said the lower court misapplied precedent, and that the suit challenging the maps should have been dismissed. A 2015 Florida Supreme Court case ruled that state Republicans violated the amendments in their 2010 congressional maps, focusing on districts surrounding Jacksonville, leading the court to force a new set of district boundaries. The lower court [URL='https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/4184784-judge-rejects-desantis-drawn-congressional-map/']threw out these maps[/URL] in September — citing the 2015 Florida Supreme Court case. But the appeals court decided Friday that the case was not binding precedent and should not have been relied upon, instead leaning on other factors. The ruling means that all of North Florida’s congressional districts — all of which are [now] held by Republicans — will remain in effect for the 2024 elections unless the case is again overturned by the Florida Supreme Court. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
SCOTUS' conservative majority makes a surprise decision
Top
Bottom