Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Proving that Links Exist
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ophiolite" data-source="post: 77584783" data-attributes="member: 234799"><p>That is just confirmation that you do not understand the function of a classification system. Classification systems provide a more convenient way of discussing "things". They help us to grasp the character, relationships and history of "things". </p><p></p><p>As our understanding of character, relationshops and history of certain "things" grows it is appropriate to modify the classification. To do otherwise would diminish the value of the classification system and would thus be a foolish inaction. </p><p></p><p>Raising petulant objections to such changes because you are uncomfortable with change, or because you mistakenly think it is a weakness in science that you can attack, is an exercise that offers no benefits outside of such comfort as it may bring to you personally. </p><p></p><p>As I said, the classification system is unaffected by your irrelevant objections.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ophiolite, post: 77584783, member: 234799"] That is just confirmation that you do not understand the function of a classification system. Classification systems provide a more convenient way of discussing "things". They help us to grasp the character, relationships and history of "things". As our understanding of character, relationshops and history of certain "things" grows it is appropriate to modify the classification. To do otherwise would diminish the value of the classification system and would thus be a foolish inaction. Raising petulant objections to such changes because you are uncomfortable with change, or because you mistakenly think it is a weakness in science that you can attack, is an exercise that offers no benefits outside of such comfort as it may bring to you personally. As I said, the classification system is unaffected by your irrelevant objections. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Proving that Links Exist
Top
Bottom