Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Police officer hiring in US increases in 2023 after years of decline, survey shows
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rjs330" data-source="post: 77660807" data-attributes="member: 377008"><p>Well that's certainly true to a point. Money us needed for certain things. More money does not akeays equate to better things where government is concerned. Education is evidence of that. We spend more money on education in the US than the EU does oer child. Yet they constantly grade higher than we do. Chile spends a lot but has one of the lowest education systems. You could go state by state and see that more money does not a I ways equate to better education. There are things we could right now that wouldn't cost us more money. In fact it would save us money. And the savings could go into the teachers pockets. Also evening out the the expenditures would help certain areas. </p><p></p><p>If Boston had a single collection point for it's school funding and passed that Money out evenly across all districts you could obtain a clear picture of which districts perform the worst. Then use problem-solving to fix the issues in the worst districts. If the other districts are doing well why isn't this one. </p><p></p><p>With cops more money is required for more training. Simply due to the job they do. You could have longer academies. Say one year before hitting the street. The continue into a Field Training Program that lasts a full year. </p><p>.that's two full years if training before a cop is left alone. </p><p>.</p><p>Then there is on going specialized training for police in ethics, use of force de_escalation, dealing with people in crisis. The changes in the law, active shooters and the list goes on, such as physical defense. All of that takes a lot of money to pay for instructors taking people off the street to train. This will require more Cops as well. In the case of police it's already been shown that you get what you pay for. Low pay gets you a lesser quality of candidate.</p><p></p><p>I seriously would like the academy be at least a full year of training. With communications including de-escalation traing getting as many hours as physical skills and firearms skills. Many more hours on law. Officers when ygey I eave tge academy ought to kniw tge law backward and forward including arrest and search and seizure. All if that will build profesionalism into the profession. But getting communities to pay for it is another matter entirely. </p><p>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rjs330, post: 77660807, member: 377008"] Well that's certainly true to a point. Money us needed for certain things. More money does not akeays equate to better things where government is concerned. Education is evidence of that. We spend more money on education in the US than the EU does oer child. Yet they constantly grade higher than we do. Chile spends a lot but has one of the lowest education systems. You could go state by state and see that more money does not a I ways equate to better education. There are things we could right now that wouldn't cost us more money. In fact it would save us money. And the savings could go into the teachers pockets. Also evening out the the expenditures would help certain areas. If Boston had a single collection point for it's school funding and passed that Money out evenly across all districts you could obtain a clear picture of which districts perform the worst. Then use problem-solving to fix the issues in the worst districts. If the other districts are doing well why isn't this one. With cops more money is required for more training. Simply due to the job they do. You could have longer academies. Say one year before hitting the street. The continue into a Field Training Program that lasts a full year. .that's two full years if training before a cop is left alone. . Then there is on going specialized training for police in ethics, use of force de_escalation, dealing with people in crisis. The changes in the law, active shooters and the list goes on, such as physical defense. All of that takes a lot of money to pay for instructors taking people off the street to train. This will require more Cops as well. In the case of police it's already been shown that you get what you pay for. Low pay gets you a lesser quality of candidate. I seriously would like the academy be at least a full year of training. With communications including de-escalation traing getting as many hours as physical skills and firearms skills. Many more hours on law. Officers when ygey I eave tge academy ought to kniw tge law backward and forward including arrest and search and seizure. All if that will build profesionalism into the profession. But getting communities to pay for it is another matter entirely. . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Police officer hiring in US increases in 2023 after years of decline, survey shows
Top
Bottom